vsversusfinder

ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™ vs MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support

Updated August 2026 — MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support leads on performance and expansion.

The ASRock A520M-HDV is a budget-friendly option for AMD users, while the MACHINIST X99 offers superior memory support and expansion for Intel users.

Why ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™ is better

Price

ASRock is cheaper by $8.50

Graphics Options

ASRock supports multiple graphics outputs

Power Design

ASRock has a stable 6-phase power design

Why MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support is better

Memory Capacity

MACHINIST supports up to 128 GB

Expansion Slots

MACHINIST has more PCIe slots

Cooling Features

MACHINIST includes a VRM cooling fan

Overall score

ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™
75
MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support
85

Specifications

SpecASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support
SocketAM4LGA 2011-V3
RAM Speed4733 MHzDDR4
PCIe Slots1 x16, 1 x11 x16, 2 x4
ChipsetNot specifiedIntel C612
NetworkNot specifiedGigabit LAN

Dimension comparison

ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™MACHINIST X99 LGA 2011-V3 Motherboard Support

Overview of the ASRock A520M-HDV and MACHINIST X99

The ASRock A520M-HDV is priced at $68.49, making it about 11% cheaper than the MACHINIST X99, which retails for $76.99. Both motherboards target different processor families, with the ASRock supporting AMD's Ryzen series while the MACHINIST caters to Intel's Xeon and Core i7 processors. This comparison will delve into their specifications, features, and overall suitability for different users.

Processor Compatibility

The ASRock A520M-HDV is designed for AMD's AM4 socket, supporting Ryzen processors from the 3000 to 5000 series, including future AMD Ryzen models. This compatibility provides flexibility for users looking to upgrade their systems. On the other hand, the MACHINIST X99 supports Intel's LGA 2011-V3 socket, accommodating Xeon E5 V3/V4 and Core i7 5th and 6th generation processors. This distinction is crucial for users who have a preference for either AMD or Intel platforms, as the choice of processor will significantly influence overall system performance and upgrade paths.

Memory Support

When it comes to memory, the ASRock A520M-HDV supports DDR4 RAM with speeds up to 4733 MHz (overclocked), allowing for a maximum memory capacity of 32 GB. This is ideal for users looking to build a system for gaming or heavy multitasking. Conversely, the MACHINIST X99 motherboard offers a 4-channel DDR4 memory configuration, also supporting up to 128 GB (4 x 32 GB), which is beneficial for memory-intensive applications, such as video editing or data analysis. The increased memory capacity of the MACHINIST makes it a better choice for professionals or power users.

Expansion Slots

The ASRock A520M-HDV features one PCIe 3.0 x16 slot and one PCIe 3.0 x1 slot, which may limit users who want to install multiple graphics cards or expansion cards. In contrast, the MACHINIST X99 provides a more generous offering, including one PCIe 3.0 x16 slot and two PCIe 3.0 x4 slots. This allows for greater flexibility in terms of adding graphics cards, NVMe drives, and other expansion options. For users focused on building a high-performance workstation, the MACHINIST offers a more robust expansion capability.

Graphics Output Options

The ASRock A520M-HDV provides multiple graphics output options, including D-Sub, DVI-D, and HDMI, with support for 4K resolution at 60Hz via the HDMI port. This versatility benefits users who may want to connect their systems to various display types. In contrast, the MACHINIST X99 does not specify graphics output options in the provided data, suggesting that users will need a dedicated graphics card for video output. This may be a consideration for those who prefer integrated graphics but want to use Intel processors with the MACHINIST motherboard.

Cooling and Power Design

The ASRock A520M-HDV features a 6-phase power design, which is beneficial for maintaining stable performance, especially when running high-performance processors. It also supports M.2 modules with data transfer speeds up to 32 Gb/s, enhancing system responsiveness. On the other hand, the MACHINIST X99 is equipped with a 6-phase power supply and includes a VRM cooling fan, ensuring effective heat dissipation during high-load scenarios. This focus on cooling is crucial for users who plan to overclock their CPUs or operate under heavy workloads, as it helps maintain system stability.

Connectivity Options

The ASRock A520M-HDV does not explicitly mention USB or network connectivity options, which may limit its appeal for users looking for advanced connectivity features. In contrast, the MACHINIST X99 includes a Gigabit LAN interface, SATA 6Gbps support, and USB 3.0 ports, ensuring ample connectivity for modern peripherals and network speeds. This variety in connectivity options makes the MACHINIST a more appealing choice for users who require extensive peripheral support.

Price Comparison

At $68.49, the ASRock A520M-HDV is about 11% less expensive than the MACHINIST X99, which is priced at $76.99. This price difference may influence budget-conscious users, particularly those who are building a system for general use or gaming. However, the MACHINIST may justify its higher price with superior memory support, additional expansion slots, and better cooling features, making it potentially more suitable for high-performance applications.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ASRock A520M-HDV and the MACHINIST X99 hinges on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that supports AMD's Ryzen processors for general use or gaming, the ASRock A520M-HDV is a solid choice. However, if you require higher memory capacity, better expansion options, and enhanced cooling for professional-grade applications, the MACHINIST X99 stands out despite its higher price. Your decision should align with your intended use case, processor preference, and desired system performance.