ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB - Single-Tower CPU Cooler vs ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop -
Updated August 2026 — ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB - Single-Tower CPU Cooler wins on installation eas, ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - wins on cooling performa and noise level.
The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB offers excellent aesthetics and value, while the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO excels in cooling performance and compatibility. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB - Single-Tower CPU Cooler is better
Price
Freezer 36 is significantly cheaper.
Aesthetics
Freezer 36 has customizable ARGB lighting.
Ease of Installation
Freezer 36 features a user-friendly click installation system.
Why ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - is better
Cooling Performance
FX240 PRO has superior liquid cooling capabilities.
Compatibility
FX240 PRO supports both Intel and AMD sockets.
Pump Efficiency
FX240 PRO's pump runs at a higher RPM for better heat dissipation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB - Single-Tower CPU Cooler | ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | Air | Liquid |
| Max RPM | 2000 | 2900 |
| Socket Support | Intel LGA1851/1700 | Intel & AMD |
| Fan Count | 2 | 2 |
| ARGB Lighting | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB is designed with a focus on aesthetics and functionality, featuring a sleek single-tower design complemented by digital ARGB lighting. In contrast, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO boasts an all-black layout that seamlessly integrates into modern builds, especially those with dark interiors. The Freezer 36 has 12 A-RGB LEDs positioned along the fan hub, providing vibrant illumination, while the FX240 PRO includes a unique CD pattern on its pump header, adding a premium touch. Both coolers cater to users who appreciate visual flair in their setups, but the Freezer 36 takes the lead in customizable lighting options.
Cooling Performance
The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB is engineered for high-performance cooling, capable of handling high-end CPUs with its four heat pipes and pressure-optimized 120 mm fans that operate at 2000 RPM. On the other hand, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is a liquid cooler with a powerful pump running at 2900 RPM, designed for a total dissipative power (TDP) of 300W. This means that while the Freezer 36 excels in air cooling, the FX240 PRO potentially offers superior cooling performance due to its liquid cooling technology, making it suitable for more demanding applications.
Installation Process
Installation ease is a notable factor for both coolers, but they approach it differently. The ARCTIC Freezer 36 uses an innovative click installation system that simplifies mounting and fan replacement. This design is particularly user-friendly, especially for those new to PC building. In contrast, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO utilizes a daisy chain connector for its fans, which streamlines cable management and reduces clutter. While both coolers aim to simplify the installation process, the Freezer 36’s straightforward mounting system may appeal more to novice builders.
Compatibility
Compatibility varies between the two products, with the ARCTIC Freezer 36 supporting Intel LGA1851 and LGA1700 sockets. It is designed to fit a broad range of setups with its single-tower configuration. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO, however, presents broader compatibility, supporting both Intel and AMD sockets including LGA1851/1700/1200/1151/1150/1155/1156 and AM4/AM5. This broader support makes the FX240 PRO a versatile option for users with different CPU brands, whereas the Freezer 36 might be limited to specific Intel setups.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are a crucial consideration for many users, especially in gaming or workstation environments. The ARCTIC Freezer 36 operates at a maximum of 2000 RPM, which can lead to noticeable noise under heavy load, although the fluid dynamic bearings help to minimize operational noise. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO, with its pump running at 2900 RPM, may also produce noise but is designed to maintain stable performance even under extreme conditions. For users concerned about noise, both coolers are likely to be comparable, but the Freezer 36’s design may offer quieter operation in less demanding scenarios.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant differentiator between the two coolers. The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB is priced at $35.80, making it about 35% cheaper than the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO, which retails at $54.99. This substantial price difference may influence budget-conscious consumers, especially those who do not require the extreme cooling performance offered by the liquid cooler. The lower price of the Freezer 36 makes it an attractive option for users building mid-range systems without compromising too much on cooling efficiency.
Target Audience
Each cooler is aimed at slightly different audiences based on their design and performance characteristics. The ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB is targeted towards gamers and PC builders who prioritize aesthetics and efficient air cooling for high-end CPUs. It is well-suited for systems that do not require extreme overclocking. Conversely, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is designed for those who need robust cooling solutions for gaming and high-performance computing, with a focus on liquid cooling systems that can handle more demanding setups. Understanding these target audiences can help consumers select the product that best fits their needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC Freezer 36 A-RGB and the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize aesthetic customization and a lower price point, the Freezer 36 is an excellent choice. However, if you require superior cooling performance and broader compatibility with both Intel and AMD sockets, the FX240 PRO is worth the investment despite its higher price. Each cooler brings distinct advantages to the table, making your decision largely dependent on your individual use case and budget considerations.

