ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini vs GIGABYTE B760M Gaming Plus WiFi DDR4 LGA 1700
Updated August 2026 — ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini wins on performance and features, GIGABYTE B760M Gaming Plus WiFi DDR4 LGA 1700 wins on price and thermals.
The ASRock motherboard offers superior performance and advanced features, while the GIGABYTE provides excellent value for budget-conscious users.
Why ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini is better
Performance
Supports DDR5 and higher power phase design
Features
Includes Thunderbolt 4 connectivity
Future-proofing
Compatible with the latest Intel Core Ultra processors
Why GIGABYTE B760M Gaming Plus WiFi DDR4 LGA 1700 is better
Price
Costs $110 less than ASRock
Memory Support
Supports DDR4 with more DIMM slots
Thermal Management
Includes advanced thermal armor for better cooling
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 LGA1851 RL-ILM Mini | GIGABYTE B760M Gaming Plus WiFi DDR4 LGA 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Power Phases | 12+1+1+1+1 | 4+1+1 |
| M.2 Slots | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 3 | 4 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Motherboards
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 is priced at $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760M Gaming Plus is substantially cheaper at $139.99, making it about 44% less expensive. This price difference is significant for users on a budget or those looking to build a more cost-effective system. Each motherboard targets different user needs, with the ASRock board designed for high-performance tasks and the GIGABYTE board catering to gamers and general users.
Performance and Compatibility
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 supports Intel Core Ultra Processors (Series 2) with an LGA1851 socket, while the GIGABYTE B760M is compatible with Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th Generation Core processors using an LGA1700 socket. The ASRock boasts a robust 12+1+1+1+1 power phase design for VCore, ensuring stability during intense workloads. In contrast, the GIGABYTE features a hybrid digital 4+1+1 power phase system, providing solid performance suitable for gaming. The ASRock’s higher-end design may benefit enthusiasts and professionals, while the GIGABYTE is ideal for mainstream users.
Memory Support
In terms of memory capabilities, the ASRock motherboard supports DDR5 DIMMs, allowing dual-channel configurations of up to 9466+ MHz (overclocked), making it a powerhouse for memory-intensive applications. On the other hand, the GIGABYTE B760M supports DDR4 memory, accommodating four DIMMs and offering Intel XMP support for easy overclocking. This means that while the ASRock board is built for cutting-edge performance, the GIGABYTE is tailored for users prioritizing flexibility and compatibility with existing DDR4 components.
Connectivity Options
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 offers a range of connectivity options, including one HDMI and two Thunderbolt 4 Type-C ports. This provides high-speed data transfer and versatile connectivity options for modern peripherals. Conversely, the GIGABYTE B760M features one PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and two PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots, along with three USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports and one front USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C port. This breadth of connectivity on the GIGABYTE board is excellent for gamers who often require multiple connections for their devices, while the ASRock board is better suited for those needing high-speed connections for data-intensive tasks.
Thermal Management
Thermal management is crucial for maintaining system performance. The ASRock motherboard's design does not specifically highlight thermal features, but it is optimized for stability and efficiency. The GIGABYTE B760M, however, is equipped with advanced thermal armor, including enlarged MOSFET heatsinks for improved heat dissipation. This ensures that the GIGABYTE board remains cool under load, which is particularly beneficial for gamers and those who push their systems during intensive tasks.
Build Quality and Durability
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 motherboard is marketed for its stability, durability, and efficiency, making it an excellent choice for users looking for reliable performance over time. While specific durability features are not detailed, the overall design aims to offer a long-lasting solution. In contrast, the GIGABYTE B760M boasts premium chokes and capacitors in its power solution, which contribute to steady power delivery and enhance longevity. Both motherboards are built to last, but the GIGABYTE’s emphasis on power delivery components may provide an edge for performance-focused builds.
Price Comparison
The ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 retails for $249.99, while the GIGABYTE B760M is priced at $139.99. This price difference of about $110 makes the GIGABYTE board a more attractive option for budget-conscious builders. The value proposition of the GIGABYTE B760M is strong, especially when considering the performance it delivers at a lower price point. For users who may not need the high-end features of the ASRock board, the GIGABYTE offers a compelling alternative without sacrificing essential performance.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASRock Intel Core Ultra Z890 and the GIGABYTE B760M ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require cutting-edge performance with the latest technology and are willing to invest more, the ASRock motherboard is the way to go. However, if you're looking for a cost-effective solution that delivers excellent performance for gaming and general use, the GIGABYTE B760M is a solid choice at nearly 44% less in price. Consider your requirements and budget carefully to make the best decision for your build.