Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut vs Noctua NT-H2 3.5g AM5 Edition
Updated August 2026 — The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut offers superior thermal conductivity and versatility, while the Noctua NT-H2 excels in ease of use and long-term stability. Choose based on your specific needs.
The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut offers superior thermal conductivity and versatility, while the Noctua NT-H2 excels in ease of use and long-term stability. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is better
thermal conductivity
Kryonaut has a thermal conductivity of 12.5W/mK
versatility
Kryonaut is suitable for CPUs, GPUs, and more
price
Kryonaut is more budget-friendly at £6.95
Why Noctua NT-H2 3.5g AM5 Edition is better
ease of use
NT-H2 requires no spreading before installation
long-term stability
NT-H2 has a recommended usage time of up to 5 years
cleaning convenience
NT-H2 includes cleaning wipes for easy cleanup
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut | Noctua NT-H2 3.5g AM5 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 12.5W/mK | Not specified |
| Pack Size | 1g | 3.5g |
| Application Method | Spatula | No spreading needed |
| Storage Time | Not specified | Up to 3 years |
| Usage Time | Not specified | Up to 5 years |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Thermal Pastes
In the realm of thermal pastes, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and Noctua NT-H2 3.5g AM5 Edition stand out due to their distinct features and performance capabilities. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is priced at £6.95, while the Noctua NT-H2 is available for £12.11. Both products aim to enhance thermal conductivity, but they cater to different user needs and applications.
The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut boasts an impressive thermal conductivity rating of 12.5W/mK, making it ideal for high-performance setups, while the Noctua NT-H2 focuses on optimal heat transfer and ease of use, particularly for AM5 based CPUs. This comparison will explore their features, usability, and overall value to help you decide which thermal paste is best suited for your needs.
Performance Comparison
Performance is a crucial factor when choosing a thermal paste, and the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut excels with its thermal conductivity of 12.5W/mK. This high rating is particularly beneficial for users who push their CPUs and GPUs to the limits, ensuring efficient heat dissipation in demanding scenarios.
In contrast, the Noctua NT-H2 offers a reliable performance, though it does not specify its thermal conductivity. However, it is designed for optimal heat transfer from CPUs or GPUs to heatsinks, ensuring effective cooling. It is worth noting that the NT-H2 is a second-generation product, building on the success of its award-winning predecessor, the NT-H1. While both products promise excellent performance, the Kryonaut's superior thermal conductivity gives it a distinct edge for enthusiasts and gamers alike.
Application and Ease of Use
When it comes to application, both thermal pastes provide user-friendly features, but they differ in approach. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut includes a specially designed spatula for even application, which allows users to achieve optimal coverage across the CPU or GPU surface. This feature is particularly useful for those who prefer a hands-on approach to applying thermal paste.
On the other hand, the Noctua NT-H2 simplifies the process further by eliminating the need to spread the paste before heatsink installation. This makes it incredibly easy to use, especially for beginners or those who want a quick and clean application. Additionally, the NT-H2 comes with NA-CW1 cleaning wipes, making it easy to clean up any excess paste. For users prioritising convenience, the NT-H2 may be the better option.
Compatibility and Versatility
Both thermal pastes offer wide compatibility, but their specific applications differ slightly. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is suitable for a range of applications, including CPUs, GPUs, and other components, making it a versatile choice for various cooling requirements. This flexibility is ideal for DIY builders who may use the paste across multiple systems.
Conversely, the Noctua NT-H2 is specifically designed as an AM5 edition, featuring a NA-TPG1 thermal paste guard that prevents thermal paste build-up in the cut-outs of the heatspreader. This targeted design makes it particularly advantageous for users with AMD Ryzen CPUs. While the Kryonaut excels in versatility, the NT-H2 is tailored for specific users, catering to those with AM5 systems.
Long-term Stability and Durability
Long-term stability is an essential consideration for thermal pastes, especially for users who prefer to maintain their systems over extended periods. The Noctua NT-H2 is noted for its excellent long-term stability, with a recommended storage time of up to three years and a usage time on the CPU of up to five years. This ensures that the paste retains its effectiveness over time, providing peace of mind for users who may not replace their thermal paste frequently.
In contrast, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut does not specify its longevity, making it difficult to gauge how it compares in this area. While both pastes are designed to perform well, the NT-H2’s clear recommendations for usage duration give it an advantage for those prioritising long-term reliability.
Price Point Analysis
Pricing is a significant factor in any product comparison, and there is a noticeable difference between the two thermal pastes. The Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut is priced at £6.95, making it a more budget-friendly option for users looking for high performance without breaking the bank. This makes it particularly appealing for gamers and enthusiasts who require top-tier thermal conductivity but may have budget constraints.
On the other hand, the Noctua NT-H2 is priced at £12.11, reflecting its premium-grade formulation and added features, such as the thermal paste guard and cleaning wipes. While it is more expensive, the added convenience and performance tailored for AM5 CPUs may justify the higher cost for specific users. Ultimately, the choice between the two may depend on how much value users place on convenience and tailored performance versus a lower price point.
Brand Trust and Reputation
Brand reputation plays a crucial role in consumer decision-making, and both Thermal Grizzly and Noctua have established themselves as trusted names in the cooling solutions market. Thermal Grizzly is often regarded as a top choice among overclockers and performance enthusiasts, thanks to their focus on high-performance products like the Kryonaut.
Conversely, Noctua is renowned for its commitment to quality and long-term stability, making it a favourite among users who value reliability and ease of use. The NT-H2’s second-generation status adds to its credibility, as it builds upon the success of its predecessor, the NT-H1. Both brands have their loyal followers, but the decision may ultimately hinge on individual preferences regarding performance versus ease of application.
Which should you buy?
The choice between the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and Noctua NT-H2 3.5g AM5 Edition largely depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you are an enthusiast seeking the highest thermal conductivity for demanding applications, the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut at £6.95 is an excellent choice. It excels in performance, versatility, and ease of application with its spatula.
However, if you prefer a product designed specifically for AM5 CPUs with added convenience features, the Noctua NT-H2, priced at £12.11, may be worth the investment. Its long-term stability, ease of application, and trusted brand reputation cater well to users who value reliability and target-specific performance. Ultimately, both products are strong contenders in the thermal paste market, so your decision should align with your cooling needs and budget.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

