vsversusfinder

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk vs Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W

Updated August 2026 — NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk wins on price value and compatibility, Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W wins on modularity and power output.

The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is a more powerful and versatile option, while the NATNO model is budget-friendly for specific HP systems.

Why NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk is better

Price

The NATNO model is significantly cheaper.

Compatibility

Designed specifically for HP systems.

Basic Use

Sufficient for low-power tasks.

Why Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W is better

Power Output

500W output for high-performance needs.

Modular Design

Fully modular for better cable management.

Cooling System

Includes a dedicated cooling fan.

Overall score

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk
60
Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W
85

Specifications

SpecNATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDeskApevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W
ModularityNon-modularFully modular
PFCN/AActive PFC
ProtectionNoneMultiple protections
Cooling FanNone40mm fan
CompatibilityHP onlyUniversal

Dimension comparison

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDeskApevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W

Overview

The two power supplies being compared are the 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk Mini and the Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX Power Supply. The former is priced at $16.99, while the latter comes in at $49.99, making the HP-compatible model about 66% cheaper. Each power supply is targeted at different user needs, with the NATNO model designed specifically for certain HP desktop models, whereas the Apevia unit offers more generalized compatibility with various systems.

Compatibility

Compatibility is a major differentiator between these two power supplies. The 90W 65W Power Supply is tailored for specific HP models, including the ProDesk and EliteDesk series, as well as the HP Omni All-in-One models. This makes it an excellent choice for users with those specific systems, ensuring they have a reliable power source. In contrast, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is a more flexible option that supports a wide range of configurations, including Mini ITX and Flex ATX systems. Its versatility allows it to adapt to various builds, making it suitable for custom gaming setups or small form factor desktops.

Power Output

When it comes to power output, the differences are stark. The 90W 65W Power Supply delivers a maximum output of 90W, which is sufficient for basic computing tasks and low-power systems. In comparison, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W offers a robust 500W output, catering to high-performance needs such as gaming and server applications. This substantial difference means that users looking for a power supply for demanding components will find the Apevia option far superior for their requirements.

Modular Design

The Apevia ITX-PFC500W features a fully modular design, allowing users to connect only the cables they need. This not only helps in reducing clutter within the case but also improves airflow and cooling, which is crucial for high-performance systems. On the other hand, the 90W 65W Power Supply does not mention a modular setup, suggesting that it comes with fixed cables. For users who prioritize neatness and airflow, the Apevia model has a clear advantage.

Efficiency and Protection Features

Efficiency and protection features are vital for ensuring the longevity and reliability of power supplies. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W includes full range Active PFC and a variety of protection mechanisms such as Overvoltage Protection, Overload Protection, and Short Circuit Protection. These features are essential for safeguarding both the power supply and connected components. The 90W 65W Power Supply does not list similar protective features, which may raise concerns for users who prioritize safety in their computer builds.

Cooling System

Effective cooling is crucial for maintaining optimal performance in any power supply. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is equipped with a 40mm double ball bearing fan, which ensures efficient heat dissipation, especially under heavy loads. In contrast, the 90W 65W Power Supply lacks information regarding its cooling system, which could potentially lead to overheating if used in demanding environments. The presence of a dedicated cooling feature in the Apevia model makes it a preferable choice for high-performance applications.

Size and Form Factor

Size and form factor can greatly influence a user's choice of power supply, especially in compact builds. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is designed for Mini ITX and Flex ATX setups, making it a suitable choice for small form-factor PCs. Its dimensions (160mm x 73.66mm x 35.5mm) are compact enough to fit into most tight spaces. The 90W 65W Power Supply is primarily targeted at HP mini desktops, but specific size details are not provided. Users looking for a power supply that fits into cramped conditions may find the Apevia model more accommodating.

Price Comparison

The pricing difference between these two power supplies is significant. The 90W 65W Power Supply is priced at $16.99, while the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is available for $49.99. This makes the Apevia option approximately 194% more expensive than the NATNO model. While the lower price of the 90W 65W Power Supply may appeal to budget-conscious users, it is essential to consider the performance and features that come with the higher price tag of the Apevia model.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the 90W 65W Power Supply and the Apevia ITX-PFC500W ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you have a compatible HP system and require a basic power supply for everyday tasks, the 90W 65W Power Supply is an economical choice. However, if you're building a high-performance PC or require a flexible, robust, and feature-rich power supply, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is the better investment despite its higher price. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize compatibility and cost or power and versatility.