Sigma 70- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Sigma 70- wins on aperture and weight, Canon RF 24- wins on price and stabilization.
The Sigma lens excels in professional performance and low-light capabilities, while the Canon lens offers versatility and portability at a lower price.
Why Sigma 70- is better
Aperture
Sigma has a constant F2.8 aperture for better low-light performance.
Build Quality
Sigma features a dust and splash-resistant structure.
Focal Range
Sigma's longer 70-200mm range is ideal for sports and portraits.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $476.95.
Weight
Canon's compact design enhances portability.
Image Stabilization
Canon includes built-in Optical Image Stabilization.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 70- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F2.8 | f/4-7.1 |
| Focal Length | 70-200mm | 24-105mm |
| Weight | 1.5kg | 0.7kg |
| Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Autofocus | HLA Motor | STM Motor |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
The Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony is a premium lens designed for professional photographers, while the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers versatility for everyday use. The price difference is significant, with the Sigma priced at $1,649.00 and the Canon at $476.95, making the Canon about 71% cheaper. This price variance reflects the target audience and intended uses of each lens.
Build Quality and Design
The Sigma 70-200mm lens boasts a robust build with a dust and splash-resistant structure, catering to photographers working in challenging environments. Its superior weather resistance aligns with Sigma's Sports line reputation. In contrast, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a compact and lightweight design, enhancing portability for casual photographers and travelers. The Canon’s design is optimized for convenience, making it easy to carry during extended shooting sessions.
Focal Range and Versatility
The Sigma lens offers a focal length range of 70-200mm, providing excellent capabilities for portrait and sports photography due to its longer reach. This makes it ideal for capturing distant subjects with fine detail. Meanwhile, the Canon lens covers a versatile range of 24-105mm, allowing for wide-angle to short-telephoto shots. This flexibility makes the Canon perfect for a variety of photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and street photography.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Sigma 70-200mm lens maintains a constant maximum aperture of F2.8, enabling superior performance in low-light conditions and allowing for beautiful background blur. This is crucial for portrait photography, where subject isolation is desired. Conversely, the Canon lens features a variable maximum aperture ranging from f/4 to f/7.1. While it may struggle in lower light compared to the Sigma, the Canon's image stabilization technology compensates for this by providing up to five stops of correction.
Autofocus Capabilities
The Sigma lens employs a high-response Linear Actuator (HLA) autofocus motor, ensuring fast and accurate focusing, which is essential for capturing fleeting moments. This is particularly beneficial for action and sports photography. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a Smooth STM stepping motor, delivering quiet and precise autofocus performance, making it well-suited for both photography and video recording. The ability to achieve natural focus transitions enhances its appeal for content creators.
Image Stabilization Features
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens includes built-in Optical Image Stabilization, which is a significant advantage for handheld shooting, especially in low-light environments. This feature helps to reduce camera shake and improves the sharpness of images and smoothness of video footage. While the Sigma lens does not explicitly mention image stabilization, its optical design and F2.8 aperture help mitigate some shake, making it suitable for various shooting conditions.
Target Audience and Use Cases
The Sigma 70-200mm lens is geared towards professional photographers who require high-quality optics and robust build for demanding environments. It's ideal for sports, wildlife, and event photography where performance is critical. On the other hand, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for hobbyists and casual photographers looking for a versatile tool for everyday use, travel, and family moments. Its lightweight design and broad focal range make it an accessible choice for those who want to capture a variety of scenes with one lens.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens largely depends on your photography needs and budget. If you prioritize professional-grade performance and low-light capabilities, the Sigma lens is worth the investment at $1,649.00. However, if you seek versatility, portability, and an excellent price point at $476.95, the Canon lens presents a compelling option. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific photography style and requirements.

