vsversusfinder

ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATX vs ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX

Updated August 2026 — ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATX wins on power and connectivity, ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX wins on price.

The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial excels in power delivery, connectivity, and cooling, making it ideal for enthusiasts, while the ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi offers solid performance at a budget-friendly price.

Why ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATX is better

Power Delivery

Crosshair has 24+2+2 stages vs Strix's 16+2+2

Connectivity

Crosshair features dual USB4 and dual 10G Ethernet

M.2 Slots

Crosshair offers seven M.2 slots compared to Strix's four

Why ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX is better

Price

Strix is $249.99, significantly cheaper than Crosshair

Design

Strix has a sleek white PCB for a modern look

Value

Strix provides solid performance for casual gamers

Overall score

ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATX
92
ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX
75

Specifications

SpecASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATXASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX
Power Stages24+2+216+2+2
USB PortsDual USB4Fewer USB ports
EthernetDual 10GSingle 1G
M.2 Slots74
AI FeaturesExtensiveBasic

Dimension comparison

ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial, AMD E-ATXASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi AMD AM5 X870 ATX

Design and Aesthetics

The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial is designed with a premium aesthetic, featuring a full-color 5" LCD for system monitoring, while the ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi presents a sleek white PCB that adds a clean, modern touch to any build. The Crosshair model emphasizes RGB lighting with multiple customizable headers, appealing to gamers who prioritize visual flair. In contrast, the Strix focuses on a minimalist design while still offering essential RGB lighting capabilities. Both motherboards reflect ASUS's commitment to creating visually stunning products, but the Crosshair stands out with its advanced display and more extensive RGB options.

Power and Performance

The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial boasts a robust power solution with 24+2+2 power stages, providing superior power delivery for high-performance CPUs. This is significantly more than the Strix's 16+2+2 power stages, which, while still solid, supports lower power ratings of up to 90A per stage. The Crosshair is designed for extreme overclocking and demanding applications, making it ideal for enthusiasts and professionals. Meanwhile, the Strix model balances performance and cost, offering a capable solution for gaming and general use without the same level of power delivery.

Connectivity Options

When it comes to connectivity, the ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial outshines the Strix with a plethora of options. The Crosshair features dual USB4 Type-C ports, multiple USB 10Gbps ports, and dual Realtek 10G Ethernet, making it exceptionally well-equipped for high-speed data transfer and networking. The Strix, while still capable, offers fewer USB ports and lacks the dual 10G Ethernet, which may limit high-bandwidth applications. If connectivity is a priority, the Crosshair’s extensive options cater to power users who require robust networking capabilities.

M.2 Slot Availability

The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial provides extensive M.2 support with seven slots, including two PCIe 5.0 slots and additional slots via expansion cards. This makes it an excellent choice for users needing multiple high-speed storage options. In comparison, the Strix offers four M.2 slots, which, while sufficient for most gaming setups, may not satisfy those looking to maximize storage performance. The substantial difference in M.2 availability makes the Crosshair a more future-proof option for storage-intensive tasks.

Cooling Solutions

The cooling capabilities of the ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial are enhanced by its optimized thermal design, featuring a 3D VC M.2 heatsink and massive heatsinks integrated with the I/O cover. This design effectively dissipates heat, ensuring stable performance during intense workloads. The Strix also includes quality cooling solutions but does not match the comprehensive thermal management of the Crosshair. For users who push their systems hard, the superior cooling of the Crosshair can lead to better thermal performance and longevity of components.

AI Features

Both motherboards come equipped with advanced AI features that enhance performance and user experience. The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial includes AI Cache Boost and AI Advisor, which optimize system performance based on workload demands. Similarly, the Strix incorporates AI Overclocking and AI Cooling II, making it easier to achieve optimal performance without manual tweaking. However, the Crosshair’s more extensive AI capabilities provide a higher level of automation and efficiency, potentially making it more appealing for users who value seamless performance enhancements.

Pricing and Value

The ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial is priced at $1,199.99, while the ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi comes in significantly cheaper at $249.99, making it about 79% less expensive. This substantial price difference reflects the premium features and advanced technology of the Crosshair, making it a worthwhile investment for serious gamers and content creators. Conversely, the Strix offers excellent value for casual gamers or those on a budget, delivering solid performance without the high-end features of the Crosshair.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASUS ROG Crosshair X870E Glacial and the ASUS ROG Strix X870-A Gaming WiFi ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize high-end features, extensive connectivity, and superior power delivery, the Crosshair is the clear winner, albeit at a higher price point. However, if you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers solid performance for gaming and everyday tasks, the Strix is an excellent choice. In summary, your decision should weigh the importance of premium features against the value of more accessible pricing.