vsversusfinder

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk vs CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply

Updated August 2026 — NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk wins on output and price, CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply wins on cable length and build quality.

The CanaKit power supply is more affordable and specifically designed for Raspberry Pi 4, making it the better choice for that device. However, the NATNO power supply is versatile for multiple HP models.

Why NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk is better

Versatility

Compatible with multiple HP models.

Power Output

Higher wattage output for HP devices.

Brand Trust

Established brand for HP products.

Why CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply is better

Price

More affordable at $9.99.

Cable Length

5-foot cable for better accessibility.

Stability

Includes noise filter for stable operation.

Overall score

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDesk
75
CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply
85

Specifications

SpecNATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDeskCanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply
Power TypeAC AdapterUSB-C
Input Voltage100-240VN/A
Output Current4.74A3.5A
Noise FilterNoYes
UL ListedNoYes

Dimension comparison

NATNO 90W 65W Power Supply Compatible with HP ProDeskCanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply

Price Comparison

When comparing the prices of the 90W 65W Power Supply and the CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply, the CanaKit is significantly more affordable at $9.99, making it about 41% cheaper than the NATNO power supply, which is priced at $16.99. This substantial price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for a reliable power supply for their devices. While both products serve different purposes, the cost advantage of the CanaKit makes it an attractive option for Raspberry Pi users.

Compatibility

In terms of compatibility, the 90W 65W Power Supply offers extensive support for various HP ProDesk, EliteDesk, Omni, and Slimline models, making it a versatile choice for users with multiple HP devices. It is specifically designed for several HP ProDesk models, such as the G1 through G6, and is also compatible with HP EliteDesk 800 models. On the other hand, the CanaKit power supply is exclusively designed for the Raspberry Pi 4. For users with HP devices, the NATNO power supply is the clear choice, while Raspberry Pi 4 owners will find the CanaKit is perfectly tailored for their needs.

Power Output

The 90W 65W Power Supply provides a robust output of 90W at 19V and 4.74A, which also supports a lower 65W output at 19.5V and 3.33A. This versatility allows it to power a range of HP devices effectively. In contrast, the CanaKit power supply delivers a maximum output of 3.5A through a USB-C connection, specifically intended for the Raspberry Pi 4. While the NATNO power supply offers higher wattage and is suitable for a broader range of devices, the CanaKit's output is specifically optimized for the Raspberry Pi, ensuring it meets the power requirements needed for stable operation.

Build Quality

When it comes to build quality, both power supplies are designed with user safety and reliability in mind. The CanaKit power supply features a UL Listed designation, which signifies its compliance with established safety standards. Additionally, it incorporates a noise filter to enhance power stability, making it a trustworthy option for Raspberry Pi 4 users. The NATNO power supply does not explicitly mention certification standards, but it is built to support multiple HP models, suggesting a focus on durability and performance. Users may prefer the enhanced safety assurances of the CanaKit, especially for long-term use with sensitive electronics.

Cable Length

The CanaKit power supply comes with a generous 5-foot cable length, providing flexibility in placement and ease of access for users setting up their Raspberry Pi 4. This length can be particularly beneficial in scenarios where the power source is located further away from the device. In contrast, the NATNO power supply does not specify its cable length, which might be a drawback for users who prioritize convenience in setup. The extended cable of the CanaKit makes it a more user-friendly option for those looking to minimize clutter or maximize accessibility in their workspace.

Stability and Performance

Stability and performance are critical when choosing a power supply, and the CanaKit excels in this area with its built-in noise filter designed to provide high power stability. This feature helps to ensure that the Raspberry Pi 4 operates smoothly without unexpected interruptions. The NATNO power supply, while powerful, does not provide specific details regarding stability features. For users focusing on performance and reliability, especially when running demanding applications on the Raspberry Pi, the CanaKit's design may offer a superior experience.

Brand Reputation

Both NATNO and CanaKit have established themselves in the power supply market, but they cater to different audiences. CanaKit is well-known for its dedication to Raspberry Pi accessories and has garnered a reputation for quality and reliability among hobbyists and developers. On the other hand, NATNO provides power supplies for a variety of HP devices, making it a trusted choice in the business sector. Depending on the user's primary device needs, brand reputation might sway them toward either product, but CanaKit’s focused expertise in Raspberry Pi products could be a decisive factor for Raspberry Pi users.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the decision between the 90W 65W Power Supply and the CanaKit 3.5A Raspberry Pi 4 Power Supply ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a versatile power supply for various HP ProDesk and EliteDesk models, the NATNO power supply is your best bet. However, for those looking specifically for a reliable, cost-effective solution for the Raspberry Pi 4, the CanaKit is the clear winner, offering a lower price, better stability features, and a longer cable length.