ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer vs Frigidaire EFMIS171 Retro Mini Portable Personal
Updated July 2026 — ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer leads on weight and height.
The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator offers superior capacity and cooling capabilities, making it the better choice for long-term use, while the Frigidaire excels in portability and affordability.
Why ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer is better
Larger Capacity
ARCTIC CHEF has 3.2 cubic feet vs Frigidaire's 4 liters.
Cooling Technology
ARCTIC CHEF uses compressor cooling for better temperature control.
Energy Efficiency
ARCTIC CHEF consumes only 5 kWh annually.
Why Frigidaire EFMIS171 Retro Mini Portable Personal is better
Price
Frigidaire is $32.99 compared to ARCTIC CHEF's $159.00.
Portability
Frigidaire weighs only 3 pounds and is easy to transport.
Compact Design
Frigidaire's dimensions are 10 x 7 x 10.5 inches.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer | Frigidaire EFMIS171 Retro Mini Portable Personal |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | Compressor | Thermoelectric |
| Thermostat | Adjustable | None |
| Freezer | Yes | No |
| Energy Use | 5 kWh/year | Low |
| Design | Modern | Retro |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When comparing the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator and the Frigidaire EFMIS171 Retro Mini Portable Personal Fridge, it's essential to note their distinct designs and functionalities. The ARCTIC CHEF model, priced at $159.00, offers a larger capacity and versatile cooling features, whereas the Frigidaire model is more compact and portable, retailing at $32.99. This price difference makes the Frigidaire about 79% cheaper than the ARCTIC CHEF, appealing to those with limited budgets or specific space constraints.
Design and Aesthetics
The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator features a sleek, modern design with a platinum stainless finish, making it an attractive addition to any room. Its dimensions allow it to fit comfortably in dorms or small offices. On the other hand, the Frigidaire EFMIS171 boasts a retro aesthetic that is both fun and functional. With a compact design measuring 10 x 7 x 10.5 inches, it is perfect for personal spaces and boasts versatility in placement. While the ARCTIC CHEF emphasizes a contemporary look, the Frigidaire appeals to those who appreciate a nostalgic style.
Capacity and Storage
The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator offers a total capacity of 3.2 cubic feet, making it significantly larger than the Frigidaire's 4-liter capacity, which is designed to chill six 12 oz. soda cans. This means the ARCTIC CHEF is more suitable for storing larger quantities of food and beverages, including a built-in freezer compartment for ice or frozen meals. In contrast, the Frigidaire is ideal for quick access to drinks and snacks, making it less versatile for extensive storage but perfect for personal use.
Cooling Technology
Both models employ different cooling technologies tailored to their intended uses. The ARCTIC CHEF utilizes compressor cooling, which is effective for maintaining a consistent temperature, even during hot weather. It features an adjustable thermostat, allowing users to customize the temperature to their liking. Meanwhile, the Frigidaire employs thermoelectric technology that cools up to 32°F below ambient temperature, making it more energy-efficient and eco-friendly. However, this method may not be as effective in extreme heat compared to the compressor system used by the ARCTIC CHEF.
Portability
The Frigidaire EFMIS171 excels in portability, weighing only 3 pounds and equipped with both AC and DC charging options. This makes it easy to transport, whether for a picnic, road trip, or simply moving it from room to room. The ARCTIC CHEF, while still manageable, is less portable due to its size and weight. Its design is intended for stationary use in dorms or offices, where it can provide ample storage without the need for frequent relocation.
Energy Efficiency
When considering energy consumption, the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator boasts an annual power consumption of just 5 kilowatt-hours, which is impressive for its size. This efficiency contributes to lower electricity bills, making it a financially sound choice for longer-term usage. The Frigidaire, with its thermoelectric system, is designed to be environmentally friendly, utilizing semiconductors free of CFCs and refrigerants. Both models offer energy-saving features, but the ARCTIC CHEF's compressor may provide better performance in varying conditions.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two models is substantial, with the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator priced at $159.00, while the Frigidaire EFMIS171 is available for just $32.99. This means that the Frigidaire is about 79% cheaper, making it a more accessible choice for consumers on a budget. However, the higher price of the ARCTIC CHEF reflects its larger capacity and advanced cooling capabilities, which may justify the investment for those needing a reliable fridge for extended use.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator and the Frigidaire EFMIS171 depends on individual needs and circumstances. If you require a larger, more versatile fridge with superior cooling capabilities for longer-term use, the ARCTIC CHEF is the better option. However, if portability and a budget-friendly price point are your primary concerns, the Frigidaire is an excellent choice for personal use in smaller spaces.

