ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - vs Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler,
Updated August 2026 — ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - leads on aesthetics and cooling perf.
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro excels in performance and aesthetics, while the Thermalright AXP90 X36 offers a budget-friendly, compact solution. Choose based on your cooling needs and budget.
Why ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - is better
Cooling Performance
ARCTIC cooler has a 240 mm radiator for better heat dissipation.
Design
ARCTIC features A-RGB lighting for enhanced aesthetics.
Noise Levels
ARCTIC operates quieter under load compared to Thermalright.
Why Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler, is better
Price
Thermalright is significantly cheaper at $20.39.
Compact Size
Thermalright's low profile is ideal for small builds.
Compatibility
Thermalright supports a wide range of Intel and AMD sockets.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - | Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler, |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | AIO | Air |
| Socket Support | LGA1700/AM5 | LGA1700/AM5 |
| Fan Type | PWM | PWM |
| RGB Lighting | Yes | No |
| Max RPM | 2000 | 1800 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB is a premium all-in-one CPU cooler, while the Thermalright AXP90 X36 is a low-profile alternative designed for compact builds. The ARCTIC model is priced at $80.00, whereas the Thermalright cooler is significantly less expensive at $20.39—making it about 74% cheaper. This stark price difference sets the stage for a deeper comparison, focusing on performance, design, and target use cases.
Cooling Performance
When it comes to cooling capabilities, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro boasts advanced features that cater to high-performance CPUs. With its 240 mm radiator and a dedicated VRM fan, it ensures optimal heat dissipation, especially under heavy loads. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP90 X36, while compact and efficient, is better suited for moderate cooling needs. Its 36mm height makes it an excellent choice for smaller cases, but it may not handle extreme thermal output as effectively as the ARCTIC model.
Design and Aesthetics
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro features a sleek design with A-RGB lighting that adds a visual flair to any build. This cooler is not just about performance; its aesthetics can enhance the overall look of a gaming setup. Conversely, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 has a more utilitarian appearance, prioritizing functionality over flashiness. While it is less visually striking, its compact form factor makes it a fitting choice for minimalist setups or ITX builds.
Installation and Compatibility
Installation ease is a crucial factor for many builders. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro includes native offset mounting for both Intel and AMD CPUs, ensuring that the cooler aligns perfectly for maximum efficiency. It supports various contact frames, including Intel LGA1851 and LGA1700, as well as AMD AM5/AM4. On the other hand, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 also offers good compatibility, supporting Intel LGA1150/1151/1200/1700 and AMD AM4/AM5. However, its lower height may limit airflow in certain builds, potentially affecting cooling efficiency.
Noise Levels
Noise output is another vital aspect when comparing CPU coolers. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is designed to operate quietly, with its P12 Pro fans delivering performance without excessive noise, even at higher speeds. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 has a maximum noise level of 22.4 DBA, which is relatively quiet but may still be noticeable in a silent environment. If noise is a top priority, the ARCTIC cooler may provide a more serene experience during intensive tasks.
Durability and Build Quality
Both coolers exhibit quality construction, but they cater to different user needs. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is built with a focus on longevity and durability, featuring optimized contact pressure distribution for improved heat dissipation and a dedicated VRM fan to enhance reliability. The Thermalright AXP90 X36, made with a nickel plating process for corrosion resistance, also emphasizes durability, though its lower profile design may limit its effectiveness in high-stress scenarios.
Price and Value Proposition
Price is a significant differentiator between these two products. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is available for $80.00, reflecting its advanced features and performance capabilities. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 offers a compelling value at $20.39, catering to budget-conscious consumers or those needing a simpler cooling solution. While the ARCTIC cooler may justify its price with superior cooling performance and aesthetics, the Thermalright cooler represents a solid choice for those who prioritize cost-effectiveness without sacrificing essential functionality.
Customer Reception
While specific sales and bestseller rankings for these products are not provided, the pricing and feature set suggest that the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro likely appeals to enthusiasts seeking high performance in demanding environments. The Thermalright AXP90 X36, with its lower price point, may attract a different demographic, such as first-time builders or those with space constraints. Each product has its own niche, which impacts customer reception and satisfaction.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro and the Thermalright AXP90 X36 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for high-performance cooling with advanced features and aesthetics, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is worth the investment at $80.00. However, if you require a compact, budget-friendly solution for a smaller build, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 at $20.39 might be the better option. Each cooler has its strengths, and the best choice will align with your individual requirements and preferences.

