vsversusfinder

Sigma 16- vs Tamron 17-

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 16- wins on zoom, Tamron 17- wins on aperture and portability.

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is the better choice for those prioritizing optical performance and portability at a lower price, while the Sigma 16-300mm offers greater versatility in focal length.

Why Sigma 16- is better

Zoom Range

Sigma offers a wider zoom range of 16-300mm.

Versatility

Sigma is suitable for various photography styles.

Price

Sigma is a versatile option for those needing flexibility.

Why Tamron 17- is better

Aperture

Tamron has a constant f/2.8 aperture.

Build Quality

Tamron features moisture-resistant construction.

Weight

Tamron is lighter and more portable.

Overall score

Sigma 16-
75
Tamron 17-
85

Specifications

SpecSigma 16-Tamron 17-
Focal Length16-300mm17-70mm
Max Aperturef/3.5-6.7f/2.8
VCNoYes
Moisture ResistantNoYes
ElementsUnknown16 elements

Dimension comparison

Sigma 16-Tamron 17-

Overview of the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

The Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS is a versatile lens that offers a broad focal range, making it suitable for various photography styles. With a current price of $694.00, it targets photographers who need flexibility in their shooting options. The lens features a focal length of 16-300mm, providing an extensive zoom range that can capture everything from wide-angle landscapes to detailed close-ups. This lens is designed for those who value convenience and adaptability in their gear.

Overview of the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is a high-speed zoom lens priced at $599.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the Sigma option. This lens stands out for its constant maximum aperture of f/2.8 throughout its zoom range, enabling better low-light performance and depth of field control. Ideal for everyday photography, it covers a focal length equivalent of 25.5-105mm in full-frame terms, making it an excellent choice for a variety of shooting scenarios, including portraits and landscapes.

Focal Length and Zoom Range

The Sigma 16-300mm boasts an impressive zoom range, making it suitable for both wide-angle and telephoto shots. This lens reaches a maximum focal length of 300mm, which provides significant versatility for capturing distant subjects. In contrast, the Tamron 17-70mm offers a more modest zoom range but excels in its f/2.8 aperture, which allows for exceptional image quality and low-light performance. The choice here largely depends on whether you prioritize a wider zoom range or a faster aperture for better control over exposure and depth of field.

Optical Performance

Both lenses deliver impressive optical performance, but they cater to different needs. The Sigma lens is designed for a broad range of scenarios, making it versatile but potentially sacrificing some image quality at extreme focal lengths. The Tamron lens, however, features advanced lens construction with 16 elements in 12 groups, including two GM lens elements and one hybrid aspherical element, which enhances its optical performance significantly. This makes the Tamron a strong contender for photographers who prioritize high-quality images over a wider zoom range.

Build Quality and Features

The Tamron 17-70mm lens is built with moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, enhancing its durability and usability in various conditions. In contrast, the Sigma 16-300mm does not specify such features, which may affect its performance in adverse weather. Additionally, the Tamron lens includes Vibration Compensation technology that works effectively with Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras, making it an excellent choice for video shooting as well. This focus on build quality and stabilization gives the Tamron a practical edge for outdoor and dynamic shooting environments.

Weight and Portability

Portability is essential for photographers on the go, and the Tamron 17-70mm excels in this area. Being a compact lens, it is lighter and easier to carry compared to the Sigma 16-300mm. The Sigma, with its extensive zoom range, is likely bulkier, which could be a drawback for those who prioritize lightweight gear. Therefore, for photographers who frequently travel or engage in extended shooting sessions, the Tamron offers an advantage in terms of weight and ease of use.

Price Comparison

The Sigma 16-300mm is priced at $694.00, while the Tamron 17-70mm costs $599.00. This difference of $95 makes the Tamron a more budget-friendly option, especially for those who need a reliable lens without breaking the bank. The Tamron’s lower price, combined with its high-speed constant aperture and excellent build quality, presents a compelling case for photographers seeking value for money.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you value a wide zoom range and versatility, the Sigma might be the better fit. However, if you prioritize optical performance, low-light capabilities, and portability at a lower price point, the Tamron is undoubtedly the superior choice. Given its features and price, the Tamron lens stands out as an excellent investment for Sony APS-C mirrorless camera users.