vsversusfinder

ATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men: vs Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men,

Updated August 2026 — ATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men: leads on battery and build.

The All-Metal Close Shave offers superior battery life and build quality, while the Remington F4 excels in brand reputation and versatility.

Why ATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men: is better

Battery Life

150 minutes vs 50 minutes

Build Quality

All-metal vs plastic

Versatility

2-in-1 grooming vs standard shaver

Why Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men, is better

Brand Reputation

More established brand

Wet/Dry Use

Showerproof design

Price

Only $0.01 more

Overall score

ATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men:
85
Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men,
75

Specifications

SpecATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men:Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men,
RPM10,000N/A
Runtime150 min50 min
ChargingUSB-CUSB
WeightLightweightStandard
TrimmerYesYes

Dimension comparison

ATVOXIS All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men:Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men,

Overview of the Products

In this comparison, we will examine the All-Metal Close Shave 3-Speed Foil Shaver for Men and the Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver for Men to help you decide which electric shaver best suits your needs. Both products are priced closely, with the All-Metal Close Shave priced at $39.95 and the Remington F4 at $39.96. While the prices are nearly identical, the distinctions in features and performance may influence your purchasing decision.

Design and Build Quality

The All-Metal Close Shave is crafted from a solid all-metal body, emphasizing durability and professional-grade performance. This design not only provides a premium feel but also ensures longevity. In contrast, the Remington F4 utilizes a standard plastic body with graphite-coated foils. While the graphite foils contribute to a smooth shave, they may not match the robustness of the all-metal construction of the All-Metal Close Shave. Overall, if build quality and a premium feel are priorities for you, the All-Metal Close Shave stands out.

Shaving Performance

When it comes to shaving performance, the All-Metal Close Shave features a powerful motor capable of reaching 10,000 RPM, offering three customizable speed settings (6,500/7,000/7,500 RPM). This allows for an ultra-close, comfortable shave, particularly for sensitive skin. The Remington F4 utilizes a 3-stage cutting system with flexing blades designed to adapt to the contours of your face, providing a close shave. While the Remington boasts effective performance, the higher RPM of the All-Metal Close Shave may give it an edge in efficiency and closeness.

Battery Life and Charging

The All-Metal Close Shave offers an impressive battery life, providing up to 150 minutes of shaving time from a single charge. This is significantly advantageous for users who travel frequently or prefer a shaver that requires less frequent charging. Additionally, it features a fast USB-C charging option. The Remington F4, on the other hand, provides up to 50 minutes of cordless runtime after a full 5-hour charge. In this category, the All-Metal Close Shave clearly outperforms, offering about three times the operational time per charge.

Versatility and Features

Versatility is another strong suit of the All-Metal Close Shave, which includes a 2-in-1 design that allows for both shaving and nose/ear hair trimming. It is engineered for quiet operation, making it suitable for daily use without causing disturbance. The Remington F4 excels in its own right with features like a pop-up trimmer for detailing and a wet/dry shaving capability, making it convenient for various shaving preferences. However, the dual functionality of the All-Metal Close Shave may appeal more to those looking for an all-in-one grooming solution.

Ease of Use

Both shavers are designed with user-friendliness in mind. The All-Metal Close Shave is lightweight and comes with a premium travel case, making it easy to carry during trips. Its design ensures a comfortable grip, allowing for easy maneuverability. The Remington F4 also features a non-slip grip and a showerproof design, enabling users to shave in wet conditions if preferred. While both products offer ease of use, the travel case of the All-Metal Close Shave adds an element of convenience for those on the go.

Price Comparison

Both the All-Metal Close Shave and Remington F4 are similarly priced, with the former at $39.95 and the latter at $39.96, making them almost interchangeable in terms of cost. However, considering the additional features and superior battery life offered by the All-Metal Close Shave, it provides better overall value for just a penny less. This price difference is negligible, but the enhanced performance and durability of the All-Metal Close Shave justify its pricing, giving it an edge in this aspect.

Customer Reception

The All-Metal Close Shave has a sales rank of 72,957, indicating a competitive presence in the market. Meanwhile, the Remington F4 holds a better sales rank of 54,674, suggesting it may be a more popular choice among consumers. This variance in popularity can reflect customer satisfaction and brand loyalty, possibly indicating that users may favor the Remington for its established reputation, despite the All-Metal Close Shave offering notable advantages in performance.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the All-Metal Close Shave and the Remington F4 Style Series Foil Shaver largely depends on your specific grooming needs and preferences. If you prioritize build quality, battery life, and the versatility of a 2-in-1 product, the All-Metal Close Shave is the superior option. Conversely, if you prefer a well-established brand with a strong sales reputation and additional features like wet/dry shaving, the Remington F4 may suit you better. Both shavers are excellent choices, but the All-Metal Close Shave edges out in functionality and durability.