ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 A-RGB - AIO CPU vs Scythe Fuma 3 CPU Air Cooler, Intel LGA1700,
Updated July 2026 — ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 A-RGB - AIO CPU wins on depth and weight, Scythe Fuma 3 CPU Air Cooler, Intel LGA1700, wins on height and noise level.
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro offers superior cooling performance and advanced features, while the Scythe Fuma 3 is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your cooling needs and budget.
Why ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 A-RGB - AIO CPU is better
Cooling Performance
ARCTIC provides better thermal performance under load.
Aesthetics
ARCTIC features customizable A-RGB lighting.
Compatibility
ARCTIC supports a wider range of CPU sockets.
Why Scythe Fuma 3 CPU Air Cooler, Intel LGA1700, is better
Price
Scythe is significantly cheaper.
Ease of Installation
Scythe has a user-friendly installation system.
Size
Scythe is more compact and fits in more cases.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 A-RGB - AIO CPU | Scythe Fuma 3 CPU Air Cooler, Intel LGA1700, |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | AIO | Air |
| Fan Count | 3 | 2 |
| Socket Support | LGA1851/1700 | LGA1700 |
| Max RPM | 2000 | 1500 |
| Warranty | 6 years | 3 years |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to CPU Coolers
Choosing the right CPU cooler is essential for maintaining optimal performance and longevity of your PC. In this comparison, we look at two popular models: the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 A-RGB AIO CPU Cooler and the Scythe Fuma 3 CPU Air Cooler. The ARCTIC cooler is priced at $94.99, while the Scythe model comes in significantly lower at $49.99, making it about 47% cheaper. Let’s dive into the key features, performance, and design of each cooler to help you make an informed decision.
Cooling Performance
The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is designed for high-performance cooling, featuring a 38 mm radiator and three 120 mm fans. It boasts enhanced heat dissipation capabilities, crucial for heavy workloads. In contrast, the Scythe Fuma 3 employs a dual tower design with a combination of 25 mm and 15 mm PWM fans that rotate in opposing directions for improved airflow and static pressure. Both coolers cater to high TDP processors, but the ARCTIC’s advanced AIO (All-In-One) design typically offers superior thermal performance, especially under load.
Installation Process
When it comes to installation, the Scythe Fuma 3 shines with its Premium HPMS V system, which simplifies the setup process for various Intel and AMD sockets, including LGA1700 and AM5. The ARCTIC cooler also features an optimized mounting system, ensuring effective contact pressure distribution for both Intel and AMD processors. While both coolers are designed for straightforward installation, the Fuma 3’s user-friendly design may appeal to those who prioritize ease of setup.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are a crucial factor for many users, especially in quiet environments. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro is equipped with the P12 PRO fan, noted for its quiet operation even at higher speeds. The integrated VRM fan further contributes to a quieter overall performance by cooling voltage regulators. On the other hand, the Scythe Fuma 3 utilizes Kaze Flex II fans designed for silent operation. With both coolers emphasizing quiet performance, users can expect minimal noise disruption, but the ARCTIC may have an edge in noise management under heavy loads.
Aesthetics and Build Quality
In terms of aesthetics, the ARCTIC cooler features a sleek black design with A-RGB lighting that adds a modern touch to any build. Its integrated cable management system helps reduce clutter. The Scythe Fuma 3, while less flashy, boasts a dual-tower structure with a premium aluminum fin array and a black top cover, giving it a classic and robust appearance. Both models are well-built, but the ARCTIC may be more appealing to users looking for customizable lighting options.
Compatibility
Compatibility is another essential consideration. The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro supports a wide range of Intel and AMD sockets, including the latest LGA1851 and AM5. This versatility makes it an excellent choice for future-proofing your build. The Scythe Fuma 3 also supports various Intel and AMD sockets, including LGA1700 and AM5, but its performance is particularly optimized for mainstream gaming rigs and workstations. Both options are suitable for modern processors, but the ARCTIC’s broader compatibility may have an advantage for users with different CPU choices.
Price Point
The price difference between the two coolers is significant, with the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro priced at $94.99 and the Scythe Fuma 3 at $49.99. This makes the Scythe cooler about 47% cheaper, which is a considerable factor for budget-conscious consumers. However, it’s essential to weigh the price against the performance and features offered by each cooler. Users willing to invest more may find that the ARCTIC cooler justifies its higher price with enhanced cooling capabilities and additional features.
User Feedback and Reputation
While specific sales ranks were not provided, both brands have established reputations in the cooling market. ARCTIC is known for its innovative designs and high-performance products, while Scythe has garnered respect for its cost-effective solutions without compromising quality. User reviews often highlight the efficiency and reliability of both coolers, but the ARCTIC model may receive more praise for its advanced cooling technology and build quality.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro and the Scythe Fuma 3 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize superior cooling performance, advanced features, and aesthetic appeal, the ARCTIC cooler is worth the investment at $94.99. However, if you are looking for a reliable and cost-effective solution for mainstream gaming and general use, the Scythe Fuma 3 at $49.99 provides excellent value. Consider your system requirements and personal preferences to make the best choice for your build.

