ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - Powerful Premium Fan, vs ID-COOLING IS-55 Black CPU Cooler Low Profile
Updated July 2026 — ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - Powerful Premium Fan, wins on depth and airflow, ID-COOLING IS-55 Black CPU Cooler Low Profile wins on height and noise level.
The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST offers superior performance and value, making it the better choice for most users.
Why ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - Powerful Premium Fan, is better
Price
ARCTIC is significantly cheaper at $9.49 compared to ID-COOLING's $39.99.
RPM Range
ARCTIC has a wider RPM range of 600-3000 RPM.
Noise Control
ARCTIC can stop completely at low PWM levels for silent operation.
Why ID-COOLING IS-55 Black CPU Cooler Low Profile is better
Design
ID-COOLING's low-profile design is ideal for compact builds.
Heat Pipes
ID-COOLING features 5 heat pipes for better heat dissipation.
RAM Compatibility
ID-COOLING allows for better RAM compatibility in small cases.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC P12 Pro PST - Powerful Premium Fan, | ID-COOLING IS-55 Black CPU Cooler Low Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Max RPM | 3000 | N/A |
| Bearing Type | Fluid Dynamic | N/A |
| PWM Control | Yes | Yes |
| Socket Compatibility | Universal | Intel/AMD |
| Price | $9.49 | $39.99 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST and ID-COOLING IS-55
The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST is priced at $9.49, while the ID-COOLING IS-55 is significantly more expensive at $39.99, making the ARCTIC about 76% cheaper. The ARCTIC fan focuses on high static pressure and innovative design for effective cooling, while the ID-COOLING cooler emphasizes a low-profile design with multiple heat pipes for thermal efficiency. This comparison will examine their key features, efficiency, and usability to help determine which product might be the better choice for your cooling needs.
Design and Build Quality
The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST features a sleek design with a 120 mm size and a black finish that suits various builds. Its fluid dynamic bearing is engineered for quiet operation and durability, helping to minimize noise while maximizing airflow. In contrast, the ID-COOLING IS-55 boasts an ultra-compact low-profile design with a total height of just 57 mm, making it ideal for smaller cases or builds where space is at a premium. Both products are well-constructed, but their designs cater to different needs: the ARCTIC for general use with high performance, and the ID-COOLING for compact systems.
Cooling Performance
Cooling performance is a crucial aspect, and the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST excels in this area with its ability to generate airflow from 600 to 3000 RPM, which enables it to adapt to various cooling demands. The fan's high static pressure is particularly beneficial in setups with dense configurations like radiators or mesh cases. The ID-COOLING IS-55, while also effective, is designed to deliver excellent heat dissipation through its 5 heat pipes and a 120 mm PWM fan. It provides a maximum airflow of 54.6 CFM and operates quietly with a noise level ranging from 13.8 to 31.2 dB(A). While both products provide solid cooling, the ARCTIC offers a broader RPM range, potentially leading to better performance under heavy loads.
Installation and Compatibility
The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST is straightforward to install, thanks to its universal 4-pin PWM connection, which makes it compatible with a wide variety of setups. It can easily fit in most cases, given its standard 120 mm size. The ID-COOLING IS-55, however, is specifically designed for compatibility with Intel LGA and AMD AM4/AM5 sockets, making it a great choice for those with compact builds. Its low-profile nature allows for excellent RAM compatibility even in Mini-ITX motherboards, which is a significant advantage for users with limited space. Overall, while both products are user-friendly, the ID-COOLING may be more suitable for users with specific motherboard requirements.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are critical for users seeking a quiet computing environment. The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST is engineered for quiet operation, with its fluid dynamic bearing significantly reducing vibrations. This design allows the fan to operate quietly, particularly at lower RPMs. The ID-COOLING IS-55 also prioritizes noise reduction, operating at a noise level range of 13.8 to 31.2 dB(A). While both fans are designed to be quiet, the ARCTIC's ability to stop completely at lower PWM levels (<5%) gives it an edge in silent operation during light loads, making it the better option for noise-sensitive users.
Price and Value
In terms of price, the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST is available for $9.49, which presents excellent value for users seeking an efficient cooling solution without breaking the bank. The ID-COOLING IS-55, priced at $39.99, is considerably more expensive, at over four times the price of the ARCTIC fan. While the ID-COOLING cooler offers advanced features suited for compact builds, the significant price difference may deter budget-conscious buyers. For users prioritizing cost-effectiveness, the ARCTIC clearly holds a substantial advantage.
User Ratings and Popularity
The ARCTIC P12 Pro PST has a sales rank of 12,134, indicating it is a popular choice among consumers. The lack of a specified sales rank for the ID-COOLING IS-55 makes it challenging to gauge its popularity directly. However, the relatively higher price point may limit its appeal. The ARCTIC's popularity suggests that many users find its performance and price compelling, making it a trusted choice in the CPU cooler market.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST and the ID-COOLING IS-55 largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for an affordable, high-performance fan that excels in efficiency and quiet operation, the ARCTIC P12 Pro PST is the clear winner at $9.49. However, if you need a low-profile cooler that fits into a compact build and offers excellent thermal management, the ID-COOLING IS-55 could be the right choice, albeit at a higher price of $39.99. Ultimately, both products have their strengths, but for most users, the ARCTIC's value and performance make it the more appealing option.

