ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini vs GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX DDR4 Intel LGA 1700 mATX
Updated August 2026 — ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini wins on memory and performance, GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX DDR4 Intel LGA 1700 mATX wins on price and thermals.
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 offers superior performance and features, while the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your performance needs and budget.
Why ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini is better
Memory Speed
Supports DDR5 up to 9466 MHz
Power Phase
More advanced 12+1+1+1+1 Power Phase
Design
Sleek and modern aesthetic
Why GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX DDR4 Intel LGA 1700 mATX is better
Price
Approximately 48% cheaper
Compatibility
Supports 14th, 13th, and 12th Gen Intel CPUs
Thermal Management
Advanced thermal armor with heatsinks
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini | GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX DDR4 Intel LGA 1700 mATX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Max Memory | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Power Phase | 12+1+1+1+1 | 6+2+1 |
| Graphics Outputs | 1 HDMI, 2 Thunderbolt 4 | 1 PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 vs GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is priced at $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX costs $129.99, making the GIGABYTE motherboard about 48% cheaper. Each motherboard caters to different user needs, from those seeking high-end features to budget-conscious gamers. In this comparison, we’ll delve into their specifications, performance, design, and connectivity options.
Performance Comparison
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is designed for Intel Core Ultra Processors (Series 2) and features a robust 12+1+1+1+1 Power Phase with 110A SPS for VCore. This configuration aims to deliver stable power for high-performance tasks. In contrast, the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX supports Intel Core 14th, 13th, and 12th Gen processors with a 6+2+1 Power Phase for steady power delivery. While both motherboards are capable, the ASRock offers a more advanced power solution, which may appeal to users demanding higher performance levels.
Memory Support
When it comes to memory support, the ASRock motherboard excels with its capability to handle dual-channel DDR5 memory up to 9466 MHz, accommodating up to 128 GB. This allows for high-speed data processing, which is ideal for gaming and content creation. On the other hand, the GIGABYTE B760M supports DDR4 memory, allowing for up to 4 DIMMs but lacks the same high-speed capability as the ASRock. Users looking to push their system to extreme performance levels may find the ASRock a better choice, while those satisfied with standard performance might lean towards the GIGABYTE.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity is a strong point for both motherboards. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 offers diverse graphics output options, including 1 HDMI and 2 Thunderbolt 4 Type-C ports, catering to users needing high-speed data transfer. In comparison, the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX provides comprehensive connectivity with 1 PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, 2 PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots, and a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C port. While both motherboards are well-equipped, the ASRock’s additional Thunderbolt ports may appeal to users who prioritize speed and versatility in their connections.
Thermal Management
Thermal management is crucial for maintaining performance, especially during intensive tasks. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 showcases features like BIOS Flashback and Memory OC Shield, which can help in stabilizing performance under load. The GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX, however, emphasizes its advanced thermal armor with chipset heatsinks for better heat dissipation. Both motherboards provide sufficient thermal management, but the focus on advanced thermal solutions in the GIGABYTE could be beneficial for gamers and heavy users who push their systems to the limit.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 sports a sleek and modern aesthetic, optimized for stability and durability, making it appealing for users who value aesthetics alongside performance. The GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX, being a mATX motherboard, is designed with a more traditional look but emphasizes a robust build quality, which is important for longevity. Users who prioritize visual appeal may prefer the ASRock, while those focused on durability might find the GIGABYTE more suitable for their needs.
Price and Value
The pricing of these motherboards highlights a significant difference in value. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is priced at $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX is available for $129.99. This makes the GIGABYTE approximately 48% cheaper, which may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. While the ASRock offers premium features aimed at high-performance users, the GIGABYTE provides solid performance at a more accessible price, making it attractive for mainstream users.
User Experience and Support
Both brands are known for their support and user-friendly features. The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 includes features like BIOS Flashback, which can simplify updates for users unfamiliar with the process. The GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX also offers Q-Flash Plus, allowing for effortless BIOS updates. Both motherboards cater to different levels of expertise, but the user-friendly features in both make them accessible for a wide range of users.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 and the GIGABYTE B760M DS3H AX boils down to your specific needs and budget. The ASRock is ideal for users seeking cutting-edge performance with its support for high-speed DDR5 memory and advanced power solutions. However, if you’re looking for a cost-effective option that still offers solid performance and connectivity, the GIGABYTE is a compelling choice at nearly half the price. Evaluate your requirements carefully to make the best decision for your build.