vsversusfinder

Sigma 70- vs Canon 344B006 EF 24-

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 70- wins on price and autofocus, Canon 344B006 EF 24- wins on versatility and warranty.

The Sigma lens excels in autofocus speed and weather resistance, while the Canon lens offers versatility and affordability.

Why Sigma 70- is better

Autofocus

Sigma has a high-response Linear Actuator for faster focusing.

Weather Resistance

Sigma features a dust and splash-resistant structure.

Aperture

Sigma has a wider maximum aperture of f/2.8.

Why Canon 344B006 EF 24- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $509.

Versatility

Canon offers a broader focal range of 24-105mm.

Popularity

Canon has a notable sales rank of 1703.

Overall score

Sigma 70-
85
Canon 344B006 EF 24-
70

Specifications

SpecSigma 70-Canon 344B006 EF 24-
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4.0
Focal Length70-200mm24-105mm
Autofocus TypeHLAUSM
Weather SealingYesNo
Filter Size82mm77mm

Dimension comparison

Sigma 70-Canon 344B006 EF 24-

Overview of the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony

The Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony is a high-performance lens tailored for Sony E-mount and L-Mount cameras. Priced at $1,649.00, it features a high-response Linear Actuator (HLA) autofocus motor, ensuring swift and accurate focusing, making it ideal for dynamic photography. This lens is also built with a dust and splash-resistant structure, providing superior weather resistance that is characteristic of the SIGMA Sports line. It rounds out the F2.8 DG DN full-frame mirrorless trio, making it a versatile choice for professional photographers.

Overview of the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens

The Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens is a more budget-friendly option priced at $509.00. Although it has a slower maximum aperture of f/4.0 compared to Sigma's f/2.8, it features an image-stabilized ultrasonic motor (USM) that ensures silent and reliable operation. This lens allows for focusing as close as 45 cm, making it versatile for a variety of subjects. Additionally, it comes with a one-year manufacturer's warranty, providing peace of mind for buyers looking for a reliable lens.

Autofocus Performance

The Sigma lens is equipped with a high-response Linear Actuator (HLA) autofocus motor, which is designed to provide fast and accurate focusing, especially beneficial for capturing moving subjects. This can significantly enhance the shooting experience for action photographers. In contrast, the Canon lens utilizes an ultrasonic motor (USM) for autofocus, which is known for its quiet operation. While both lenses offer effective autofocus, the Sigma may have an edge in speed, particularly in demanding shooting scenarios.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

When it comes to build quality, the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS boasts a dust and splash-resistant structure, which makes it a reliable choice for outdoor photography in varying conditions. Its superior weather resistance aligns with the needs of professional photographers who often shoot in unpredictable environments. The Canon lens, while well-built, does not highlight the same level of weather sealing, which could be a consideration for those who shoot in inclement weather.

Focal Range Versatility

The Sigma 70-200mm lens provides a focal range of 70-200mm, which is particularly advantageous for portrait and sports photography, allowing for excellent subject isolation and background blur. On the other hand, the Canon 24-105mm lens offers a broader focal range from 24mm to 105mm, making it more versatile for landscape, portrait, and general photography. This means that while the Sigma is excellent for specific scenarios, the Canon lens allows for more flexibility in various shooting situations.

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the Sigma lens is significantly more expensive at $1,649.00, while the Canon lens is priced at $509.00. This makes the Canon lens approximately 69% cheaper than the Sigma, which can be a critical factor for photographers on a budget. The price difference opens up the possibility for photographers to invest in other gear or accessories when opting for the Canon lens, making it a more economical choice for many.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The Canon 344B006 lens has a sales rank of 1703, indicating it has a notable presence in the market and is a popular choice among users. Although no sales rank is provided for the Sigma lens, its higher price point may limit its appeal to a broader audience. The popularity of the Canon lens might suggest greater user satisfaction and reliability, making it a safer investment for those unsure about the more premium Sigma lens.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS and the Canon 344B006 EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L is USM Lens largely depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you require rapid autofocus, superior weather sealing, and are focused on portrait or sports photography, the Sigma lens may be worth the investment. However, if you need a versatile lens that is more budget-friendly and still offers great performance, the Canon lens is an excellent choice. Ultimately, consider your shooting style and the environments in which you’ll be photographing to make the best decision for your gear collection.