vsversusfinder

Sigma 24- vs Canon RF100-

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 24- wins on price and sharpness, Canon RF100- wins on stabilization and weight.

The Sigma lens excels in sharpness and versatility, while the Canon lens offers better stabilization and a longer zoom range at a lower price.

Why Sigma 24- is better

Image Quality

Sigma provides high sharpness throughout the image.

Versatility

Sigma is suitable for various photography styles.

Build Quality

Sigma is robust for professional use.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $699.

Zoom Range

Canon offers a versatile 100-400mm range.

Stabilization

Canon has superior image stabilization features.

Overall score

Sigma 24-
85
Canon RF100-
90

Specifications

SpecSigma 24-Canon RF100-
Focal Length24-70mm100-400mm
ApertureF2.8F5.6-8
AutofocusResponsiveNano USM
Image StabilizationNoneOptical IS
WeightHeavyLight

Dimension comparison

Sigma 24-Canon RF100-

Overview of the Lenses

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E is a versatile standard zoom lens, while the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a compact telephoto lens. Each lens serves different photographic needs, making them suitable for distinct types of photography. The Sigma lens, priced at $1,319.00, is ideal for general photography, offering high sharpness throughout the image. In contrast, the Canon lens comes in at a significantly lower price of $699.00, providing a longer focal range perfect for wildlife and sports photography.

Image Quality

When it comes to image quality, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II excels with its high sharpness across the entire image frame. This characteristic makes it an excellent choice for portrait, landscape, and event photography, where clarity is paramount. The Canon RF100-400mm, while also offering impressive quality, focuses on versatility with its zoom range from 100mm to 400mm. It includes a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element to correct chromatic aberration, ensuring images are crisp and colorful. Users can expect high image quality from both lenses, but the Sigma may edge out in sharpness for wider shots.

Versatility and Use Cases

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is designed for a variety of shooting scenarios, making it a go-to lens for many photographers. Its focal length range allows for everything from wide-angle landscapes to tight portraits. On the other hand, the Canon RF100-400mm is tailored for specific uses, particularly in wildlife and sports photography, thanks to its extensive zoom range and lightweight design. The RF100-400mm is suitable for capturing distant subjects effortlessly, which is not something the Sigma can do. Each lens has its unique versatility, catering to different photographic needs.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance is a critical aspect for many photographers, and both lenses deliver. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is designed to be responsive, making it reliable for capturing fast-moving subjects in various lighting conditions. Meanwhile, the Canon RF100-400mm features Canon’s Nano USM technology, providing high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus. This is particularly beneficial in wildlife photography, where silent operation can make a significant difference. Both lenses offer solid autofocus capabilities, though the Canon may have the advantage in scenarios requiring quick adjustments at varying distances.

Stabilization Features

Stabilization features significantly impact the usability of lenses, particularly in handheld shooting scenarios. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II does not explicitly mention image stabilization in its specifications, which may limit its effectiveness in low-light conditions or when shooting at slower shutter speeds. Conversely, the Canon RF100-400mm boasts an Optical Image Stabilizer capable of up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, and up to 6 stops when paired with Canon's EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization. This makes the Canon lens a more favorable option for photographers who frequently shoot in challenging environments.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, both lenses are designed with professional use in mind. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is robust and built to withstand rigorous use, which is essential for event and travel photographers. The Canon RF100-400mm, while compact and lightweight—similar in size to the EF 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 IS II USM—also ensures durability without compromising portability. Photographers who prioritize a lighter setup for travel and wildlife shooting may prefer the Canon lens due to its lightweight design, which enhances mobility during long shoots.

Price Comparison

Price is a significant factor for many buyers, and here there is a clear difference between the two lenses. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is priced at $1,319.00, while the Canon RF100-400mm is considerably cheaper at $699.00, making it about 47% less expensive. This price difference can be a decisive factor for photographers on a budget or those seeking a high-quality lens without breaking the bank. While the Sigma offers exceptional quality, the Canon lens provides excellent value for those needing a telephoto option.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E and the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you require a versatile standard zoom lens with high sharpness for various photography styles, the Sigma is the better choice. However, if you are focused on telephoto photography, particularly wildlife or sports, the Canon lens offers an extensive zoom range, superior stabilization features, and a significantly lower price point. Ultimately, your choice should be guided by your shooting style and budget, ensuring you select a lens that complements your photographic endeavors.