ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse – 3 Pack – vs Thermalright AXP90-X53 White Low Profile ITX CPU Air Cooler,
Updated August 2026 — ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse – 3 Pack – wins on airflow and cooling, Thermalright AXP90-X53 White Low Profile ITX CPU Air Cooler, wins on compatibility.
The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse offers superior airflow and versatility, while the Thermalright AXP90-X53 excels in low-profile applications. Choose based on your specific cooling needs.
Why ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse – 3 Pack – is better
Higher RPM
ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse has a max speed of 3000 RPM.
Better airflow
High static pressure for dense setups.
Versatile design
Can be used in various builds.
Why Thermalright AXP90-X53 White Low Profile ITX CPU Air Cooler, is better
Low profile
Thermalright AXP90-X53 is only 53mm tall.
Silent operation
Rated at 22.4 dBA.
Specific compatibility
Designed for ITX motherboards.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse – 3 Pack – | Thermalright AXP90-X53 White Low Profile ITX CPU Air Cooler, |
|---|---|---|
| Max RPM | 3000 | 2700 |
| Noise Level | Low | 22.4 dBA |
| Air Pressure | High | 1.33 mmH2O |
| Bearing Type | FDB | Copper |
| Compatibility | Versatile | ITX |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse and the Thermalright AXP90-X53 are both designed for efficient cooling, but they cater to different needs. The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse, priced at $18.49, offers a unique reverse airflow design, while the Thermalright AXP90-X53, at $19.39, is a low-profile CPU air cooler. This comparison will explore their features and benefits to help you determine which is the better option for your cooling requirements.
Design and Aesthetics
The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse features a sleek black design that is ideal for glass-fronted PC cases, drawing air from the back side to maintain a clean appearance. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 sports a white finish, which is visually appealing and matches many modern builds. With a height of just 53mm, the AXP90-X53 is a low-profile cooler, making it suitable for compact cases. Although both products are designed with aesthetics in mind, the choice between them largely depends on your case style and personal preference.
Cooling Performance
In terms of cooling performance, the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse boasts a maximum speed of 3000 RPM, providing high static pressure that efficiently penetrates dense radiators and mesh structures. It is particularly effective in setups with resistance, ensuring reliable cooling. On the other hand, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 features a maximum fan speed of 2700 RPM, utilizing a pure copper base and four heat pipes for effective heat dissipation. While both coolers deliver solid performance, the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse offers a slightly higher RPM and static pressure, which may provide better cooling in high-demand scenarios.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are crucial when selecting a cooling solution. The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse is designed for quiet operation, thanks to its smooth-running fluid dynamic bearing, which minimizes noise during use. However, specific dBA levels are not provided. Conversely, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 has a rated noise level of 22.4 dBA, making it a silent option for those prioritizing a quiet environment. If you're particularly sensitive to noise, the AXP90-X53 may be the better choice, but the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse's design aims to keep noise levels low as well.
Compatibility
Compatibility is another important factor to consider. The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse is a fan that can be used in various setups, making it versatile for different builds. The Thermalright AXP90-X53, however, is specifically tailored for ITX motherboards and supports various CPU sockets, including Intel LGA1700 and AMD AM4/AM5. This level of compatibility makes the AXP90-X53 an excellent choice for compact systems, particularly those where space is at a premium, providing more options for users with specific motherboard types.
Installation Process
The installation process can significantly affect user experience. The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse is straightforward to install as a fan, fitting easily into most setups. On the other hand, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 includes a detailed manual and installation video to assist users in mounting it correctly. Its design, which requires specific mounting fasteners for different platforms, may take a bit more time to set up compared to the ARCTIC fan. For users who prefer a quick and easy installation, the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse may be more appealing.
Price Comparison
The ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse comes at a price of $18.49, making it about 5% cheaper than the Thermalright AXP90-X53 at $19.39. This small price difference might make the ARCTIC fan more attractive for budget-conscious buyers who still want quality cooling performance. However, the Thermalright cooler's design and features may justify the additional cost for users requiring low-profile solutions and specific compatibility with compact cases.
Customer Support and Warranty
Customer support and warranty can significantly impact a buyer's confidence in a product. While specific warranty details are not provided for either product, ARCTIC is known for its excellent customer service, which can be a crucial factor in case of issues. Thermalright also has a good reputation in the market, particularly for its cooling solutions. Buyers should consider the brand's support history when making their selection, as having reliable customer service can enhance the overall ownership experience.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse and the Thermalright AXP90-X53 depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize a versatile fan with higher RPM and static pressure for more demanding cooling situations, the ARCTIC P12 Pro Reverse is the better choice. However, if you're looking for a low-profile cooler specifically designed for compact builds with silent operation, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 is worth the extra cost. Your decision should ultimately reflect your system's requirements and your personal preferences regarding aesthetics and noise levels.

