RaceGT Wireless Mouse USB C & USB A vs HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse
Updated August 2026 — The RaceGT Wireless Mouse offers advanced features and comfort, making it a better choice for versatile users, while the HP Z3700 is a solid budget option.
The RaceGT Wireless Mouse offers advanced features and comfort, making it a better choice for versatile users, while the HP Z3700 is a solid budget option.
Why RaceGT Wireless Mouse USB C & USB A is better
Connectivity
RaceGT has dual-mode USB-A and Type-C connectivity.
Silent Operation
RaceGT features silent buttons for quiet use.
Charging
RaceGT supports Type-C fast charging.
Why HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is better
Price
HP Z3700 is cheaper at £14.61.
Battery Life
HP Z3700 lasts up to 16 months on a single AA battery.
Portability
HP Z3700 has a USB receiver that fits inside the mouse.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | RaceGT Wireless Mouse USB C & USB A | HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | RaceGT | HP |
| Price | £16.99 | £14.61 |
| Connection | USB-C & USB-A | 2.4GHz |
| Silent Clicks | Yes | No |
| Multi-OS Support | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
The RaceGT Wireless Mouse USB C & USB A offers a sleek and sophisticated design with a classic black finish, while the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse stands out with its unique slim style. The RaceGT mouse features a surface covered with a soft rubber coating, ensuring a smooth and skin-friendly feel. Its ergonomic curved design minimises fatigue, making it ideal for extended use. In contrast, the HP Z3700 is designed to complement HP devices and is highly portable, with its USB receiver fitting neatly inside the mouse for easy transport. Both mice are designed with a focus on aesthetics and functionality, appealing to different user preferences.
Connectivity Options
When it comes to connectivity, the RaceGT Wireless Mouse leads with its dual-mode receiver that accommodates both USB-A and Type-C ports, allowing compatibility with a broader range of devices, including the latest MacBook models and Android phones. This feature eliminates the need for adapters, providing seamless cross-platform functionality. The HP Z3700, on the other hand, utilises a reliable 2.4GHz wireless connection through a USB receiver, which is standard but less versatile than RaceGT's dual connectivity. Users needing more flexibility might find the RaceGT mouse more appealing due to its dual-interface capability.
Battery Life and Charging
The RaceGT Wireless Mouse is designed for convenience with Type-C fast charging, allowing users to charge the mouse using standard smartphone cables or USB ports. A full charge provides weeks of battery life, making it ideal for those who prefer not to deal with frequent battery changes. In comparison, the HP Z3700 boasts an impressive battery life of up to 16 months on a single AA battery, which is a significant selling point for users seeking long-term usability without the hassle of charging. While both options provide excellent battery solutions, the RaceGT offers a modern charging experience, whereas the HP Z3700 focuses on longevity.
User Experience and Comfort
User comfort is a key consideration in both models. The RaceGT Wireless Mouse features an ergonomic design that reduces fatigue during long usage periods, making it suitable for professionals and students alike. Its quiet operation, with noise reduction of over 90% on click sounds, enhances concentration in quiet environments such as libraries or offices. Conversely, the HP Z3700, while functional and portable, does not emphasise silent functionality. It provides a comfortable grip but lacks specific ergonomic features that may be beneficial for users who spend extended hours working. As such, the RaceGT may be the better choice for those prioritising comfort and quiet operation.
Portability and Usability
In terms of portability, both mice are designed with on-the-go users in mind. The RaceGT Wireless Mouse's ultra-slim and compact design fits easily into bags, making it a great travel companion. Its plug-and-play functionality allows for immediate use without the need for drivers, which is an advantage for users who switch between devices frequently. The HP Z3700 also excels in portability, with a compact design and USB receiver that conveniently stores inside the mouse. Both mice offer ease of use, but the RaceGT’s dual connectivity and quick charging may appeal more to users with diverse device ecosystems.
Compatibility and Multi-OS Support
Compatibility is an important factor for many users, and both the RaceGT and HP Z3700 cater to a range of operating systems. The RaceGT Wireless Mouse supports a wide variety of devices, including laptops, desktops, and mobile devices equipped with USB-C ports, making it highly versatile. Meanwhile, the HP Z3700 supports various operating systems, including Windows (7, 8, 10, 11), Mac OS (10.3 or later), and Chrome OS. This broad compatibility ensures that both mice can be used across different platforms, though the RaceGT’s dual connectivity might offer an edge for users needing to connect to both modern and traditional devices.
Price Comparison
The RaceGT Wireless Mouse is priced at £16.99, while the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse is slightly more affordable at £14.61. Although the price difference is minimal, the additional features of the RaceGT, such as dual connectivity and silent operation, may justify the higher cost for users looking for enhanced functionality. On the other hand, those seeking a basic, stylish mouse for everyday tasks may find the HP Z3700 to be a more economical choice. Ultimately, the decision may come down to whether the user values additional features enough to invest the extra £2.38.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the RaceGT Wireless Mouse USB C & USB A and the HP Z3700 Wireless Mouse largely depends on user needs and preferences. The RaceGT offers advanced features like dual-mode connectivity, silent operation, and Type-C fast charging, making it an excellent option for users who require versatility and comfort, especially in professional settings. Conversely, the HP Z3700 is a more budget-friendly choice with impressive battery life and solid compatibility across multiple operating systems, ideal for users who need a reliable mouse for everyday use. Ultimately, if you prioritise premium features and comfort, the RaceGT may be worth the investment, whereas the HP Z3700 offers great value for those seeking simplicity and efficiency.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

