Sigma 24- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Sigma 24- wins on aperture and sharpness, Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and zoom range.
The Sigma lens excels in low-light performance and sharpness, while the Canon lens offers versatility with its broader zoom range and image stabilization.
Why Sigma 24- is better
Aperture
Sigma has a constant f/2.8 aperture for better low-light performance.
Sharpness
Sigma lens delivers high sharpness throughout the entire image.
Price
Sigma is priced at $1,319.00, making it cheaper than Canon.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a broader zoom range from 24-105mm.
Image Stabilization
Canon features optical image stabilization for better handheld shooting.
Portability
Canon's compact design makes it easier to carry.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 24- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,319.00 | $1,399.00 |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Weight | 1.5 lbs | 1.3 lbs |
| Focus Type | Auto | Auto |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
When comparing the 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens, both lenses cater to enthusiasts and professionals with distinct strengths. The Sigma lens is priced at $1,319.00, while the Canon lens is slightly higher at $1,399.00, making the Sigma about 6% cheaper. This price difference could influence a potential buyer's decision depending on their budget and needs.
Brand and Build Quality
Both Sigma and Canon are reputable brands in the photography industry, known for producing high-quality lenses. The 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E from Sigma prides itself on delivering high sharpness throughout the entire image. Meanwhile, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM emphasizes its compact design and premium build quality, being part of Canon’s L-Series lineup. While Sigma focuses on optical excellence, Canon offers a robust design with a bright, constant f/4.0 aperture, which may appeal to those looking for versatility in varying lighting conditions.
Optical Performance
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 is designed with a constant f/2.8 aperture, which allows for excellent low-light performance and depth of field control. This feature is essential for photographers who need to maintain sharp images while minimizing background distractions. On the other hand, the Canon RF 24-105mm features a constant f/4.0 aperture, which, while slightly less capable in low-light settings compared to the Sigma, still provides reliable performance for most situations. The Canon lens also benefits from a five-stop effective image stabilizer, which helps reduce camera shake, making it an excellent choice for handheld shooting.
Versatility and Use Cases
The versatility of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is evident in its broader zoom range, spanning from wide-angle to short telephoto. This lens is ideal for a variety of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. In comparison, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 offers a slightly narrower zoom range but excels in its sharpness and low-light capabilities. Photographers who frequently switch between different styles may find the Canon lens more accommodating, while those focusing on portraits or events may prefer the Sigma for its superior aperture.
Stabilization Features
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is equipped with optical image stabilization, which enhances its usability in challenging conditions by providing up to five stops of shake correction. This is particularly beneficial for photographers who often shoot handheld or in low-light situations. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 does not explicitly mention image stabilization, which may make it less ideal for those who rely heavily on this feature. Therefore, if stabilization is a priority, the Canon lens has a clear advantage.
Price and Value
With the Sigma lens priced at $1,319.00 and the Canon lens at $1,399.00, potential buyers will notice a price difference of $80. This translates to about 6% less for the Sigma, which may make it a more attractive option for budget-conscious photographers. However, the decision should also consider the specific features that each lens offers, as the additional cost of the Canon lens might be justified by its broader zoom range and image stabilization capabilities.
Portability and Design
Portability can be a significant factor in lens selection, especially for photographers on the go. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is noted for its compact design, making it easier to carry during extended shooting sessions. Conversely, while the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 is also designed with usability in mind, its larger size may be less convenient for some users. Those who prioritize portability may find the Canon lens more suitable for their needs.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens ultimately hinges on individual preferences and shooting styles. The Sigma lens offers superior low-light performance and sharpness, making it an excellent choice for portrait and event photographers. In contrast, the Canon lens provides versatility with its broader zoom range and built-in image stabilization, making it ideal for a wide array of photography scenarios. Weighing the features and price, buyers should consider their specific needs and the types of photography they engage in to make the best choice.

