ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini vs GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO
Updated August 2026 — ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini leads on features and performance.
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 offers superior power delivery and memory speed, while the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO provides excellent value and connectivity options.
Why ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini is better
Power Delivery
ASRock has a 12+1+1+1+1 power phase design.
Memory Speed
Supports up to 9466 MHz DDR5.
Memory Capacity
Can accommodate up to 128 GB of RAM.
Why GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO is better
Price
GIGABYTE is $50 cheaper.
USB Ports
More USB connectivity options.
Thermal Management
Advanced thermal armor for better heat dissipation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini | GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Support | Intel Core Ultra | 14th/13th/12th Gen |
| Power Phase | 12+1+1+1+1 | 8+1+1 |
| Max RAM | 128 GB | Up to 64 GB |
| RAM Speed | 9466 MHz | Not specified |
| USB Type-C | 2 Thunderbolt 4 | 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 and GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is priced at $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO is approximately 17% cheaper at $199.99. Both products are Mini ITX motherboards that support next-generation Intel Core processors, but they cater to different user needs and preferences.
The ASRock motherboard supports Intel Core Ultra Processors (Series 2) with a robust 12+1+1+1+1 power phase, optimized for stability and performance. In contrast, the GIGABYTE model is designed to support 14th, 13th, and 12th Gen Intel Core Processors, featuring a digital VRM setup, which ensures steady power delivery. This difference in processor support may influence your decision based on your intended CPU choice.
Power Delivery and Performance
Power delivery is a critical factor in motherboard performance, and here, the ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 shines with its 12+1+1+1+1 power phase design, delivering up to 110A SPS for VCore. This high-quality power phase can help ensure stability during demanding tasks, such as gaming or high-performance computing.
On the other hand, the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO employs an enhanced power solution with a direct 8+1+1 digital VRM. This setup, coupled with a 10-layer PCB and premium chokes and capacitors, allows for a steady power supply but does differ from the ASRock's more robust power phase. Users seeking maximum overclocking potential may prefer the ASRock for its superior power delivery capabilities.
Memory Support and Expansion
When it comes to memory support, the ASRock motherboard can accommodate up to 128 GB of DDR5 RAM at speeds of 9466 MHz, demonstrating its capacity for high-performance applications. This makes it an excellent choice for users engaging in memory-intensive tasks or gaming.
Conversely, the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO supports DDR5 as well but allows for 4 DIMMs, giving it a different approach to memory expansion. While it does not specify a maximum speed as high as the ASRock, the flexibility of having four slots can be appealing for users looking for more modular memory upgrades down the line.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity plays a pivotal role in modern motherboards, and both models offer a range of ports, although they differ slightly in their configurations. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 features one HDMI and two Thunderbolt 4 Type-C ports, providing high-speed connectivity options ideal for various peripherals.
In comparison, the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO boasts a more extensive selection of USB ports, including one USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, one USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, and several USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports. This variety can facilitate easier connections for multiple devices, which may be a significant advantage for users with numerous peripherals.
Thermal Management
Thermal management is crucial for maintaining optimal performance during intensive tasks. The ASRock motherboard is designed for stability and efficiency, although specific thermal features are less emphasized within its description.
In contrast, the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO highlights its advanced thermal armor, which includes a heatsink for the VRM and multi-layered M.2 heatsinks. This feature is particularly advantageous for users who plan to push their systems to the limit through gaming or heavy workloads, as it helps prevent thermal throttling.
User-Friendly Features
Both motherboards integrate user-friendly features, but they cater to different preferences. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 includes BIOS Flashback and a Memory OC Shield, making it easier for users to manage system settings and memory overclocking.
The GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO excels with its integrated I/O shield, simplifying the assembly process for DIY builders. This thoughtful design aspect can save time and reduce frustration during setup, making it appealing to newer builders or those who frequently upgrade their systems.
Pricing Comparison
Price is a significant factor when choosing between two competing motherboards. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is available for $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO comes in at $199.99. This means that the GIGABYTE option is about $50 cheaper, providing a noteworthy price advantage without sacrificing essential features.
For budget-conscious consumers, the lower price point of the GIGABYTE motherboard may make it a more attractive option, especially for users who do not require the maximum power delivery or memory speeds offered by the ASRock model.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 and the GIGABYTE B760I AORUS PRO depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize maximum power delivery, higher memory speeds, and advanced features, the ASRock may be the better option, despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a more cost-effective solution with excellent connectivity and user-friendly features, the GIGABYTE motherboard stands out as a compelling choice.