vsversusfinder

Sigma 24- vs SIRUI

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 24- leads on price and weight.

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II offers versatility and high image quality, while the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens provides unique cinematic features at a lower price.

Why Sigma 24- is better

Price

Sigma lens is more versatile despite higher cost.

Image Quality

Sigma lens has high sharpness throughout the image.

Versatility

Sigma lens covers a wider focal range.

Why SIRUI is better

Price

SIRUI lens is significantly cheaper.

Cinematic Features

SIRUI lens offers anamorphic capabilities.

Weight

SIRUI lens is lighter and more portable.

Overall score

Sigma 24-
85
SIRUI
75

Specifications

SpecSigma 24-SIRUI
BrandSigmaSirui
TypeZoomPrime
AutofocusYesYes
Image CircleFull FrameSuper 35
ConstructionProfessionalCompact

Dimension comparison

Sigma 24-SIRUI

Price Comparison

The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is priced at $1,319.00, while the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens is significantly cheaper at $599.00, making it about 55% less expensive. This price difference is substantial, especially for videographers and photographers on a budget. The Sigma lens, targeting professionals seeking versatility with its zoom range, comes at a premium, while the SIRUI lens offers a compelling value for cinematic applications. This affordability can be particularly appealing to those venturing into anamorphic filming or those needing a capable wide-angle lens without breaking the bank.

Image Quality

Image quality is a critical factor when choosing a lens, and both products excel in their respective domains. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II boasts high sharpness throughout the entire image, making it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize detail and clarity. In contrast, the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens features a 1.33x squeeze factor, allowing for an immersive cinematic view with a 2.35:1 widescreen ratio. This unique property provides filmmakers with an expansive perspective while maintaining excellent image clarity, especially suited for landscapes and tight indoor spaces. Each lens offers distinct advantages for different photographic and videographic needs.

Versatility

In terms of versatility, the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II shines with its focal range of 24-70mm, allowing for various shooting scenarios, from portraits to landscapes. This zoom capability makes it an excellent all-rounder for both photographers and videographers. Conversely, the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 is a prime lens designed specifically for cinematic use, providing a fixed wide-angle perspective that excels in specific applications. While the Sigma lens adapts to various shooting styles, the SIRUI lens focuses on delivering a unique cinematic experience, appealing more to filmmakers than general photographers.

Autofocus Features

Autofocus performance is a key consideration, especially for moving subjects or dynamic shooting conditions. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is equipped with advanced autofocus technology that ensures sharp focus across the frame, but specific details regarding its autofocus capabilities are not highlighted. On the other hand, the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens features selectable manual and autofocus options powered by a precision STM stepping motor. This lens offers eye-tracking capabilities, an AF/MF switch, and autofocus lock, providing filmmakers with complete creative control. This distinction makes the SIRUI lens particularly beneficial for video creators who require reliable autofocus functionality.

Low-Light Performance

Low-light performance is crucial for both photography and videography, and both lenses offer strong capabilities. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II, with its constant f/2.8 aperture, allows for a significant amount of light, making it suitable for various lighting conditions. Meanwhile, the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 lens features an ultra-fast T1.8 aperture, which further enhances its low-light performance. This aperture allows more light to enter, reducing ISO requirements and facilitating sharper focus in night scenes. For creators working in challenging lighting situations, the SIRUI lens provides excellent depth of field control and soft bokeh, making it a strong contender for low-light videography.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses are designed with usability and practicality in mind, although their purposes dictate their form factors. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is built to withstand the rigors of professional use, yet specific construction details are not provided. The SIRUI 20mm T1.8, weighing only 480g (1.06lb), is compact and lightweight, making it suitable for handheld and gimbal work. Its design caters to independent creators and professional productions that demand mobility without sacrificing visual quality. While the Sigma lens is likely more robust for varied shooting conditions, the SIRUI lens excels in portability, appealing to those who prioritize weight and size in their gear.

Intended Use

The intended use of each lens significantly influences their design and features. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is versatile for both photography and videography, making it an ideal choice for hybrid shooters who need a reliable lens for various situations. In contrast, the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens is specifically crafted for cinematic applications, focusing on delivering unique visual storytelling through its anamorphic design. Filmmakers looking to create expansive visuals will find the SIRUI lens more aligned with their creative needs, while photographers may prefer the Sigma for its adaptability across different genres.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II and the SIRUI 20mm T1.8 Anamorphic Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you seek a versatile, high-quality lens suitable for various photographic styles, the Sigma is the better option despite its higher price. However, if your focus is on cinematic videography and you require an affordable lens that offers unique features like an anamorphic squeeze, the SIRUI lens is an excellent choice. Consider your shooting preferences, budget, and the type of content you plan to create when making your decision.