vsversusfinder

ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATA vs ASUS TUF Gaming A520M

Updated July 2026 — ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATA wins on compatibility, ASUS TUF Gaming A520M wins on cooling and price.

The ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS offers superior gaming features and cooling solutions, making it the better choice for gamers. However, the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 is more budget-friendly.

Why ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATA is better

Price

ASRock is $20 cheaper.

Compatibility

Supports older Ryzen processors.

Basic Features

Sufficient for general use.

Why ASUS TUF Gaming A520M is better

Gaming Features

Includes advanced gaming connectivity options.

Cooling Solutions

Better cooling with VRM heatsink and Fan Xpert 2+.

Connectivity

More output options including DisplayPort.

Overall score

ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATA
75
ASUS TUF Gaming A520M
85

Specifications

SpecASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATAASUS TUF Gaming A520M
Processor SupportRyzen 2000/3000/4000/5000Ryzen 3000/4000/5000
Memory SpeedDDR4 3200DDR4 3200
PCIe Slots1x PCIe 3.0 x161x PCIe 3.0 x16 + more
Wi-FiNo802.11ac
RGB LightingNoAura Sync

Dimension comparison

ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 AM4 AMD Promontory B450 SATAASUS TUF Gaming A520M

Overview of the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 and ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS

When it comes to selecting the right motherboard for your build, the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS are two competitive options. The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 is priced at $79.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS, which retails for $99.99. Both motherboards are designed for AMD processors, but they cater to different needs and preferences.

Compatibility with Processors

The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 supports a wide range of AMD processors, including the Ryzen 2000, 3000, 4000 G-Series, 5000, and 5000 G-Series. This extensive compatibility makes it a versatile choice for users looking to upgrade or build a system with various AMD chips. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is tailored for the 3rd Gen Ryzen processors, supporting the Ryzen 5000 Series, 4000 G-Series, and 3000 Series. While both motherboards accommodate AMD's ecosystem, the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 offers broader compatibility for those who may want to utilize older Ryzen processors.

Memory Support

Memory support is crucial for performance, and both motherboards handle DDR4 memory. The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 supports DDR4 speeds of up to 3200 MHz, which is sufficient for most gaming and productivity tasks. On the other hand, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS also supports similar memory speeds but includes additional features like enhanced cooling solutions to maintain optimal performance during intense gaming sessions. This makes the ASUS board slightly more appealing for users who prioritize high-performance gaming.

Expansion Slots and Connectivity

In terms of expansion slots, the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 features one PCIe 3.0 x16 and one PCIe 2.0 x16 slot, allowing users to add additional graphics cards or other PCIe devices. The ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS, however, offers more robust options with a BIOS FlashBack button, USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, and a 32Gb/s M.2 onboard slot, which is particularly beneficial for users looking to improve data transfer speeds and overall system performance. The enhanced connectivity options of the ASUS board might be worth the extra cost for gamers and professionals alike.

Cooling Solutions

Cooling solutions are vital in maintaining system performance, especially under load. The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 offers basic cooling capabilities but lacks the comprehensive features of the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS. The ASUS motherboard is equipped with a large VRM heatsink, PCH heatsink, and Fan Xpert 2+ technology, which helps regulate system temperatures more effectively. This can be a significant advantage for gamers who push their systems to the limit, making the ASUS option a better choice for high-performance scenarios.

Gaming Features

For gamers, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is packed with features designed to enhance the gaming experience. It includes 802.11ac Wi-Fi, TUF LANGuard, and TurboLAN technology, which can improve online gaming performance. The motherboard also boasts ASUS-exclusive Aura Sync RGB lighting for customization, further appealing to gamers who value aesthetics. The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0, while a solid choice, does not offer the same level of gaming-focused features, making the ASUS a more compelling option for dedicated gamers.

Visual Outputs

Both motherboards provide various graphics output options, but they differ in capability. The ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 features HDMI output, which is suitable for most users. In comparison, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS offers a broader range of outputs, including DisplayPort, HDMI, and D-Sub, providing more flexibility in connecting to different monitors or setups. This versatility can be essential for users with multi-monitor configurations or specific display requirements.

Price and Value

With the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 priced at $79.00 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS at $99.99, the ASRock offers a more budget-friendly option. While the price difference is about $20, the ASUS board justifies its higher price with advanced features, better cooling solutions, and enhanced gaming capabilities. For users on a strict budget, the ASRock may be the better choice, but those willing to invest a bit more could benefit significantly from the features provided by the ASUS.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a budget-friendly motherboard that supports a wide range of AMD processors, the ASRock B450M/AC R2.0 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize gaming features, enhanced cooling, and better connectivity, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is worth the extra investment. Each motherboard has its strengths, and your decision should align with your gaming or computing priorities.