vsversusfinder

Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini vs Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer

Updated July 2026 — Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini wins on capacity, Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer wins on weight and height.

The Sweetcrispy fridge offers more storage and features, making it the better choice for those needing capacity. However, the Antarctic Star is a great budget option for personal use.

Why Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini is better

Price

Antarctic Star is significantly cheaper at $35.09.

Noise Level

Antarctic Star operates at a quieter 25 dB.

Portability

Antarctic Star is designed for easy transport.

Why Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer is better

Storage Capacity

Sweetcrispy has a total capacity of 3.2 Cu.Ft.

Cooling Control

Sweetcrispy features an adjustable thermostat.

Interior Organization

Sweetcrispy includes multiple shelves and compartments.

Overall score

Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini
65
Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer
85

Specifications

SpecAntarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable MiniSweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer
Cooling TypeThermoelectricCompressor
Power SupplyAC/DCAC
Energy UseNot Specified0.41 kWh/day
Noise Level25 dB38 dB
Adjustable ShelvesYesYes

Dimension comparison

Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable MiniSweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer

Design and Size Comparison

When it comes to design and size, the Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini Fridge is significantly smaller than the Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge. The Antarctic Star, with its compact design, measures just 9.65"D x 7.09"W x 10.24"H, making it ideal for personal use in small spaces like dorms or cars. In contrast, the Sweetcrispy fridge is larger, with dimensions of 17.5"W x 17.7"D x 31.5"H, providing a more spacious interior for storing snacks and beverages. While the Antarctic Star can hold up to 6 cans, the Sweetcrispy offers a total capacity of 3.2 Cu.Ft, including a dedicated freezer area. This makes the Sweetcrispy a better choice for those needing more storage without sacrificing too much space.

Cooling Efficiency

In terms of cooling efficiency, the Sweetcrispy fridge stands out with its adjustable thermostat and energy-efficient design. It operates quietly and uses only about 0.41 kWh per day, translating to a cost of approximately $0.04 per day, which is economical for consistent cooling. On the other hand, the Antarctic Star uses thermoelectric technology to maintain a temperature that is 32ºF-40ºF below ambient temperature within 1-2 hours. While both fridges offer efficient cooling, the Sweetcrispy provides more control over temperature settings, making it suitable for various types of food and beverages.

Power Supply Options

The Antarctic Star offers versatile power supply options, allowing users to connect it to a 120V home power supply or a 12V car power supply. This flexibility makes it particularly appealing for those who travel frequently or need a fridge for both home and vehicle use. Conversely, the Sweetcrispy fridge operates on a standard home power supply, which may limit its portability. If you prioritize versatility and the ability to use the fridge on the go, the Antarctic Star is the superior choice.

Noise Level

When considering noise levels, the Antarctic Star operates at a remarkably quiet 25 dB, making it an excellent option for bedrooms or quiet workspaces. The Sweetcrispy, while also designed for quiet operation, has a slightly higher noise level at 38 dB. This difference may be significant for users who are particularly sensitive to sound during sleep or study. If a low-noise environment is a priority for you, the Antarctic Star is the clear winner.

Energy Efficiency

The Sweetcrispy fridge is designed with energy efficiency in mind, boasting minimal power consumption of 0.41 kWh per day. This not only helps keep your electricity bills low but also emphasizes eco-friendliness. The Antarctic Star, while energy-efficient through its semiconductor refrigeration chip, does not provide specific power consumption figures. However, the Sweetcrispy's defined energy usage suggests it is the more energy-conscious option, particularly for long-term use.

Storage Features

In terms of storage features, the Sweetcrispy fridge shines with its spacious interior that includes a crisper drawer, two adjustable shelves, and door compartments for easy organization. This allows for efficient storage of various items, ensuring that you can find what you need quickly. The Antarctic Star, on the other hand, has a removable shelf but is limited to a capacity of 4L. For users who need a more organized and flexible storage solution, the Sweetcrispy's design is more advantageous.

Price Comparison

The Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini Fridge is priced at $35.09, making it about 74% cheaper than the Sweetcrispy fridge, which is priced at $134.84. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious consumers or those seeking a simple, portable fridge for personal use. However, while the Antarctic Star is more affordable, the Sweetcrispy offers a broader range of features and higher storage capacity, which may justify the higher price for some buyers.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Antarctic Star 4L/6 Can Portable Mini Fridge and the Sweetcrispy 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini Fridge ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a compact, highly portable fridge primarily for personal use, the Antarctic Star is an excellent choice, especially given its lower price and quiet operation. However, if you require more storage space, adjustable temperature control, and better organization, the Sweetcrispy fridge is worth the investment. Each product has its strengths, making your choice contingent on whether you prioritize portability or capacity and features.