Acer Aspire 3 15.6" Full HD IPS Laptop, AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, vs ASUS Vivobook Go 15.6” FHD Slim Laptop, AMD Ryzen
Updated August 2026 — Acer Aspire 3 15.6" Full HD IPS Laptop, AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, wins on storage and performance, ASUS Vivobook Go 15.6” FHD Slim Laptop, AMD Ryzen wins on weight.
The Acer Aspire 3 offers superior performance and features compared to the ASUS Vivobook Go, making it the better choice for demanding users.
Why Acer Aspire 3 15.6" Full HD IPS Laptop, AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, is better
Performance
Acer Aspire 3 has a more powerful processor and more RAM.
Storage
Acer Aspire 3 offers 1TB SSD compared to 128GB in ASUS Vivobook Go.
Battery Life
Acer Aspire 3 provides up to 11 hours of battery life.
Why ASUS Vivobook Go 15.6” FHD Slim Laptop, AMD Ryzen is better
Price
ASUS Vivobook Go is significantly cheaper.
Weight
ASUS Vivobook Go is lighter at 3.59 lbs.
Design
ASUS Vivobook Go has military-grade durability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Acer Aspire 3 15.6" Full HD IPS Laptop, AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, | ASUS Vivobook Go 15.6” FHD Slim Laptop, AMD Ryzen |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 7520U | AMD Ryzen 3 7320U |
| RAM | 16GB LPDDR5 | 8GB DDR5 |
| Storage | 1TB NVMe SSD | 128GB SSD |
| Display | 15.6" FHD IPS | 15.6" FHD NANOEDGE |
| Battery Life | Up to 11 hours | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Acer Aspire 3 is priced at $499.99, while the ASUS Vivobook Go is significantly cheaper at $315.99, making it about 37% less expensive. This price difference can play a crucial role for budget-conscious consumers or students looking to save money. While both laptops offer unique features, the lower price of the ASUS Vivobook Go makes it an attractive option for those who need basic functionality without breaking the bank. However, the Acer Aspire 3's higher price reflects its more powerful specifications, which may justify the investment for users needing enhanced performance.
Performance and Processing Power
In terms of processing power, the Acer Aspire 3 is equipped with an AMD Ryzen 5 7520U processor, which offers superior performance compared to the ASUS Vivobook Go’s AMD Ryzen 3 7320U processor. The Ryzen 5 is designed for better multitasking and can handle more demanding applications with ease. The Aspire 3's 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM also provides a noticeable edge in speed and efficiency, allowing users to run multiple applications simultaneously without lag. On the other hand, the Vivobook Go’s 8GB RAM is adequate for basic tasks, but may struggle with more intensive workloads.
Display Quality
The Acer Aspire 3 features a 15.6-inch Full HD IPS display, providing vibrant colors and wide viewing angles, ideal for streaming and productivity tasks. In contrast, the ASUS Vivobook Go also sports a 15.6-inch display, but with a NANOEDGE design that offers a slim bezel. While both displays are Full HD, the Aspire 3's anti-glare technology helps reduce eye strain during extended use, making it more suitable for long study sessions or movie marathons. The Vivobook Go’s brightness reaches 250 nits, which is decent but not as impressive as the Aspire 3's overall display quality.
Storage Options
When it comes to storage, the Acer Aspire 3 offers a substantial 1TB NVMe SSD, allowing users to store large files, media, and applications without concern for running out of space. This feature is particularly beneficial for students and professionals who handle extensive data. In comparison, the ASUS Vivobook Go comes with 128GB of SSD storage, which is significantly less. While it is sufficient for basic documents and some media, users might find themselves needing additional external storage sooner rather than later. The Aspire 3’s larger storage capacity is a significant advantage for those who require ample space for their work.
Connectivity Features
The Acer Aspire 3 is equipped with Wi-Fi 6 capabilities, offering faster and more reliable connectivity for streaming, video calls, and online work. The ASUS Vivobook Go, however, supports Wi-Fi 5, which is adequate but not as advanced as Wi-Fi 6. Additionally, the Aspire 3 includes a USB Type-C port, enhancing its versatility for modern peripherals and fast charging. The Vivobook Go does feature a good array of ports, including USB Type-C, but lacks some of the advanced connectivity options found in the Aspire 3. This makes the Acer a more future-proof choice for tech-savvy users.
Build Quality and Design
Both laptops are designed for portability, but the ASUS Vivobook Go is slightly lighter at 3.59 lbs compared to the Acer Aspire 3, which weighs 3.92 lbs. The Vivobook Go boasts a slim profile and a military-grade durability, which may appeal to users who need a resilient device for on-the-go use. In contrast, the Aspire 3, while still lightweight, is built with a sleek Silver chassis that lends a professional appearance. The choice between them may depend on personal preference for aesthetics and the importance of durability versus overall design.
Battery Life
The Acer Aspire 3 offers impressive battery life of up to 11 hours, making it suitable for extended use without the need to recharge frequently. This feature is particularly advantageous for students or professionals who spend long hours away from a power source. Conversely, the ASUS Vivobook Go does not specify its battery life, but given its lower specifications, it may not match the endurance of the Aspire 3. For users who prioritize long-lasting battery performance, the Acer Aspire 3 clearly stands out.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Acer Aspire 3 and the ASUS Vivobook Go boils down to individual needs and budget. If you require a powerful laptop with superior processing capabilities, extensive storage, and excellent battery life, the Acer Aspire 3 is worth the investment at $499.99. However, if your needs are more basic, and you are looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly option for everyday tasks, the ASUS Vivobook Go at $315.99 provides solid performance at a significantly lower price. Consider your usage scenarios to make the best choice for your circumstances.

