vsversusfinder

AKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII, vs Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone

Updated August 2026 — AKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII, leads on weight and length.

The AKG D 112 is a more cost-effective option for bass instruments, while the Electro-Voice RE320 offers greater versatility for various recording scenarios.

Why AKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII, is better

Price

AKG D 112 is $259.00, cheaper than RE320.

Bass Focus

Optimized for capturing bass instruments.

SPL Handling

Handles extremely high SPL without distortion.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

Can handle a range of instruments and vocals.

EQ Switch

Two-position EQ switch for tailored sound.

Durability

Integrated humbucking coil minimizes noise.

Overall score

AKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII,
75
Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
82

Specifications

SpecAKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII,Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
TypeDynamicDynamic
Frequency Response20 Hz - 20 kHz20 Hz - 18 kHz
SPL Handling160 dB150 dB
Cardioid PatternYesYes
EQ SwitchNoYes

Dimension comparison

AKG D 112 incl. SA60 stand adapter D112 MKII,Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone

Overview of the AKG D 112 and Electro-Voice RE320

The AKG D 112 is priced at $259.00, while the Electro-Voice RE320 costs $315.00, making the AKG about 17% cheaper. Both microphones cater to specific audio needs, primarily focusing on bass instruments and vocal applications, but they offer distinct features that may influence your purchasing decision.

Design and Build Quality

The AKG D 112 features a robust design tailored for miking bass instruments, with a large diaphragm that enhances its performance in studio and live settings. It also comes with a SA60 stand adapter, ensuring versatility in positioning. In contrast, the Electro-Voice RE320 is built with a durable structure that supports its use in various environments, particularly for recording music. Its integrated humbucking coil is designed to minimize hum and buzz, which makes it particularly effective in broadcast settings. Both microphones are built for durability, but the AKG is specifically engineered for bass applications, while the Electro-Voice excels in versatility.

Sound Quality and Performance

The sound quality of the AKG D 112 is characterized by its ability to handle extremely high sound pressure levels (SPL), making it a classic choice for stage and studio applications. Its frequency response extends down to 20 Hz, ensuring that deep bass sounds are captured accurately. On the other hand, the Electro-Voice RE320 is designed with a unique two-position frequency response switch that allows users to choose between a flat response and a tailored kick drum EQ. This feature provides flexibility for different recording situations, making it ideal for vocals, horns, guitar amps, and drums. The RE320's focus on a punchy sound for kick drums makes it a strong contender for those who prioritize versatility in their microphone choice.

Intended Use and Versatility

The AKG D 112 is primarily intended for bass instruments. Its design and features are optimized for capturing the nuances of low-frequency sounds, which makes it a favorite among bass players and sound engineers. The Electro-Voice RE320, however, is marketed as a dynamic cardioid broadcast microphone, suitable for a wider range of applications. Its ability to switch EQ settings makes it adaptable for different instruments and vocal recordings. This versatility allows the RE320 to shine in various recording scenarios beyond just bass, appealing to a broader audience.

Pricing Considerations

The AKG D 112 is currently priced at $259.00, while the Electro-Voice RE320 is available for $315.00. This price difference of $56 indicates that the AKG is a more cost-effective option, especially for those specifically looking for a microphone to capture bass sounds. Meanwhile, the higher price of the Electro-Voice may be justified by its additional features, such as the two-position EQ switch, which adds value for users needing versatility in their recordings.

Sales Performance and Reputation

Both microphones have their unique positions in the market, with the AKG D 112 holding a sales rank of 60,726 and the Electro-Voice RE320 at 76,619. While both products are popular, the higher sales rank of the AKG suggests it may be more favored among users specifically seeking a mic for bass instruments. This popularity can be attributed to its reliability and established reputation in studio and live settings, further enhancing its appeal to musicians and sound professionals alike.

User Experience and Feedback

Users of the AKG D 112 often praise its performance in live settings, noting its ability to handle high SPL without distortion. Its classic design and effectiveness for bass instruments have garnered a loyal following. Conversely, the Electro-Voice RE320 is lauded for its versatility and sound quality across various applications, particularly in broadcast settings. Users appreciate the dual personality of the microphone, allowing them to switch EQ settings depending on the instrument or vocal type being recorded. Both microphones have received positive feedback, but they cater to different user needs.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the AKG D 112 and the Electro-Voice RE320 ultimately depends on your specific audio needs. If you are primarily focused on capturing bass instruments and are looking for a cost-effective solution, the AKG D 112, priced at $259.00, is an excellent choice. However, if you require a versatile microphone capable of handling a range of recording scenarios, including vocals and instruments, the Electro-Voice RE320, at $315.00, may be worth the higher investment. Both microphones excel in their intended applications, ensuring quality performance for their users.