Cakrurt 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod for DJI vs EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod, Tripod for iPhone & Selfie
Updated July 2026 — Cakrurt 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod for DJI wins on max load, EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod, Tripod for iPhone & Selfie wins on height and extension.
The EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod offers better value for smartphone users, while the Osmo Action tripod excels for action camera enthusiasts.
Why Cakrurt 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod for DJI is better
Price
Osmo Action is more affordable for action camera users.
Build
Sturdier materials for action-oriented use.
Compatibility
Designed specifically for action cameras.
Why EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod, Tripod for iPhone & Selfie is better
Price
EUCOS is cheaper and offers great features.
Versatility
Compatible with a wider range of devices.
Functionality
Includes wireless remote for hands-free operation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Cakrurt 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod for DJI | EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod, Tripod for iPhone & Selfie |
|---|---|---|
| Material | ABS/Aluminum | Nylon PA6/6 |
| Compatibility | Action Cameras | Smartphones |
| Remote | No | Yes |
| Stability | High | Very High |
| Design | 2-in-1 | Tripod Only |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod is priced at $29.97, while the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod comes in at $19.99, making it about 17% cheaper than its competitor. Both products cater to different user needs, with the Cakrurt model designed primarily for action cameras and the EUCOS tripod targeting smartphone users. This article will delve into their features, usability, and overall value to help you determine which tripod suits your requirements best.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod boasts a robust build made from high-quality ABS and aluminum alloy, weighing just 0.66 lb (300 g). This tripod is compact, folding down to 11.6 inches, making it easy to carry. On the other hand, the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod utilizes modified Nylon PA6/6, ensuring all-weather durability while maintaining a lightweight frame of 13 oz. The premium materials of both tripods promise longevity, but the Osmo Action's aluminum alloy may provide a sturdier feel for action-oriented users.
Compatibility and Versatility
The 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod is specifically designed for use with various action cameras, including the DJI Osmo Action series and GoPro models. It features a 2-in-1 design, allowing it to function as both a hand grip and a standing tripod. The EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod, however, is built for smartphone compatibility, accommodating devices between 2.2" to 3.6" wide. With a focus on versatility, the EUCOS tripod also includes a cold shoe for additional accessories like lights and microphones, making it a better option for video production setups.
Usability and Functionality
The functionality of both tripods is impressive, but they cater to different scenarios. The 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod's extendable rod can reach lengths of up to 53.5 inches, allowing for dynamic group shots and unique angles. It also features a built-in tripod for stable fixed-point shooting. In contrast, the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod can rapidly extend to 62 inches, enabling instant elevation for filming. Its wireless remote allows for hands-free operation from up to 33 feet, making it ideal for solo users who want to capture themselves without assistance.
Stability and Performance
Stability is crucial when capturing photos or videos, and both tripods perform admirably in this regard. The Osmo Action tripod incorporates non-slip silicone pads to enhance stability, while its lightweight design ensures it remains portable. Meanwhile, the EUCOS tripod promises rock-solid stability, specifically designed to prevent blur during photography or videography. The solid build quality and user-friendly features of both tripods contribute to excellent performance, but the EUCOS model may have an edge for smartphone users due to its advanced clamping system.
Portability and Convenience
When it comes to portability, the 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod stands out with its compact folding design. At just 11.6 inches when collapsed, it fits easily into a backpack, making it a great companion for outdoor adventures. Conversely, the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod weighs slightly more but still remains manageable at 13 oz. Both tripods provide convenience, but the Osmo Action tripod’s compact size and lightweight design make it particularly appealing for on-the-go users.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two tripods is significant. The 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod is priced at $29.97, while the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod is available for $19.99. This makes the EUCOS tripod about 33% cheaper than the Cakrurt model, which may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. However, the additional features and capabilities of each tripod may justify their respective price points depending on the user’s needs.
Customer Reception
Both tripods have gained popularity among users, reflected in their sales ranks. The 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod holds a sales rank of 15,948, while the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod ranks significantly higher at 40. This suggests that the EUCOS model has resonated more with consumers, likely due to its affordability and versatility for smartphone users. Positive customer reviews also highlight the reliability and performance of both products, but the EUCOS tripod's features may appeal more to the average consumer.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the 53.5" Osmo Action Selfie Stick Tripod and the EUCOS 62" Phone Tripod depends largely on your intended use. If you are an action camera enthusiast seeking a reliable, extendable option for travel vlogs or sports, the Osmo Action tripod offers considerable advantages in terms of compatibility and stability. However, if you primarily use a smartphone for photography or video and desire a cost-effective, versatile solution, the EUCOS tripod is an excellent choice, especially considering its lower price point and additional functionality.

