Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W vs Thermaltake Smart BM3 750W 80Plus Bronze ATX 3.1 &
Updated August 2026 — Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W wins on modularity, Thermaltake Smart BM3 750W 80Plus Bronze ATX 3.1 & wins on warranty and cooling.
The Thermaltake Smart BM3 offers superior power output and efficiency, making it the better choice for high-performance builds. However, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is a more budget-friendly option.
Why Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W is better
Price
Apevia is $26 cheaper than Thermaltake.
Modularity
Apevia has a fully modular design.
Size
Apevia is smaller and fits in compact builds.
Why Thermaltake Smart BM3 750W 80Plus Bronze ATX 3.1 & is better
Power Output
Thermaltake provides 750W compared to 500W.
Efficiency
Thermaltake has an 80Plus Bronze certification.
Warranty
Thermaltake offers a 5-year warranty.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Apevia ITX-PFC500W Mini ITX/Flex ATX / 1U 500W | Thermaltake Smart BM3 750W 80Plus Bronze ATX 3.1 & |
|---|---|---|
| Modularity | Fully Modular | Semi-Modular |
| Efficiency | Not Specified | 80Plus Bronze |
| Cooling | 40mm Fan | 120mm Fan |
| Warranty | Not Specified | 5 Years |
| Connectors | 6 | 5 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Apevia ITX-PFC500W is priced at $49.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the Thermaltake Smart BM3, which costs $75.99. This significant price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. While both products offer quality power supply solutions, the lower price of the Apevia unit may attract those building a system on a tighter budget. However, it’s essential to consider what each power supply offers in terms of features and specifications relative to their cost.
Power Output
The Thermaltake Smart BM3 provides a maximum power output of 750W, significantly higher than the 500W offered by the Apevia ITX-PFC500W. This means that the Thermaltake unit can support more demanding components, such as high-end graphics cards and multiple drives. If you plan to build a gaming PC or a workstation with power-hungry components, the additional wattage of the Thermaltake may be crucial. Conversely, for less demanding builds, the 500W offered by the Apevia might be sufficient.
Modular Design
The Apevia ITX-PFC500W features a fully modular design, while the Thermaltake Smart BM3 is semi-modular. This means that with the Apevia, users can connect only the cables they need, which can lead to better airflow and a cleaner build. The Thermaltake, although semi-modular, requires some cables to be permanently attached, which can clutter the interior of the case. For builders who prioritize aesthetics and cable management, the fully modular design of the Apevia may be more appealing.
Efficiency Ratings
In terms of efficiency, the Thermaltake Smart BM3 holds an 80Plus Bronze certification, indicating it operates between 82% to 85% efficiency at typical loads. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W does not specify an efficiency rating, which raises questions about its performance in this area. Higher efficiency translates to lower energy costs and less heat generation, which can enhance the longevity of the components. Thus, for consumers concerned about energy efficiency, the Thermaltake is likely the better choice.
Cooling Solutions
The cooling systems of both power supplies differ in design. The Apevia ITX-PFC500W uses a 40mm double ball bearing fan for forced air ventilation, while the Thermaltake Smart BM3 employs a larger 120mm fluid dynamic bearing fan. The larger fan typically provides improved airflow and quieter operation, especially under load. Additionally, the Thermaltake includes a Smart Zero Fan function, which allows the fan to remain off until the load exceeds 20%, further minimizing noise. For users who value quiet operation, the Thermaltake's cooling system may be more effective.
Connector Options
When it comes to connector options, the Apevia ITX-PFC500W offers a variety of connections, including 1 x 20+4pin Main Power, 1 x 8pin 12V (P4+4), and 2 x 6+2 PCIe connectors, among others. In contrast, the Thermaltake Smart BM3 is equipped with 4 PCIe 6+2 pin connectors and a PCIe Gen 5 (12V-2x6) connector, making it more future-proof for modern graphics cards. If you’re planning to use multiple GPUs or the latest hardware, the Thermaltake's additional connectors provide greater flexibility.
Warranty and Longevity
The Thermaltake Smart BM3 comes with a 5-year warranty, indicating the manufacturer's confidence in its durability and reliability. In contrast, the warranty information for the Apevia ITX-PFC500W is not provided. A longer warranty can be an essential consideration for consumers looking for peace of mind, especially in high-performance builds where power supplies are under continuous load. The assurance of a 5-year warranty with the Thermaltake product may sway buyers towards it for long-term use.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Apevia ITX-PFC500W and the Thermaltake Smart BM3 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a cost-effective solution for a basic build and appreciate the benefits of a fully modular design, the Apevia might be the right choice for you at $49.99. However, if you're looking to build a more powerful system with high-end components, the Thermaltake's superior power output, efficiency rating, and additional features justify its higher price of $75.99. Consider your future upgrade paths and the importance of warranty and performance when making your decision.

