ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™ vs Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor
Updated August 2026 — Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor leads on features and cooling.
The Micro Center bundle offers superior performance and features compared to the ASRock motherboard, making it the better choice for demanding users.
Why ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™ is better
Price
ASRock is significantly cheaper at $68.49.
Basic Support
Supports AMD Ryzen processors for basic tasks.
Size
Compact form factor suitable for budget builds.
Why Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor is better
Performance
Micro Center offers a powerful Ryzen 5 5500 processor.
Memory Support
Supports up to 128 GB of DDR4 memory.
Cooling
Includes advanced cooling solutions for better thermal management.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock A520M-HDV Supports AMD AM4 Socket Ryzen™ | Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Supports Ryzen 3000/4000/5000 | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Cores/Threads | N/A | 6 Cores / 12 Threads |
| Max Boost | N/A | 4.2GHz |
| Memory Support | 32 GB DDR4 | 128 GB DDR4 |
| Cooling | Basic | Advanced with Fan Xpert 2+ |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When comparing the ASRock A520M-HDV and the Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor with ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS, it's important to note that these products cater to different segments of the market. The ASRock A520M-HDV is priced at $68.49, while the Micro Center bundle comes in at $219.99, making it about 222% more expensive. This significant price difference reflects the varying capabilities of each product, with the Micro Center offering more advanced features suitable for demanding gaming and multitasking scenarios.
Performance Capabilities
The ASRock A520M-HDV is designed to support AMD's Ryzen processors, including the 3rd, 4th, and 5th generation, although it does not support the Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 3 3200G. Its 6-phase power design enhances stability for overclocking. In contrast, the Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor boasts 6 cores and 12 threads, reaching a max boost clock of 4.2GHz. This processor is ideal for gaming, capable of delivering smooth 100+ FPS in popular titles, though it requires a discrete graphics card. Thus, the Micro Center product clearly outperforms the ASRock in terms of raw processing power.
Memory Support
Memory support is another distinguishing factor between the two products. The ASRock A520M-HDV supports DDR4 memory up to 4733 MHz (OC) with a maximum of 32 GB. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS motherboard included with the Micro Center bundle supports dual-channel DDR4 memory up to 128 GB. This means that for users who plan to run memory-intensive applications or multitask heavily, the Micro Center option provides a significant advantage, enabling much larger memory configurations.
Cooling Solutions
The cooling capabilities of these products differ markedly. The ASRock A520M-HDV does not specify advanced cooling features, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS includes a PCH heatsink and an enhanced Fan Xpert 2+ technology for better thermal management. Effective cooling is crucial in maintaining system performance, especially during intensive tasks such as gaming or video editing. The Micro Center solution is thus better suited for high-performance environments where heat management is a priority.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity is another area where the Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor shines. The ASRock A520M-HDV offers basic graphics output options including D-Sub, DVI-D, and HDMI, along with one PCIe 3.0 x16 and one x1 slot. Conversely, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS provides a more comprehensive set of connectivity options, including dual-channel USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, multiple SATA 6Gb/s ports, and M.2 support for faster data transfer rates. With 802.11ac Wi-Fi and various video output options, the Micro Center product caters to modern connectivity needs far better than the ASRock motherboard.
Aesthetic Appeal
The aesthetic design can also play a role in consumer choice. The ASRock A520M-HDV has a more utilitarian look, focusing solely on functionality. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS incorporates customizable RGB lighting, including headers for additional RGB components, which can enhance the overall look of a gaming rig. For users who prioritize aesthetics alongside performance, the Micro Center bundle is likely to be more appealing.
Pricing Structure
The ASRock A520M-HDV is priced at $68.49, which is an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers or those looking to build a basic system. On the other hand, the Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor and ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS combo is priced at $219.99. This higher price reflects the bundle's advanced features and higher performance capabilities. For users who require a robust setup for gaming or professional tasks, the investment in the Micro Center product may be justified, despite the almost threefold price increase.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASRock A520M-HDV and the Micro Center AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Desktop Processor with ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a budget-friendly motherboard that supports AMD Ryzen processors for basic tasks, the ASRock option at $68.49 is a solid choice. However, if you are a gamer or require a system capable of handling intensive applications, the Micro Center bundle, priced at $219.99, offers superior performance, greater memory capacity, and enhanced cooling solutions. Each product serves distinct purposes, making the choice contingent upon your performance requirements and budget considerations.

