ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - vs Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W
Updated August 2026 — ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - leads on noise level and build quality.
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro offers superior cooling performance and compatibility, making it the better choice for high-performance builds. The Thermaltake Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option for low-power CPUs.
Why ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - is better
Cooling Performance
ARCTIC cooler is designed for high-performance builds.
Compatibility
Supports both AMD and Intel sockets.
Advanced Features
Includes integrated VRM fan and PWM control.
Why Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W is better
Price
Gravity i3 is significantly cheaper.
Size
Low-profile design fits in compact cases.
Noise Level
Operates quietly at 21.3 decibels.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB - | Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W |
|---|---|---|
| Socket Compatibility | AMD AM5/AM4, Intel LGA 1700/1851 | Intel LGA 1700/1851 |
| Max Airflow | 62 CFM | 56.84 CFM |
| Noise Level | Quiet | 21.3 dB |
| Fan Speed | 2000 RPM | 1200-3500 RPM |
| Warranty | Not specified | 2 years |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 240 A-RGB features a robust design with a 240 mm radiator, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 has a compact low-profile design suitable for smaller setups. The ARCTIC cooler is built for higher performance with its integrated VRM fan and PWM-controlled operation, ensuring optimal cooling even under heavy loads. In contrast, the Gravity i3, measuring just 2.58 inches in height, is designed for low power processors, making it ideal for compact cases. Both coolers emphasize efficiency, but the ARCTIC’s larger size suggests it can handle more demanding tasks, while the Gravity i3 excels in space-constrained environments.
Cooling Performance
When it comes to cooling performance, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is engineered for high efficiency, especially with its P12 Pro fan that operates quietly while delivering superior airflow. The Gravity i3, with its 92 mm fan, provides satisfactory cooling for processors up to 95W. While the ARCTIC cooler boasts a higher maximum speed for optimal performance under load, the Gravity i3 maintains a low noise level at 21.3 decibels, which is a significant advantage for users prioritizing quiet operation. However, the ARCTIC's design indicates a better cooling solution for high-performance builds.
Compatibility
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is compatible with both AMD AM5/AM4 and Intel LGA 1700/1851 socket types, making it a versatile choice for various CPU builds. The Gravity i3, on the other hand, is specifically optimized for Intel LGA 1700 and 1851 sockets. This difference means that users with AMD processors will have to opt for the ARCTIC cooler, while those with Intel CPUs can choose between the two based on their performance needs. The wider compatibility of the ARCTIC cooler may give it an edge for users with mixed setups.
Installation Process
The installation process for both coolers is designed to be user-friendly, but they cater to different preferences. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro features integrated cable management, which reduces clutter by allowing only one visible cable to connect to the motherboard. In contrast, the Gravity i3 emphasizes quick and easy installation, which can be particularly appealing for users who may not be as experienced with building PCs. While both coolers are straightforward to install, the ARCTIC’s integrated features may appeal to those looking for a cleaner aesthetic.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are a crucial consideration for users who prefer a quieter computing environment. The Gravity i3 operates at a noise level of 21.3 decibels, making it a great option for those focused on minimal sound disturbance. In comparison, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro, while designed for performance, also manages to maintain a low noise profile, although specific decibel ratings are not provided. Users seeking a balance between performance and quiet operation may find the Gravity i3 more appealing due to its lower operating noise.
Price Consideration
The price difference between the two coolers is significant, with the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro priced at $80.00, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is priced at just $17.79. This makes the Gravity i3 about 78% cheaper than the ARCTIC cooler. However, the lower price comes with limitations in performance and compatibility, which may not suit power users. For budget-conscious consumers or those with less demanding cooling needs, the Gravity i3 presents a very affordable solution, whereas the ARCTIC cooler justifies its higher price with advanced features and better overall performance.
Warranty and Support
Both coolers come with warranties that reflect their manufacturers' confidence in their products. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro does not specify a warranty period in the provided data, while the Gravity i3 includes a 2-year warranty. This warranty period can offer peace of mind for users, especially those new to PC building. The longer-lasting and more reliable performance of the ARCTIC cooler may also justify its higher price, but for users who prefer a straightforward and budget-friendly option, the Gravity i3’s warranty is a solid offering.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro and the Thermaltake Gravity i3 comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for superior cooling performance, extensive compatibility, and advanced features, the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is the clear winner, despite its higher price. However, if you need a budget-friendly solution for low-power Intel CPUs, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 offers decent performance at a fraction of the cost. Your decision should align with your CPU requirements, case size, and noise preferences to ensure you choose the right cooler for your setup.

