vsversusfinder

Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut vs ARCTIC Freezer 36

Updated August 2026The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut excels in thermal conductivity and versatility, while the ARCTIC Freezer 36 offers robust cooling for high-end CPUs. Choose based on your specific cooling needs.

The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut excels in thermal conductivity and versatility, while the ARCTIC Freezer 36 offers robust cooling for high-end CPUs. Choose based on your specific cooling needs.

Why Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is better

Price

Kryonaut is significantly cheaper at £6.95.

Versatility

Can be used on CPUs and GPUs.

Application Ease

Includes a spatula for easy spreading.

Why ARCTIC Freezer 36 is better

Cooling Performance

Designed for high-end CPU cooling.

Installation Ease

Innovative Click-installation system.

Heat Transfer

Utilizes four offset heat pipes for efficient cooling.

Overall score

Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
85
ARCTIC Freezer 36
92

Specifications

SpecThermal Grizzly KryonautARCTIC Freezer 36
BrandThermal GrizzlyARCTIC
TypeThermal PasteCPU Cooler
Thermal Conductivity12.5 W/mKN/A
Fan SizeN/A120 mm
Mounting SystemSpatulaClick-installation
Price£6.95£22.99

Dimension comparison

Thermal Grizzly KryonautARCTIC Freezer 36

Overview of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and ARCTIC Freezer 36

The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and ARCTIC Freezer 36 serve distinct purposes in the realm of thermal management, with the former being a high-performance thermal paste and the latter a CPU cooler. The Kryonaut is priced at £6.95, focusing on enhancing thermal conductivity for CPUs and GPUs. In contrast, the Freezer 36, retailing at £22.99, is designed as a cooling solution that combines a heat sink and fans to manage CPU temperatures. Understanding their unique functionalities will help determine which product best suits your cooling needs.

Performance Comparison

When it comes to performance, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut boasts an impressive thermal conductivity rating of 12.5 W/mK, making it an excellent choice for demanding setups. This level of performance ensures that heat is effectively drawn away from critical components, thereby optimising their operation. On the other hand, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 employs four offset heat pipes and a pressure-optimised 120mm fan to facilitate rapid heat transfer from the CPU to the heat sink. This design allows for efficient cooling, especially under heavy loads, making it suitable for high-end CPUs.

Compatibility

In terms of compatibility, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is versatile, as it can be applied to a wide range of components, including CPUs and GPUs. This broad applicability makes it a go-to choice for various cooling needs. Conversely, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 requires specific mounting screws for AMD installations and is designed for Intel LGA1851 and LGA1700 sockets. This focused compatibility means that while it may not fit every setup, when it does, it offers significant cooling advantages.

Application Ease

The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is designed for easy application, featuring a specially designed spatula that simplifies the spreading process. This feature helps ensure that the paste is evenly distributed, maximising thermal coverage. In contrast, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 utilises an innovative Click-installation system for mounting, simplifying the cooler's installation and fan replacement process. While both products prioritise user-friendliness, the Kryonaut focuses on the application of thermal paste, whereas the Freezer 36 enhances the cooler setup experience.

Safety Features

Safety is a critical aspect of thermal management products. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is non-electrically conductive and non-capacitive, which mitigates the risk of short circuits during application. This characteristic is particularly reassuring for users who may be concerned about damaging their hardware. The ARCTIC Freezer 36, while not explicitly detailing safety features, is designed with improved contact pressure distribution to optimise heat transfer, indirectly contributing to the safe operation of high-end CPUs during intense workloads.

Cooling Efficiency

Cooling efficiency is paramount, and both products excel in their respective domains. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, with its high thermal conductivity, ensures that heat is efficiently conducted away from components, maintaining optimal operating temperatures. Meanwhile, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 enhances cooling efficiency through its side-flow heat sink design, which optimises airflow by drawing additional cool air into the case. This design not only improves thermal performance but also promotes better overall system ventilation.

Pricing Analysis

The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is priced at £6.95, making it an economical choice for those seeking to improve their cooling without significant investment. In comparison, the ARCTIC Freezer 36 is available for £22.99, which reflects its more complex design and additional functionalities as a complete cooling solution. While the Kryonaut offers outstanding value for a thermal paste, the Freezer 36’s higher price point may be justified by its comprehensive cooling capabilities, especially for users with high-performance CPUs.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and the ARCTIC Freezer 36 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a high-performance thermal paste that excels in thermal conductivity and versatility, the Kryonaut at £6.95 is an excellent choice. However, if you are looking for a robust CPU cooling solution that can handle high-end processors, the ARCTIC Freezer 36, priced at £22.99, is likely the better investment. Each product has its strengths, so consider your system's requirements when making a decision.

versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut vs ARCTIC Freezer 36 | versusfinder