YONEX Tennis Frame VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 vs YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305

Head Size and Stringing Pattern

Both the YONEX Tennis Frame VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 and the YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305 feature identical head sizes of 98 square inches and the same stringing pattern of 16×19. This means they offer comparable sweet spots and ball control, making them equally suitable for players who prefer a balanced mix of power and precision. The consistency in these specs ensures that neither racket has an edge over the other in terms of playability related to head size or string tension distribution.

Weight Comparison

The YONEX Tennis Frame VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 weighs 315 grams, while the YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305 is lighter at 305 grams — a difference of exactly 10 grams. This slight weight reduction can influence swing speed and maneuverability, giving the EZONE98 model a marginal advantage for players seeking faster swings and better court coverage. However, the VCORE 98TOUR’s extra 10 grams may appeal to those who prefer more stability and power on groundstrokes, especially if they have strong arm strength and consistent technique.

Price Difference and Value

The YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305 is priced at ₹14,869, whereas the VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 costs ₹15,154 — a direct price difference of ₹285. This makes the EZONE98 about 1.9% cheaper than its counterpart. Over time, this small savings could be meaningful for budget-conscious players. Additionally, the EZONE98 has a slightly lower average price over the last 30 days (₹15,002 vs ₹15,099), suggesting it might be more consistently available at competitive rates.

Sales Performance and Popularity

In terms of sales ranking, the YONEX Tennis Frame VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 holds a bestseller rank of 26, indicating strong market demand and popularity among Indian tennis players. In contrast, the YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305 ranks at 47, which still places it among the top-selling rackets but slightly behind. This gap suggests that the VCORE 98TOUR has stronger consumer traction currently, possibly due to brand recognition or endorsement visibility. However, both models remain highly visible and widely sought after in the premium segment.

Grip Size Consistency

Both rackets come with a G3 grip size, ensuring that players who prefer this standard grip diameter will find a perfect fit without needing to change grips or use additional tape. This uniformity in grip size eliminates any variation in handling or comfort between the two models. Whether you're switching from one racket to the other or upgrading your current setup, the G3 size offers consistent feel and control, making it easier to adapt between the two frames.

Brand and Model Positioning

YONEX markets both rackets under distinct performance lines: the VCORE 98TOUR series is known for its stability and control, ideal for advanced players who prioritize precision. The EZONE98 line, on the other hand, emphasizes power and responsiveness, often preferred by aggressive baseliners. While both share similar dimensions and string patterns, their underlying design philosophies differ slightly — the VCORE 98TOUR leans toward control, while the EZONE98 leans toward energy transfer. These subtle differences are reflected in how each performs during extended rallies and high-impact shots.

Which should you buy?

If you prioritise control, stability, and a higher bestseller rank, the YONEX Tennis Frame VCORE 98TOUR Scarlet G3 315 is the better choice — especially if you value proven popularity and a slightly heavier frame for added power. However, if you’re looking for a lighter, more agile racket that’s also ₹285 cheaper and still maintains excellent performance metrics, the YONEX Tennis Frame EZONE98 Aqua Night Black/G3 305 delivers superior value. Ultimately, choose based on your playing style: go for the VCORE 98TOUR if you want dominance through control, or pick the EZONE98 if you prefer speed and cost efficiency.