vsversusfinder

Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,Mini vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star

Updated July 2026 — Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,Mini leads on height and weight.

The Antarctic Star offers significantly more storage and features, making it the better choice for those needing extra capacity. However, the Midea is a budget-friendly option for limited use.

Why Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,Mini is better

Storage Capacity

4.4 cu.ft vs 1.6 cu.ft

Cooling Range

Wider temperature range of 32°F to 50°F

Features

Two removable glass shelves for flexibility

Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better

Price

$122.99 vs $279.99

Energy Efficiency

Energy Star certified

Noise Level

Slightly quieter at less than 42 decibels

Overall score

Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,Mini
85
Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
65

Specifications

SpecAntarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,MiniMidea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Cooling Range32°F - 50°F28.4°F - 35.6°F
Shelves2 Glass1 Glass
Energy UseN/A207 kWh/year
Price$279.99$122.99
Sales Rank388105958

Dimension comparison

Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator,MiniMidea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star

Design and Size

When it comes to design and size, the Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator offers significantly more storage capacity than the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge. The Antarctic Star measures 20.28" W x 22.05" D x 31.5" H, providing a spacious 4.4 cu.ft capacity, which is ideal for storing a variety of snacks, beverages, and more. In contrast, the Midea measures 18.6" W x 17.7" D x 19.4" H, with a smaller 1.6 cu.ft capacity. This makes the Antarctic Star about 175% larger in volume, making it a better choice for those needing extra space.

Cooling Efficiency

The Antarctic Star features an adjustable temperature range of 32°F to 50°F with a 7-speed thermostat, catering to diverse cooling needs. On the other hand, the Midea offers a more limited cooling range from 28.4°F to 35.6°F, which is still effective but may not meet all users' preferences. Both models run quietly, with the Antarctic Star operating at less than 43 decibels and the Midea at less than 42 decibels, ensuring minimal noise disruption in your living or working environment.

Usability and Features

In terms of usability, the Antarctic Star provides two removable glass shelves that allow for easy cleaning and the flexibility to store items of varying sizes. Conversely, the Midea has one removable glass shelf and offers a convenient 2L bottle rack, making it an excellent option for daily use. The adjustable thermostats in both models simplify temperature regulation, but the Antarctic Star's enhanced features may appeal more to users with a broader range of storage needs.

Energy Efficiency

Energy efficiency is a crucial factor in choosing a refrigerator, and both models stand out in this category. The Midea is Energy Star certified, consuming only 207 kWh/year, which indicates its commitment to energy conservation. While the Antarctic Star does not specify its energy consumption, the Midea's certification suggests it is designed to be both energy-efficient and cost-effective for long-term use. The Midea's lower price of $122.99, about 56% less than the Antarctic Star's price of $279.99, also reflects its more budget-friendly approach.

Noise Level

Both refrigerators are engineered for quiet operation, making them suitable for bedrooms, offices, and dorms. The Antarctic Star operates at less than 43 decibels, while the Midea runs at a slightly quieter level of less than 42 decibels. This minimal noise level ensures that users can enjoy a peaceful environment, whether they are working, studying, or relaxing. While the difference in noise levels is marginal, it positions the Midea as a slightly more appealing option for those prioritizing silence in their living space.

Storage Capacity

Storage capacity is a major differentiator between these two models. The Antarctic Star's 4.4 cu.ft capacity allows users to store a wide variety of items, including larger food containers and multiple beverages, making it ideal for families or individuals who entertain often. The Midea, with its 1.6 cu.ft capacity, is more suited for limited use, such as keeping drinks and snacks immediately accessible in a small living space. This stark contrast means that the Antarctic Star caters more to users requiring significant storage, while the Midea is perfect for those with minimal refrigeration needs.

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge is considerably less expensive at $122.99 compared to the Antarctic Star's price of $279.99. This represents a difference of about $157, making the Midea approximately 56% cheaper. For budget-conscious consumers or those seeking a simple, effective cooling solution without the need for extensive storage, the Midea presents a compelling option. However, for those requiring greater capacity and features, the Antarctic Star's higher price may be justified.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Antarctic Star 4.4 Cu.Ft Compact Refrigerator and the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require ample storage space and versatile cooling options, the Antarctic Star is the clear winner with its larger capacity and additional features. However, if you're looking for a more economical solution and have limited space, the Midea is a fantastic choice, offering solid performance at a significantly lower price. Consider your storage needs, budget, and intended use to make the best decision for your situation.