Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner with Anti Hair Wrap vs Dyson Cyclone V11 Absolute Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner
Updated August 2026 — The Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner offers excellent value with its specialized features for pet hair, while the Dyson Cyclone V11 excels in versatility and advanced technology. Ultimately, the Shark is the better choice for pet owners.
The Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner offers excellent value with its specialized features for pet hair, while the Dyson Cyclone V11 excels in versatility and advanced technology. Ultimately, the Shark is the better choice for pet owners.
Why Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner with Anti Hair Wrap is better
price
Shark is £444.72 compared to Dyson's £599.00
accessories
Shark includes a wider range of tools for various cleaning tasks
hair cleaning
Shark's Anti Hair Wrap Technology specifically targets pet hair
Why Dyson Cyclone V11 Absolute Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner is better
weight
Dyson is designed for lightweight portability
adaptability
Dyson's torque-drive nozzle adapts to different floor types
battery life
Both have similar battery life, but Dyson's is more integrated
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner with Anti Hair Wrap | Dyson Cyclone V11 Absolute Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Shark | Dyson |
| Design Type | Upright | Handheld |
| Anti-Allergen | Yes | Yes |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Power Levels | 1 | 3 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner with Anti Hair Wrap is priced at £444.72, while the Dyson Cyclone V11 Absolute Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner is more expensive at £599.00. Both vacuums offer impressive features tailored to different cleaning needs, but their design and functionalities differ significantly.
The Shark vacuum is designed specifically for tackling hair with its Anti Hair Wrap Technology, making it ideal for homes with pets. In contrast, the Dyson model is a versatile handheld vacuum that adapts to various floor types, showcasing its advanced technology and user-friendly features. Understanding these differences can help consumers choose the right vacuum for their specific requirements.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Shark vacuum weighs 5.6 kg and boasts a robust build, while Dyson’s design focuses on lightweight portability, making it easy to handle. The Shark’s upright design with a powered lift-away feature allows users to clean under furniture effortlessly, maintaining its cleaning power while in portable mode.
Dyson’s Cyclone V11, although a handheld model, includes a wall bracket for easy storage and features a torque-drive floor nozzle that automatically adjusts to different surfaces. Each vacuum’s design caters to its intended use, with the Shark focusing on upright cleaning efficiency and Dyson prioritising versatility and ease of use.
Performance on Different Surfaces
Performance is a critical aspect when comparing these vacuums. The Shark vacuum features DuoClean and PowerFins technology, which effectively lifts stuck-on dust from hard floors and captures hair and debris. This makes it particularly effective across various surfaces, including carpets and hard flooring.
On the other hand, the Dyson Cyclone V11 is equipped with a torque-drive floor nozzle that automatically adapts to different floor types. This feature enhances its performance, ensuring optimal cleaning on both carpets and hard floors. With both models offering around 60 minutes of operating time, they are competitively matched in terms of battery life but excel in their unique cleaning technologies.
Ease of Use and Portability
The Shark vacuum, with its powered lift-away feature, easily transforms into a portable vacuum, enhancing its usability for cleaning under furniture or in tight spaces. The inclusion of multiple tools, such as a pet tool and a dusting brush, allows for thorough cleaning in various settings.
Dyson’s Cyclone V11 is designed for quick, accessible cleaning with its cordless functionality and lightweight design. The presence of three power levels allows users to adjust the suction according to the cleaning task at hand. While both vacuums are user-friendly, the Shark may offer more versatility in terms of cleaning options due to its additional attachments.
Filtration and Allergens
When it comes to filtration systems, the Shark vacuum claims to capture and trap 99.9% of dust and allergens inside the vacuum, which is particularly beneficial for allergy sufferers. This effectiveness is based on IEC standard 62885-2 Cl. 5.11, ensuring that the air remains clean while using the vacuum.
Conversely, the Dyson Cyclone V11 is also suitable for allergy sufferers, featuring advanced filtration that captures microscopic dust particles. However, the Shark's complete seal technology offers a slight edge in ensuring that allergens do not escape back into the environment during cleaning.
Battery Life and Charging
Both vacuums offer approximately 60 minutes of operating time, making them reliable for extended cleaning sessions. The Shark model features a removable battery pack that can be charged at any plug socket, providing flexibility in charging options. This means users can easily swap batteries if they have a second one, allowing for uninterrupted cleaning.
The Dyson Cyclone V11 also provides a similar battery life but lacks the removable battery feature. As a result, users must charge the entire unit, which may limit cleaning time if the battery runs low. While both models excel in battery life, the Shark offers added convenience with its removable battery.
Accessories and Tools
The Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum comes equipped with a variety of accessories, including a pet tool, wide upholstery tool, crevice tool, dusting brush, and an accessory bag, enhancing its versatility for different cleaning tasks. This comprehensive set ensures users are well-equipped to tackle various surfaces and debris types.
In comparison, the Dyson Cyclone V11 includes a mini electric brush, extra hard brush, and combination nozzle, catering to specific cleaning needs. While both vacuums provide valuable tools, the Shark’s broader range of accessories may offer more options for users with diverse cleaning requirements.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Shark Cordless Upright Vacuum Cleaner with Anti Hair Wrap and the Dyson Cyclone V11 Absolute Cordless Handheld Vacuum Cleaner ultimately depends on your cleaning needs and preferences. If you have pets or require a vacuum specifically for hair and debris, the Shark model's Anti Hair Wrap Technology and extensive accessory kit make it an excellent choice at a lower price of £444.72.
However, if you prioritise versatility and lightweight handling, the Dyson Cyclone V11, priced at £599.00, offers advanced technology and adaptability for various floor types. Each vacuum has distinct advantages, so consider what features are most important for your home before making a decision.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

