Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator, 3.2 vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Updated July 2026 — Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator, 3.2 leads on height and weight.
The Antarctic Star offers more space and features, while the Midea is more energy-efficient and budget-friendly.
Why Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator, 3.2 is better
Capacity
3.2 cu.ft vs 1.6 cu.ft
Features
Includes separate freezer compartment
Storage Flexibility
Removable glass shelves for customization
Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better
Price
$122.99 vs $189.99
Energy Efficiency
Energy Star certified
Noise Level
Operates at less than 42dB
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator, 3.2 | Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $189.99 | $122.99 |
| Sales Rank | 41425 | 5958 |
| Energy Use | N/A | 207 kWh/year |
| Noise Level | N/A | Less than 42dB |
| Freezer | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Size and Capacity
When it comes to size and capacity, the Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator offers a significantly larger storage space compared to the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge. The Antarctic Star has a capacity of 3.2 cu.ft, making it suitable for storing up to 120 standard 330ml beverage cans. In contrast, the Midea Mini Fridge has a smaller capacity of 1.6 cu.ft, which limits its storage options. This difference means that if you need more space for beverages, fruits, or frozen foods, the Antarctic Star is the better choice.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both refrigerators boast a sleek black exterior that can complement various home decors. The Antarctic Star features a double-door design with a separate freezer compartment, while the Midea has a single door with a more compact footprint. The Antarctic Star's design allows for easy access to both fresh and frozen items, making it ideal for those who appreciate organization in their storage. On the other hand, the Midea's smaller size makes it an excellent option for tight spaces, such as dorm rooms or small offices.
Functionality and Features
The Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator provides a range of features that enhance its functionality. It includes adjustable and removable glass shelves, allowing users to customize their storage based on their needs. The temperature control range is versatile, with settings from 32°F to 50°F for the refrigerator and -1°F to 3°F for the freezer. Meanwhile, the Midea WHS-65LB1 offers an adjustable thermostat with a temperature range of 28.4°F to 35.6°F. While both models have adjustable shelves, the Antarctic Star's dual compartments provide greater flexibility for storing different food types.
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is a significant consideration when choosing a refrigerator. The Midea WHS-65LB1 is Energy Star certified, consuming only 207 kWh per year. This makes it a more energy-efficient option, potentially leading to lower electricity bills over time. The Antarctic Star does not specify its energy consumption, which may raise questions about its efficiency. If energy savings are a priority for you, the Midea is the more responsible choice.
Noise Level
The noise level of a refrigerator can impact your comfort, especially in quieter living spaces. The Midea WHS-65LB1 operates at a noise level of less than 42dB, ensuring a quiet environment that won't disturb your daily activities. The Antarctic Star does not provide specific noise level information, making it difficult to compare directly. For those who prioritize peace and quiet, the Midea's low noise operation may make it the preferable option.
Price Comparison
Price is always a crucial factor in deciding between two products. The Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator is priced at $189.99, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is more affordable at $122.99. This price difference of about 35% makes the Midea a more budget-friendly option for consumers looking for a mini fridge. However, the Antarctic Star's higher price may be justified by its larger capacity and additional features, making it essential to weigh your specific needs against the cost.
Sales Rank and Popularity
When considering popularity, the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge ranks significantly higher on sales charts, with a bestseller rank of 5,958 compared to the Antarctic Star's rank of 41,425. This indicates that more consumers are choosing the Midea model, possibly due to its compact design and energy efficiency. For buyers looking for a well-reviewed and popular option, the Midea may be the safer bet.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Antarctic Star Mini Compact Refrigerator and the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a larger capacity and more versatile storage options, the Antarctic Star is the better choice despite its higher price. Conversely, if energy efficiency, compact size, and a lower price are your priorities, the Midea stands out as a strong contender. Consider your space, storage requirements, and budget carefully to make the best decision for your situation.

