Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W vs Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 Fully Modular Power
Updated August 2026 — Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 Fully Modular Power leads on cooling and noise.
The Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 offers superior power output and efficiency, making it the better choice for demanding setups.
Why Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W is better
Price
Apevia is significantly cheaper at $49.99.
Size
Apevia is designed for compact mini ITX systems.
Basic Needs
Apevia suits casual users with low power requirements.
Why Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 Fully Modular Power is better
Power Output
Cooler Master provides 850W compared to Apevia's 500W.
Efficiency
Cooler Master has an 80 Plus Gold certification.
Warranty
Cooler Master offers a 10-year warranty.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W | Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 Fully Modular Power |
|---|---|---|
| Max Power | 500W | 850W |
| Efficiency | Not Specified | 80 Plus Gold |
| Modularity | Fully Modular | Fully Modular |
| Warranty | Not Specified | 10 Years |
| Cooling Fan | 40mm | Hexagonal |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When it comes to power supplies, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W and the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 offer distinct features catering to different user needs. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is priced at $49.99, making it a budget-friendly option designed for mini ITX systems, while the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 is available for $89.99, targeting users seeking higher power capacity and efficiency. Understanding their specifications and features will help you decide which one is more appropriate for your setup.
Power Output Comparison
The Apevia ITX-PFC500W delivers a maximum power output of 500W, which is suitable for small form factor builds, particularly in compact gaming or POS systems. In contrast, the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 provides 850W, giving it a significant edge for users with more demanding setups, like high-performance gaming rigs or workstations requiring multiple GPUs. The Cooler Master’s power output is 70% higher than that of the Apevia, making it a better choice for those who plan on upgrading their systems in the future.
Efficiency Ratings
Efficiency plays a crucial role in power supply performance, and here the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 stands out with its 80 Plus Gold certification. This rating indicates that it maintains at least 90% efficiency under standard load conditions, ensuring minimal energy waste and lower electricity bills. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W does not specify an efficiency rating, but its full range active PFC feature suggests a level of efficiency, albeit likely lower than that of the Cooler Master. For users who prioritize energy efficiency, Cooler Master is the clear winner in this comparison.
Modular Design
Both power supplies boast a fully modular design, which enhances cable management and airflow within the case. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W includes a variety of connectors tailored for mini ITX setups, whereas the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 offers a more comprehensive selection of cables, including a 90° 12V-2x6 PCIe 5.1 connector, designed for improved electrical durability. This modularity not only makes installations cleaner but also allows users to only connect the cables they need, minimizing clutter. The versatility in cabling offered by the Cooler Master is particularly beneficial for more complex builds.
Cooling Solutions
Cooling is a critical aspect of power supply performance, and both units implement forced air ventilation. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W utilizes a 40mm double ball bearing fan, which is effective for its size but may not provide the same airflow as larger, more advanced cooling solutions. In contrast, the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 features an advanced thermal performance design with a hexagonal fan cover that enhances airflow intake by 80%. Additionally, it incorporates a zero-RPM mode for low noise operation when the load is light. For users concerned with thermal management and noise, the Cooler Master offers superior cooling capabilities.
Build Quality and Durability
Durability is essential for power supplies, and the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 is designed with longevity in mind. It comes with a 10-year warranty, reflecting the manufacturer's confidence in its build quality. The unit is crafted to handle high loads efficiently, and its ATX 3.1 support ensures it can handle modern hardware demands. On the other hand, while the Apevia ITX-PFC500W also includes several protections, such as overvoltage and short circuit protection, it does not specify a warranty period. For users prioritizing long-term reliability, the Cooler Master’s extended warranty gives it a significant advantage.
Target User Base
The target audience for these two power supplies differs considerably. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is aimed at budget-conscious consumers looking to build small form factor systems without the need for extensive power. Its low price of $49.99 makes it an attractive option for casual users or those who might be building their first PC. In contrast, the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3, priced at $89.99, is designed for enthusiasts and professionals who require higher power output and efficiency. It caters to users who demand reliability and performance, especially in high-end gaming or workstation environments.
Pricing Analysis
The price difference between the two products is substantial. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is priced at $49.99, while the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 is available for $89.99. This makes the Cooler Master about 80% more expensive than the Apevia, reflecting its higher power output and efficiency features. While the lower cost of the Apevia may appeal to those with basic needs, the investment in the Cooler Master could prove worthwhile for users needing more power and reliability over the long term.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Apevia ITX-PFC500W and the Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 V3 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are building a small form factor system and want to save money, the Apevia is a suitable and economical choice. However, for users seeking higher efficiency, greater power capacity, and superior build quality, the Cooler Master is worth the higher price. The decision boils down to whether you value the additional features and performance of the Cooler Master enough to justify its increased cost.

