TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 Infinity Mirror ARGB PWM PC Fans 120mm Black vs ARCTIC F12 - PC Fan
Updated August 2026 — The TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 offers superior performance and aesthetics, while the ARCTIC F12 is a budget-friendly option with lower noise levels. Choose based on your priorities.
The TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 offers superior performance and aesthetics, while the ARCTIC F12 is a budget-friendly option with lower noise levels. Choose based on your priorities.
Why TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 Infinity Mirror ARGB PWM PC Fans 120mm Black is better
higher airflow
TZMRIT offers 68 CFM vs ARCTIC's 53 CFM
aesthetic design
TZMRIT features an infinite mirror effect
installation ease
TZMRIT has a daisy chain design for faster setup
Why ARCTIC F12 - PC Fan is better
lower noise
ARCTIC operates at 0.3 Sone
cost-effective
ARCTIC priced at £5.78 vs TZMRIT's £19.99
long lifespan
ARCTIC's Fluid Dynamic Bearing enhances durability
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 Infinity Mirror ARGB PWM PC Fans 120mm Black | ARCTIC F12 - PC Fan |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | TZMRIT | ARCTIC |
| Design | ARGB Mirror | Traditional |
| Bearing Type | Hydraulic | Fluid Dynamic |
| Daisy Chain | Yes | No |
| Two-way Install | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
The TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 Infinity Mirror ARGB PWM PC Fan features a striking design with an infinite mirror effect, while the ARCTIC F12 has a more traditional look. The TZMRIT fan incorporates an innovative daisy chain design that enhances installation flexibility and speed, showcasing a unique three-sided mirror that produces captivating ARGB lighting effects. In contrast, the ARCTIC F12 focuses on a straightforward and functional design, prioritising efficiency over aesthetics. This fan’s blades are engineered to optimise airflow, but it lacks the visual flair of the TZMRIT. If aesthetics are a priority, the TZMRIT stands out significantly in this category.
Performance
Performance-wise, the TZMRIT fan offers impressive specifications with an airflow of up to 68 CFM, which is higher than the ARCTIC F12's maximum airflow of 53 CFM. This superior airflow means that the TZMRIT is better suited for demanding cooling scenarios, ensuring efficient heat dissipation. Additionally, the unique shape and angle of the TZMRIT's fan blades are based on biomimetics, designed to enhance wind pressure and air volume. The ARCTIC F12, while effective, operates at a fan speed of 1350 rpm, delivering decent airflow but not matching the TZMRIT's higher performance metrics.
Noise Levels
When it comes to noise levels, the ARCTIC F12 is notably quieter, producing only 0.3 Sone during operation. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritise a silent computing experience. The TZMRIT fan, while designed to reduce noise through its hydraulic bearings and silicone padding, does not specify its noise output. Given the ARCTIC’s low noise rating, it may be more appealing for those who are sensitive to sound, especially in quieter environments.
Build Quality and Lifespan
The build quality of both fans is commendable, but they employ different technologies to enhance longevity. The TZMRIT fan utilises hydraulic bearings that are designed to improve service life and reduce wear and noise. On the other hand, the ARCTIC F12 features a Fluid Dynamic Bearing that includes an oil capsule to prevent lubricant leakage, offering a lifespan comparable to that of a sleeve bearing while maintaining quiet operation. The ARCTIC F12 may have an edge in terms of the longevity of its bearings, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.
Installation and Flexibility
Installation is a key consideration for many users, and the TZMRIT fan excels in this area with its daisy chain design and sliding pin-to-pin locking mechanism. This innovative approach allows for faster and easier installation, especially in cases where multiple fans are being installed. In comparison, the ARCTIC F12 allows for two-way installation, enabling users to either draw cool air into the case or expel warm air out. While the ARCTIC provides flexibility in airflow direction, the installation process may not be as streamlined as the TZMRIT’s.
Price Point
Price is a significant factor in any comparison, and there is a stark difference between the two products. The TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 is priced at £19.99, reflecting its advanced design and features. Conversely, the ARCTIC F12 is substantially less expensive at only £5.78, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. This considerable price gap may influence a buyer's decision, especially if they are looking for functional cooling without the premium features offered by the TZMRIT.
Target Audience
The target audience for each fan differs based on their respective features and pricing. The TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 is aimed at gamers and PC builders who value aesthetics and high performance, willing to invest more for superior cooling and visual appeal. Meanwhile, the ARCTIC F12 caters to budget-conscious users who need reliable cooling without frills, making it suitable for standard builds or users who prioritise function over form. Each fan serves distinct consumer needs, depending on performance expectations and budget considerations.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the TZMRIT Interstellar-V2 and the ARCTIC F12 boils down to personal preferences and specific needs. If you are seeking superior airflow, striking aesthetics, and advanced installation features, the TZMRIT is the clear winner, despite its higher price of £19.99. However, if you are looking for a cost-effective, quiet, and reliable fan for basic cooling needs, the ARCTIC F12 at £5.78 is an excellent choice. Assess your requirements carefully to determine which fan aligns best with your setup and budget.
versusfinder.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme and the Amazon EU Associates Programme. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

