Sigma 24- vs Canon EFS 55-
Updated July 2026 — Sigma 24- wins on price and weight, Canon EFS 55- wins on focal length and aperture.
The Sigma lens offers superior image quality and versatility, while the Canon lens is a budget-friendly option with good performance for beginners.
Why Sigma 24- is better
Image Quality
High sharpness throughout the entire image
Aperture
Constant F2.8 aperture for better low-light performance
Versatility
Wide focal length range for various photography styles
Why Canon EFS 55- is better
Price
Significantly more affordable at $317.59
Weight
Compact and lightweight design for portability
Image Stabilization
4-stop compensation Image Stabilizer technology
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 24- | Canon EFS 55- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Sigma | Canon |
| Max Aperture | F2.8 | F4-5.6 |
| Focal Length | 24-70mm | 55-250mm |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Weight | 1000g | 400g |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E is a premium lens priced at $1,319.00, while the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens is significantly more budget-friendly at $317.59. The price difference is about 76%, making the Canon lens a much more accessible option for photographers on a budget. However, the Sigma lens offers high sharpness throughout the entire image, catering to professionals seeking superior image quality.
Design and Build Quality
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II boasts a robust design that is typical of professional-grade lenses, ensuring durability and reliability in various shooting conditions. In contrast, the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it an excellent choice for photographers looking for portability. While the Sigma lens is built for high performance, the Canon lens excels in being user-friendly and easy to carry, allowing for extended shooting sessions without fatigue.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 offers a versatile focal length range, allowing photographers to capture a variety of subjects, from wide landscapes to intimate portraits. This lens is ideal for those who need a multi-purpose zoom. On the other hand, the Canon EFS 55-250mm lens provides a much longer focal length of 55-250mm, equivalent to 88-400mm in 35mm format. This makes it particularly suited for telephoto photography, such as wildlife and sports, where distance is crucial. Each lens caters to different photographic needs, with the Sigma focusing on versatility and the Canon excelling in reach.
Aperture and Low Light Performance
The Sigma lens features a constant aperture of F2.8, offering excellent low-light performance and the ability to achieve a shallow depth of field. This makes it ideal for indoor photography or low-light environments, allowing for better light capture without sacrificing image quality. In contrast, the Canon EFS 55-250mm has a variable aperture of F4-5.6, which can limit its performance in low-light situations. Therefore, for photographers who frequently shoot in challenging lighting conditions, the Sigma lens stands out as the more capable option.
Image Stabilization
The Canon EFS 55-250mm lens incorporates Canon's 4-stop compensation Image Stabilizer technology, which is beneficial for reducing blurriness caused by camera shake, especially at longer focal lengths. This feature allows the use of slower shutter speeds with minimal impact on image clarity. The Sigma 24-70mm, while not explicitly mentioned to have image stabilization, focuses on sharpness throughout the image. For those who prioritize stabilization, the Canon lens could provide a significant advantage in handheld shooting scenarios.
Target Audience
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 is aimed at professional photographers and serious enthusiasts who demand high image quality and versatility in their lenses. Its price and features reflect its status as a premium product designed for critical applications. Conversely, the Canon EFS 55-250mm lens is targeted towards beginner and intermediate photographers who are looking for an affordable lens that offers good performance for everyday use. Thus, the choice between these two lenses largely depends on the photographer's level of expertise and specific photographic needs.
Price Comparison
With a price of $1,319.00, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II represents a significant investment compared to the Canon EFS 55-250mm, which is priced at $317.59. This means that the Sigma lens is about 76% more expensive. While the higher cost may deter some photographers, those who need the advanced features and superior image quality may find the Sigma lens worth the investment. In contrast, the Canon lens offers excellent value for those who need a reliable telephoto option at a fraction of the cost.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II and the Canon EFS 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you're a professional or serious enthusiast seeking high sharpness, versatility, and low-light performance, the Sigma lens is the way to go, despite its higher price. However, if you're a beginner or someone looking for a more affordable telephoto option for general photography, the Canon lens provides great value with its impressive focal length and image stabilization features. Consider your shooting style and budget to make the best choice for your photography journey.

