Sigma 70- vs Canon RF100-
Updated July 2026 — Sigma 70- wins on price and build, Canon RF100- wins on focal length and stabilization.
The Sigma 70-200mm offers superior performance and build quality, while the Canon RF100-400mm is a more affordable and versatile option.
Why Sigma 70- is better
Build Quality
Sigma has a dust and splash-resistant structure.
Low Light Performance
Sigma's larger aperture excels in low-light conditions.
Autofocus Speed
Sigma's HLA motor provides fast and accurate focusing.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $699.
Versatility
Canon offers a longer focal length range.
Weight
Canon is more compact and lightweight.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 70- | Canon RF100- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | F2.8 | F5.6-8 |
| Image Stabilization | OS | 5.5-6 stops |
| Max Focal Length | 200mm | 400mm |
| Min Focusing | 1.0m | 0.88m |
| Autofocus Type | HLA | Nano USM |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
The Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony is priced at $1,649.00 while the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is significantly cheaper at $699.00, making it about 58% less expensive. This stark price difference reflects the target audience and intended use for each lens. The Sigma is a high-performance lens designed for professional use, while the Canon lens is tailored for enthusiasts looking for a versatile and lightweight option.
Build Quality and Design
The Sigma 70-200mm lens features a dust and splash-resistant structure, which is essential for outdoor photography. This design is part of Sigma's Sports line, known for its superior weather resistance. In contrast, the Canon RF100-400mm lens is compact and lightweight, appealing to those who prioritize portability. While both lenses are engineered for quality, the Sigma offers more durability against the elements, making it suitable for more demanding shooting conditions.
Focal Length and Versatility
When it comes to focal length, the Sigma 70-200mm lens offers a range of 70-200mm, which is ideal for portraits and sports photography. On the other hand, the Canon RF100-400mm lens extends from 100mm to 400mm, providing a much greater reach. This makes the Canon lens particularly versatile for wildlife and sports photography, where distance can be a factor. The Canon lens also supports RF tele extenders, effectively increasing its focal length to 560mm and 800mm, further enhancing its versatility.
Autofocus Performance
The Sigma lens is equipped with a high-response Linear Actuator (HLA) autofocus motor, which is designed for fast and accurate focusing. This feature is crucial for capturing fast-moving subjects in sports and wildlife photography. Conversely, the Canon RF100-400mm lens boasts Canon’s Nano USM technology, which offers smooth, quiet, and speedy autofocus. For photographers who often shoot in quiet environments, the Canon lens may have an edge due to its less intrusive autofocus operation.
Image Stabilization
Both lenses come with image stabilization features, but they differ in implementation. The Sigma 70-200mm lens includes Optical Stabilization (OS), which helps reduce camera shake, particularly useful in low-light conditions. The Canon RF100-400mm lens features an Optical Image Stabilizer that offers up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, increasing to 6 stops when paired with EOS R series cameras with In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS). This gives Canon users an advantage when shooting handheld at longer focal lengths, as the stabilization is effectively enhanced.
Target Audience
The Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 lens is primarily aimed at professional photographers who require superior performance and image quality. Its higher price point reflects this professional focus. In contrast, the Canon RF100-400mm lens is designed for a broader audience, including casual photographers and enthusiasts. Its lower price makes it accessible to those who want a quality telephoto lens without the premium cost associated with professional-grade equipment.
Image Quality
In terms of image quality, both lenses are designed to deliver impressive results. The Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 lens is known for its sharpness and contrast, especially at its maximum aperture. This is particularly beneficial for portraiture and low-light situations. Meanwhile, the Canon RF100-400mm lens utilizes an Ultra Low Dispersion lens element to correct chromatic aberration throughout the zoom range, ensuring crisp and colorful images. Both lenses excel in producing high-quality images, but the Sigma may have a slight edge in low-light performance due to its larger aperture.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS for Sony and the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM largely depends on your photography needs and budget. If you are a professional looking for a robust, high-performance lens that excels in low light and challenging conditions, the Sigma is worth its higher price of $1,649.00. However, if you are an enthusiast seeking a versatile, lightweight lens for wildlife and sports photography at a much lower price of $699.00, the Canon is an excellent choice. Ultimately, your decision should align with your specific requirements and shooting style.

