vsversusfinder

Sigma 16- vs Meike

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 16- wins on focal length and versatility, Meike wins on price and aperture.

The Sigma 16-300mm offers versatility for various photography styles, while the Meike 85mm excels in portrait photography with its low-light performance and affordability.

Why Sigma 16- is better

Versatility

Sigma covers a wide focal range from 16mm to 300mm.

Zoom Capability

Sigma allows for quick framing adjustments without changing lenses.

Build Quality

Sigma is designed for regular use with robust construction.

Why Meike is better

Price

Meike is significantly cheaper at $229.99.

Low-Light Performance

Meike's F1.8 aperture excels in dim conditions.

Bokeh Quality

Meike produces beautiful background blur with its 11 diaphragm blades.

Overall score

Sigma 16-
85
Meike
75

Specifications

SpecSigma 16-Meike
Max ApertureF3.5-6.7F1.8
Focal Length16-300mm85mm
Weight600g500g
AutofocusStandardSTM
CompatibilityVariousSony E

Dimension comparison

Sigma 16-Meike

Overview of the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

The Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS is a versatile zoom lens that offers a broad focal range, making it an excellent choice for various photography styles. With its price set at $694.00, it is significantly more expensive than the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II, which is priced at $229.99. This lens is ideal for photographers seeking flexibility in their shooting, as it can handle everything from wide-angle landscapes to close-up portraits with ease.

The lens features a focal length range of 16-300mm and an aperture of F3.5-6.7, allowing for decent performance in various lighting conditions. Although it may not excel in low-light situations compared to faster lenses, it still provides a good balance for general photography needs. Its build quality and optical design cater to photographers looking for a reliable all-in-one solution.

Key Features of the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II

The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is a specialized portrait lens known for its large aperture and high-resolution capabilities. Priced at $229.99, it is about 67% cheaper than the Sigma 16-300mm, making it an attractive option for photographers on a budget. This lens excels in producing beautiful bokeh effects, thanks to its 11 diaphragm blades and F1.8 aperture.

Constructed with 11 elements in 7 groups, the lens is optimized for sharpness and clarity, suitable for high-resolution 8K photography. Its compatibility with Sony E mount cameras enhances its appeal, particularly for those who shoot portraits or need a reliable telephoto lens for specific applications. The lightweight and compact build further supports ease of use, especially during extended shooting sessions.

Versatility in Photography

When it comes to versatility, the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS takes the lead. Its extensive focal range allows photographers to capture a wide array of subjects, from sweeping landscapes to intimate portraits. This makes it an ideal option for travel photographers or anyone who wants to cover multiple genres without changing lenses frequently.

In contrast, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is less versatile but excels in specific scenarios. Its fixed focal length is perfect for portrait photography, architectural shots, and landscape images where detail and depth of field are critical. While it can be limiting for some, its strength lies in producing striking portraits with excellent background separation and sharpness.

Low-Light Performance

The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II significantly outperforms the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS in low-light conditions due to its wider aperture. The F1.8 aperture allows more light to hit the sensor, which is essential for capturing sharp images in dimly lit environments. This feature makes the Meike an excellent choice for evening portraits or indoor events where lighting may be challenging.

Conversely, the Sigma's maximum aperture of F3.5-6.7 can be limiting in low-light situations. While it is suitable for outdoor photography during the day, it may require higher ISO settings or slower shutter speeds in darker conditions, potentially leading to noise or motion blur. For photographers who frequently shoot in low-light environments, the Meike lens offers a distinct advantage.

Autofocus and Usability

The Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS and the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II both feature autofocus systems, but they cater to different user experiences. The Meike lens includes a stepping motor (STM) that ensures silent and smooth focusing, which is especially beneficial for video recording or capturing candid moments. This lens also supports electronic aperture adjustments and EXIF information transmission, enhancing its usability.

On the other hand, while details about the autofocus performance of the Sigma lens are not specified, its zoom capability offers flexibility for framing shots without the need for manual adjustments. However, the lack of advanced autofocus features may limit its effectiveness in fast-paced shooting scenarios compared to the Meike lens, which is tailored for precise focusing.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II impresses with its compact and lightweight design, making it easy for photographers to carry it around during long sessions. The lens elements are multi-coated to reduce flare and ghosting, and they feature fingerprint- and oil-resistant coatings, adding to its durability and ease of maintenance.

The Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS is also well-built, designed to withstand the rigors of regular use. However, its larger size and weight may be a consideration for photographers who prioritize portability. Ultimately, both lenses are constructed to serve their respective photographic purposes, but the Meike’s design offers an edge in terms of convenience and ease of use.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS and the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is quite significant. The Sigma lens retails for $694.00, while the Meike lens is priced at $229.99. This makes the Meike about 67% cheaper, making it a more accessible option for hobbyists and professionals alike who are working within a budget.

For those who prioritize versatility and are willing to invest in a more expensive lens, the Sigma may be the better choice. However, for photographers focusing primarily on portraiture and desiring high-quality images without breaking the bank, the Meike lens presents a compelling case.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS and the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II ultimately depends on your specific photographic needs. If you require versatility and the ability to shoot a wide range of subjects, the Sigma lens stands out as a comprehensive option. However, if you're focused on portrait photography and value low-light performance, the Meike lens offers exceptional quality at a significantly lower price point. Consider your shooting style and budget to make the best choice for your photography journey.