vsversusfinder

Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning Ba vs Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days

Updated August 2026The Shark PowerDetect offers advanced features and superior allergen control, while the Roomba 105 is a budget-friendly option with impressive self-emptying capabilities.

The Shark PowerDetect offers advanced features and superior allergen control, while the Roomba 105 is a budget-friendly option with impressive self-emptying capabilities.

Why Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning Ba is better

advanced features

Shark has superior navigation and automatic water refilling

allergen control

Shark captures 99.9% of allergens with anti-odour technology

cleaning technology

Shark uses 5x PowerDetect Cleaning Technologies

Why Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days is better

price

Roomba is significantly cheaper at £179.00

self-emptying duration

Roomba self-empties for up to 75 days

cleaning modes

Roomba offers multiple cleaning modes including vac only and mop only

Overall score

Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning Ba
85
Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days
75

Specifications

SpecShark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning BaRoomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days
BrandSharkiRobot
Cleaning ModesN/AMultiple
Dustbin Capacity60 days75 days
Allergen Capture99.9%99%
Navigation3D LiDARClearView LiDAR

Dimension comparison

Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning BaRoomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days

Price Comparison

When considering the price, the Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop is significantly more affordable at £179.00 compared to the Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop, which retails at £399.00. This substantial difference of £220 reflects not only the unique features of each product but also their target market. The Roomba offers a budget-friendly option for those looking for a capable robotic vacuum and mop without breaking the bank, while the Shark presents a more premium solution with advanced features.

Cleaning Technology

The Shark PowerDetect is equipped with 5x PowerDetect Cleaning Technologies, which automatically detect dirt, edges, and corners to target hidden debris and stains. This feature enhances its ability to clean various floor types effectively, whether dry or wet. In contrast, the Roomba 105 employs a 4-Stage Cleaning system, boasting 70 times more suction than its predecessor, the Roomba 600 series. This means that while the Shark focuses on detecting and reacting to dirt, the Roomba delivers robust suction to eliminate messes. Each robot has its cleaning strengths, tailored to different cleaning needs.

Self-Emptying Features

The self-emptying capabilities of both products are impressive but vary in duration. The Shark PowerDetect can empty its dustbin for up to 60 days, while the Roomba 105 excels with a self-emptying dock that holds debris for up to 75 days. This 15-day difference could be a deciding factor for users who prefer less frequent maintenance. Both devices help minimise the mess of emptying dustbins, but the Roomba's longer duration may appeal more to those seeking convenience.

Navigational capabilities are a strong point for both robots, but they utilise different technologies. The Shark PowerDetect features 3D 360° LiDAR vision mapping, allowing it to bypass obstacles and customise cleaning via an app. Users can even schedule cleans and set no-go zones using voice commands with Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant. On the other hand, the Roomba 105 employs ClearView LiDAR for quick mapping and efficient cleaning in neat rows. While both systems are effective, the Shark offers more customisation options through its app, potentially giving it an edge for tech-savvy users.

Cleaning Modes

In terms of versatility, the Roomba 105 provides several cleaning modes, including vac only, mop only, or a combination of both. This flexibility allows users to tailor the cleaning experience to their specific needs, ensuring that carpets are not mopped accidentally thanks to automatic carpet detection. Conversely, the Shark PowerDetect offers a comprehensive cleaning experience across all floor types but does not specify multiple modes. Users who value customised cleaning options may find the Roomba 105 more appealing due to its adaptability.

Maintenance and Ease of Use

Both robotic vacuums are designed with user convenience in mind, but they differ in their maintenance features. The Shark PowerDetect not only self-empties but also refills its water tank for up to 30 days, washing and drying its mopping pad after each clean. This level of automation reduces the need for frequent user intervention. In comparison, the Roomba 105 simplifies maintenance with its AutoEmpty dock using AllergenLock bags that trap 99% of pollen and mould. While both robots aim to minimise ongoing maintenance, the Shark's water management system provides a more hands-off experience for mopping tasks.

Pet-Friendly Features

For pet owners, both products offer features designed to combat allergens and pet hair. The Shark PowerDetect includes an anti-allergen complete seal that captures 99.9% of dust, allergens, and irritants. It also incorporates anti-odour technology to maintain a fresh environment. The Roomba 105, meanwhile, focuses on trapping allergens with its AllergenLock bags, ensuring that dirt and dust do not escape during emptying. Both robots are effective for pet households, but the Shark's comprehensive sealing and odour control may provide an additional layer of comfort for those particularly concerned with allergens.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop and the Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop largely depends on your specific cleaning needs and budget. If you require advanced features, such as enhanced navigation, automatic water refilling, and superior allergen control, the Shark, at £399.00, might be worth the investment. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers excellent cleaning capabilities and convenience with self-emptying for up to 75 days, the Roomba 105 at £179.00 presents a compelling choice. Ultimately, both products excel in their own right, catering to different preferences and requirements in robotic vacuum technology.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum and Mop with 60-Day Self-emptying and Cleaning Ba vs Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoEmpty Dock - Self-Empties for 75 Days | versusfinder