ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 WiFi 6 Extendable Gaming vs TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 WiFi 7 Router Archer BE550
Updated July 2026 — ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 WiFi 6 Extendable Gaming wins on price and gaming, TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 WiFi 7 Router Archer BE550 wins on connectivity and speed.
The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 is a great choice for gamers seeking optimized features at a lower price, while the TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 offers superior speed and connectivity options for heavy users.
Why ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 WiFi 6 Extendable Gaming is better
Price
ASUS is $50 cheaper
Gaming Features
Dedicated Gaming Port and Mobile Game Mode
Ease of Setup
Straightforward installation process
Why TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 WiFi 7 Router Archer BE550 is better
Speed
TP-Link offers up to 9.7 Gbps
Connectivity
Includes 10 Gbps WAN and 2.5 Gbps LAN ports
Coverage
Better coverage with six antennas and Beamforming technology
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 WiFi 6 Extendable Gaming | TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 WiFi 7 Router Archer BE550 |
|---|---|---|
| WiFi Standard | WiFi 6 | WiFi 7 |
| Max Speed | 5400 Mbps | 9.7 Gbps |
| Ports | 1 x 1G | 1 x 10G + 4 x 2.5G |
| Antennas | 4 | 6 |
| VPN Support | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 and TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700
The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 and TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 are both high-performance routers catering to gamers and heavy internet users. The ASUS router is priced at $249.99, while the TP-Link model costs $299.99, making the ASUS about 17% cheaper. Both routers are designed to provide superior connectivity and robust features, but they target slightly different user needs, particularly with respect to gaming and streaming capabilities.
Speed and Performance
When it comes to speed, the ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 boasts WiFi 6 technology, offering speeds up to 5400 Mbps. In contrast, the TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 uses the newer WiFi 7 standard, featuring speeds up to 9.7 Gbps. This significant increase in potential speed makes the TP-Link a better option for users with high bandwidth demands, such as those engaging in 8K streaming or online gaming. The ASUS router may still excel in gaming with its dedicated gaming port and Mobile Game Mode, but the sheer speed of the TP-Link is hard to overlook.
Features for Gamers
The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 is tailored for gamers, featuring a dedicated Gaming Port, Mobile Game Mode, and Gear Accelerator, which optimize gaming performance across devices. It also supports VPN Fusion, allowing simultaneous VPN and regular internet connections. While the TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 does support gaming through its high-speed connectivity and low latency, it lacks specific gaming optimizations. Therefore, for dedicated gamers, the ASUS router provides more focused features to enhance the gaming experience.
Connectivity Options
The TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 excels in connectivity options, featuring one 10 Gbps WAN port and four 2.5 Gbps LAN ports, which allow for multi-gigabit connectivity. This enables users to maximize their internet speeds, especially when integrating with multi-gigabit modems. The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400, while robust with its various ports, does not match the sheer number and speed of the TP-Link's ports. For users requiring multiple high-speed connections, the TP-Link offers a clear advantage.
Coverage and Range
Coverage is another important factor where TP-Link's design shines. With six internal antennas and Beamforming technology, the BE9700 is engineered to deliver extensive WiFi coverage, reaching every corner of a home, including hard-to-reach areas. The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 is compatible with AiMesh for extending coverage, but the built-in capabilities of the TP-Link give it an edge in terms of immediate coverage. For larger homes or spaces with multiple devices, the TP-Link is likely to provide a more stable connection.
Security Features
Both routers offer robust security features, but their approaches differ. The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 includes AiProtection Pro, ensuring commercial-grade security powered by Trend Micro, along with Instant Guard for secure public WiFi connections. On the other hand, the TP-Link BE9700 offers TP-Link HomeShield, which provides comprehensive network protection and parental controls. While both routers prioritize security, ASUS's focus on commercial-grade protection makes it a strong contender for users prioritizing privacy and security.
User Experience and Setup
User experience is a critical factor in router performance, and both models provide different setups. The ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 is noted for its straightforward installation process, appealing to gamers who might want to get their network up and running quickly. The TP-Link BE9700 features the Tether app for easy management and setup, allowing users to control their network from any mobile device. This convenience can be particularly appealing for families or users with multiple devices requiring constant management.
Price Comparison
At $249.99, the ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 is positioned as a more budget-friendly option compared to the TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700, which retails at $299.99. This price difference of $50 makes the ASUS router attractive for users who want high performance without breaking the bank. However, the advanced features and potentially higher speeds of the TP-Link may justify its cost for users who can leverage those capabilities. Thus, the choice may ultimately hinge on individual user needs and budget considerations.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASUS ROG Strix GS-AX5400 and the TP-Link Tri-Band BE9700 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you are a dedicated gamer looking for optimized gaming features and a lower price point, the ASUS router is an excellent choice. However, if you require the latest WiFi technology, exceptional speed, and robust connectivity options for numerous devices, the TP-Link model is worth the investment. Each router has its strengths, making the decision a matter of what aspects are most important to you in a home network.

