Sigma 24- vs Tamron 35-
Updated July 2026 — Tamron 35- leads on autofocus and weight.
The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II offers a versatile focal range at a lower price, while the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 excels in portrait and travel photography with its extended zoom range.
Why Sigma 24- is better
Price
Sigma is about 12% cheaper.
Focal Range
Standard zoom range suitable for various photography styles.
Sharpness
High sharpness throughout the entire image.
Why Tamron 35- is better
Zoom Range
Extended focal length for greater flexibility.
Aperture
Fast aperture of F2 for better low-light performance.
Autofocus
Fast, quiet VXD linear motor for high-speed autofocus.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 24- | Tamron 35- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1319.00 | $1499.00 |
| Focal Length | 24-70mm | 35-150mm |
| Aperture | F2.8 | F2-2.8 |
| Weight | N/A | 41.1 oz |
| Autofocus | Standard | VXD Linear Motor |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II and Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD
When comparing the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II for Sony E and the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD for Sony E-Mount, it's essential to consider their specific features and intended use cases. The Sigma lens is priced at $1,319.00, while the Tamron lens comes in at $1,499.00, making the Sigma about 12% cheaper. Both lenses target photographers looking for high-quality optics with versatile focal lengths, but they offer different zoom ranges and advantages that cater to various photographic styles.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design and build quality, both lenses exhibit impressive craftsmanship, though they cater to different needs. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is known for its high sharpness throughout the image, making it a solid choice for general photography, including events and portraits. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 is designed to be a versatile travel lens that excels in both portrait and landscape photography. Weighing 41.1 oz and measuring 6.2 inches in length, the Tamron lens is bulkier compared to the Sigma, which might affect portability, especially for travel shooters.
Focal Length and Versatility
The focal length of a lens is crucial for determining its versatility in different shooting scenarios. The Sigma 24-70mm offers a standard zoom range, making it suitable for a variety of photography styles, from portraits to landscapes. In contrast, the Tamron 35-150mm extends into a longer range, making it particularly advantageous for portrait photographers who want to capture subjects from a distance without changing lenses. This additional range allows for greater flexibility in composition, especially in situations where moving closer to the subject may not be possible.
Aperture Performance
Both lenses feature impressive aperture ranges that enhance their performance in low-light conditions. The Sigma's constant F2.8 aperture provides consistent exposure throughout its zoom range, which is beneficial for maintaining depth of field and achieving beautiful bokeh. The Tamron lens, with its variable aperture of F2 to F2.8, offers a fast aperture that is particularly advantageous for portrait photography. This lens is touted as the world's first F2-2.8 fast aperture zoom lens, allowing for soft background bokeh and stunning low-light performance, making it ideal for twilight and nightscape photography.
Autofocus Technology
Autofocus performance is a critical factor for photographers. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II boasts high sharpness, which is complemented by its autofocus capabilities, although specific autofocus technology details are not highlighted. The Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8, however, features a fast, quiet VXD linear motor that ensures high-speed and high-precision autofocus. This technology is particularly beneficial for capturing dynamic subjects, providing an edge for photographers working in fast-paced environments or capturing moving subjects.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is a significant consideration when choosing a lens. The Sigma 24-70mm is recognized for its high sharpness throughout the entire image, which is essential for professional-quality photography. The Tamron 35-150mm also claims outstanding optical performance throughout its zoom range. Both lenses are designed to minimize optical aberrations, but the Tamron's unique capabilities, such as superior close-focusing ability with a minimum object distance of 13 inches at the wide end, provide additional creative opportunities for photographers looking to explore macro photography.
Intended Use Cases
Choosing between these two lenses often boils down to intended use cases. The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II is an excellent all-rounder, suitable for event photography, portraits, and landscapes. Its versatility makes it a go-to choice for many photographers. In contrast, the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 is tailored more towards portrait and travel photographers who need the flexibility to shoot at a distance while maintaining excellent image quality. Its longer focal length makes it particularly appealing for those who enjoy capturing subjects in a variety of settings without the need for frequent lens changes.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DGDN II and the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 depends on your specific needs as a photographer. The Sigma is about 12% cheaper and offers a solid focal range for general use, making it suitable for a wide array of photographic situations. Meanwhile, the Tamron offers a unique combination of a fast aperture and extended zoom range, making it ideal for portrait and travel photography. If versatility and a slightly lower price point are your priorities, the Sigma might be the better option. However, for those seeking specialized performance in portraiture and the flexibility of a longer focal length, the Tamron could be worth the investment.

