Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet 38x38x0.2mm vs ARCTIC TP-3: Premium Performance Thermal Pad
Updated August 2026 — The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet offers superior thermal conductivity and reusability, while the ARCTIC TP-3 is a more budget-friendly option with versatile applications.
The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet offers superior thermal conductivity and reusability, while the ARCTIC TP-3 is a more budget-friendly option with versatile applications.
Why Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet 38x38x0.2mm is better
thermal conductivity
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet excels in heat transfer efficiency.
reusability
KryoSheet can be reused, unlike the TP-3.
brand reputation
Thermal Grizzly is favored by PC enthusiasts.
Why ARCTIC TP-3: Premium Performance Thermal Pad is better
price
ARCTIC TP-3 is more affordable.
versatility
TP-3 can be cut to size for various applications.
installation
TP-3 is suitable for compact setups.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet 38x38x0.2mm | ARCTIC TP-3: Premium Performance Thermal Pad |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Thermal Grizzly | ARCTIC |
| Price (GBP) | £18.99 | £11.95 |
| Electrical Insulation | Yes | Yes |
| Reusable | Yes | No |
| Softness | Medium | Soft |
| Heat Conductivity | Excellent | High |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Thermal Pads
When it comes to cooling solutions for electronic components, choosing the right thermal pad is essential. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet and the ARCTIC TP-3 both offer unique features and benefits aimed at enhancing thermal conductivity. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet is priced at £18.99, while the ARCTIC TP-3 is more affordable at £11.95. Understanding their specific attributes can help users make an informed decision based on their needs.
Compatibility and Application
The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet has a 38 x 38 mm format, making it broadly compatible with various desktop components. This versatility means it can effectively replace thermal paste, providing a clean and reusable application. In contrast, the ARCTIC TP-3 is designed to be mouldable and can be easily cut to size, making it suitable for a range of applications, including RAM and graphic cards. However, the installation process for the ARCTIC TP-3 can be more demanding due to its very low hardness, suggesting that users should prepare for a more involved setup.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal conductivity is a critical factor in thermal pads, and both products excel in this regard. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet boasts excellent thermal conductivity, which ensures efficient heat transfer. While specific numerical values for thermal conductivity are not provided, the emphasis on performance suggests it rivals other high-quality options. Meanwhile, the ARCTIC TP-3 minimises thermal resistance due to its thinner profile, which enhances its heat conduction properties. Users should consider their specific cooling needs when determining which product will perform better in their scenario.
Safety and Handling
Safety is paramount when dealing with electronic components, and both thermal pads are designed with this in mind. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet is electrically non-conductive, making it safe for use with delicate electronic components. Similarly, the ARCTIC TP-3 is also electrically insulating and contains no metal particles, ensuring safe handling. This feature is crucial for users looking to avoid potential damage during installation or maintenance.
Performance in Different Environments
Performance can vary based on environmental conditions, and both products are tailored for specific applications. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet offers a reusable application that can be advantageous in scenarios requiring frequent component changes. In contrast, the ARCTIC TP-3 is particularly effective in situations where there are height differences between closely spaced chips. This adaptability can make it the preferred choice for users working with compact setups where thermal efficiency is critical.
Price Consideration
Price is often a deciding factor when selecting thermal pads, and here, the ARCTIC TP-3 presents a more budget-friendly option at £11.95 compared to the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet's £18.99. This difference of £7.04 may be significant for users seeking to minimise expenses while still achieving adequate thermal management. However, the higher cost of the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet may be justified for those prioritising reusability and superior thermal conductivity.
Brand Reputation and Customer Support
Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and both Thermal Grizzly and ARCTIC have established themselves as reliable manufacturers in the cooling solutions market. Thermal Grizzly is known for its high-performance products, particularly among PC enthusiasts and gamers. ARCTIC, on the other hand, is often recognised for providing value-driven solutions that do not compromise on performance. Users may want to consider brand loyalty and past experiences when choosing between these two options.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet and the ARCTIC TP-3 ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you require a product that offers broad compatibility and the ability to reuse, the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet may be worth the higher price of £18.99. However, if budget constraints are a priority and you need a versatile thermal pad that performs well in various applications, the ARCTIC TP-3 at £11.95 is a strong contender. Each product has its strengths, and understanding these will help you make the best choice for your cooling requirements.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

