vsversusfinder

Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W vs ASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold

Updated August 2026 — ASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold leads on fan size and length.

The ASRock PRO-650G offers superior power output and efficiency, making it the better choice for most users. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is suitable for compact builds with lower power needs.

Why Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W is better

Compact Size

Ideal for small form factor builds

Price

Currently priced the same as ASRock

Modularity

Fully modular design for easier cable management

Why ASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold is better

Power Output

650W vs 500W for better performance

Efficiency

80 PLUS Gold certified for lower energy costs

Cooling

Quieter 120mm fan for better thermal management

Overall score

Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W
65
ASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold
85

Specifications

SpecApevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500WASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold
Wattage500W650W
EfficiencyN/A80 PLUS Gold
Cooling Fan40mm120mm
ProtectionBasicComprehensive
WarrantyN/A3 Years

Dimension comparison

Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500WASRock PRO-650G Power Supply - 650W 80 Plus Gold

Price Comparison

Both the Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX Power Supply and the ASRock PRO-650G Power Supply are priced at $49.99, making them equally accessible options. When looking for a power supply, price can often be a deciding factor, and these two models are positioned similarly in the market. It’s important to note, however, that the average price over the past 90 days for the ASRock PRO-650G is approximately $50.12, which suggests that it has maintained a consistent price point. In contrast, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W has a higher average price of $59.99, indicating that while it is currently listed at the same price, it may have more fluctuations in pricing.

Power Output

The power output is a significant differentiator between the two models. The ASRock PRO-650G delivers a robust 650W of power, which is ideal for mid-range gaming and productivity systems that may require more headroom for components like high-performance graphics cards. On the other hand, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W provides a maximum power of 500W, which is sufficient for smaller systems or those with lower power requirements. This difference in wattage could make a substantial impact on performance, particularly for users who intend to run more demanding applications or gaming setups.

Efficiency Ratings

When it comes to efficiency, the ASRock PRO-650G stands out with its 80 PLUS Gold certification, which ensures that it operates at up to 90% energy efficiency. This level of certification not only reduces power consumption and heat output but also enhances cost-effectiveness over time. In comparison, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W does not specify an efficiency rating, which could be a drawback for users concerned about energy costs and environmental impact. The ASRock model’s superior efficiency could lead to lower electricity bills and a reduced carbon footprint.

Form Factor and Compatibility

The form factors of these power supplies cater to different user needs. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is designed as a Mini ITX/Flex ATX power supply, making it well-suited for small form factor builds, such as compact gaming rigs or POS systems. Its dimensions are compact, allowing for flexible installation in tight spaces. In contrast, the ASRock PRO-650G follows the standard ATX form factor, measuring 140x150x86mm, ensuring compatibility with most full-sized cases. This design allows for easier integration into larger systems, appealing to users who may wish to upgrade their builds in the future.

Cooling Solutions

Cooling is crucial for maintaining system stability and performance. The ASRock PRO-650G features a quiet 120mm fan that balances effective cooling with low noise levels, providing a more comfortable gaming or working environment. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W, however, utilizes a smaller 40mm double ball bearing fan, which may not provide the same level of cooling efficiency, especially under heavy loads. Users who anticipate high-performance tasks may prefer the superior cooling capabilities of the ASRock model to ensure stable operation during demanding sessions.

Protection Features

Both power supplies offer a range of protection features, but the ASRock PRO-650G provides a more comprehensive set. It includes over-current, over-voltage, under-voltage, over-power, over-temperature, and short-circuit protections, ensuring a high level of safety for connected components. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W also offers multiple protections, including overvoltage and short-circuit protection, but lacks some of the additional safeguards found in the ASRock model. This might be a consideration for users who prioritize system safety and reliability.

Build Quality and Components

In terms of build quality, the ASRock PRO-650G uses all-Taiwanese capacitors, known for their durability and longevity, which can enhance the lifespan of the power supply. This focus on quality components may provide users with increased confidence in their investment. Conversely, the build quality of the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is not detailed in the provided specifications, which may leave some potential buyers questioning its longevity. A power supply is a critical component, and investing in a model with superior build quality can lead to better long-term reliability.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Apevia ITX-PFC500W and the ASRock PRO-650G ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a power supply for a compact build and a lower wattage system, the Apevia model is a solid choice due to its compact form factor and lower price point. However, for users looking for a more powerful, efficient, and reliable power supply that meets modern standards, the ASRock PRO-650G emerges as the better option. With its higher power output, 80 PLUS Gold efficiency rating, and comprehensive protection features, it offers significant advantages for those who demand performance and safety in their systems.