ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Updated July 2026 — ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer leads on height and weight.
The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator offers more storage and superior cooling capabilities, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is a budget-friendly option with quieter operation.
Why ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer is better
Storage Capacity
3.2 cu ft vs 1.6 cu ft
Cooling Performance
Superior temperature control
Design
Sleek platinum stainless finish
Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better
Price
$122.99 vs $159.00
Noise Level
Less than 42 dB
Energy Efficiency
207 kWh/year
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator, Compact Freezer | Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Method | Compressor | Compressor |
| Adjustable Thermostat | Yes | Yes |
| Energy Star | No | Yes |
| Ice Cube Chamber | 0.3 cu ft | No |
| Annual Power | 5 kWh | 207 kWh |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator and Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge
When comparing the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator and the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, it's clear that both models cater to compact living spaces, but they differ significantly in features and price. The ARCTIC CHEF, priced at $159.00, offers a larger capacity of 3.2 cubic feet, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is priced at $122.99 and provides a smaller 1.6 cubic feet of space. This price difference means the Midea is about 23% cheaper than the ARCTIC CHEF, making it a potentially more budget-friendly option for those needing less storage.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator boasts a sleek platinum stainless finish that can enhance the decor of any room, whether it's a dorm, office, or kitchen. This model not only looks modern but is also designed with a reversible door, allowing flexibility in placement. On the other hand, the Midea WHS-65LB1 features a classic black finish that is equally versatile for various settings. The compact dimensions of the Midea (18.6 x 17.7 x 19.4 inches) make it ideal for tight spaces, but the ARCTIC CHEF’s larger size might be more suitable for those needing additional storage without compromising style.
Storage Capacity and Organization
The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator stands out with its 3.2 cubic feet of storage, making it significantly more spacious than the Midea WHS-65LB1, which has only 1.6 cubic feet. This additional space in the ARCTIC CHEF allows for better organization with multiple adjustable shelves and a dedicated ice cube chamber of 0.3 cubic feet. In contrast, the Midea offers a practical single glass shelf that can be removed for larger items, but it may restrict how much you can store at once. For users who prioritize storage flexibility, the ARCTIC CHEF provides a clear advantage.
Cooling Performance
Both refrigerators feature adjustable thermostat controls, but the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator offers a more versatile temperature range with its compressor cooling system, ensuring that food and beverages remain fresh even in warmer conditions. The Midea WHS-65LB1 can maintain temperatures between 28.4℉ to 35.6℉, which is adequate for most needs but may not reach the colder settings that the ARCTIC CHEF can achieve. Users looking for optimal cooling performance might prefer the ARCTIC CHEF for its superior temperature control.
Energy Efficiency
When it comes to energy consumption, both models are designed with efficiency in mind. The ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator has an annual power consumption of just 5 kilowatts, making it economical to run. The Midea WHS-65LB1 is also energy-efficient, rated at only 207 kWh per year, which is beneficial for those looking to minimize electricity costs. While both options are energy-saving, the ARCTIC CHEF’s lower power requirement could be a deciding factor for energy-conscious consumers.
Noise Level
The Midea WHS-65LB1 is noted for its ultra-quiet operation, with a noise level of less than 42 decibels. This makes it an excellent choice for noise-sensitive environments like bedrooms or shared living spaces. While the ARCTIC CHEF does not specify its noise level, it employs a compressor cooling system that can sometimes be noisier than thermoelectric options. If a quiet refrigerator is a top priority, the Midea WHS-65LB1 may have the upper hand.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two mini fridges is significant, with the Midea WHS-65LB1 being priced at $122.99, which is about 23% less than the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator at $159.00. For consumers on a tight budget or those who require less storage, the Midea offers a compelling value without sacrificing essential features. However, those who need additional capacity and advanced cooling options might find the price of the ARCTIC CHEF justifiable.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC CHEF Mini Refrigerator and the Midea WHS-65LB1 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require more storage space, superior cooling capabilities, and a stylish design, the ARCTIC CHEF is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly, compact refrigerator that operates quietly and efficiently, the Midea WHS-65LB1 is an excellent choice. Assessing your priorities will guide you toward the refrigerator that best suits your lifestyle.

