Audient EVO 4 USB Audio Interface vs Behringer UMC204HD Audiophile 2x4, 24-Bit/192 kHz
Updated August 2026 — Audient EVO 4 USB Audio Interface leads on brand reputation and audio quality.
The Audient EVO 4 offers superior sound quality and features, while the Behringer UMC204HD provides excellent value and MIDI functionality.
Why Audient EVO 4 USB Audio Interface is better
Sound Quality
Audient features class-leading AKM converters.
Ease of Use
Smart gain dial simplifies level adjustments.
Build Quality
Sleek modern design enhances user interaction.
Why Behringer UMC204HD Audiophile 2x4, 24-Bit/192 kHz is better
Price
Behringer is significantly cheaper.
MIDI Functionality
Includes built-in MIDI I/O.
Input Options
Offers two combination XLR/TRS inputs.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Audient EVO 4 USB Audio Interface | Behringer UMC204HD Audiophile 2x4, 24-Bit/192 kHz |
|---|---|---|
| Sample Rate | 24-Bit/96 kHz | 24-Bit/192 kHz |
| Inputs | 1 JFET | 2 XLR/TRS |
| Outputs | 2 | 4 |
| Phantom Power | Yes | Yes |
| Software Mixer | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Audient EVO 4 USB Audio Interface costs $161.40, while the Behringer UMC204HD Audiophile 2x4 is priced at $109.00. This makes the Behringer about 17% cheaper than the Audient. For budget-conscious users, the significant price difference might make the Behringer a more attractive option, especially for those just starting with audio recording. However, if you're willing to invest a bit more, the Audient offers features that could justify its higher price.
Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, both interfaces offer impressive specifications. The Audient EVO 4 features class-leading AKM converters, ensuring high-quality audio conversion. On the other hand, the Behringer UMC204HD boasts world-class Midas-designed mic preamps, known for their exceptional sound reproduction. Both interfaces support high-resolution audio, with the Behringer reaching up to 192 kHz, which is particularly beneficial for demanding applications in music and video production. Therefore, while both products promise high-quality sound, the choice may come down to personal preference regarding the brand's audio fidelity reputation.
Input and Output Capabilities
The Audient EVO 4 provides a discrete JFET instrument input and a multifunctional rotary control with an LED ring, which adds flexibility to your recording setup. In contrast, the Behringer UMC204HD offers two combination XLR/TRS inputs, allowing for a broad range of connectivity options. It also features MIDI I/O, enabling connection with external MIDI devices—something the Audient lacks. Thus, if you require extensive connectivity, the Behringer may offer a more versatile solution.
Ease of Use
Ease of use is another important factor to consider. The Audient EVO 4 is designed with a smart gain dial that automatically adjusts levels for you, which can significantly streamline the recording process. Additionally, its DSP-based low-latency software mixer allows for flexible routing, making it user-friendly for both beginners and experienced users alike. Conversely, the Behringer UMC204HD is marketed as a "studio in a black box," emphasizing its straightforward setup for plugging in microphones and instruments. While both interfaces are user-friendly, the automatic features of the Audient could provide a more seamless experience for those who prefer minimal manual adjustments.
Build Quality and Design
Both interfaces are built with durability in mind, but they present different aesthetics. The Audient EVO 4 has a sleek, modern design that appeals to contemporary users, while the Behringer UMC204HD features a more classic look. The Audient’s intuitive layout and smart touchpoints enhance user interaction, making it visually appealing and practical. The Behringer, with its robust build, is designed for users who might prioritize a rugged interface for travel and live performances. Ultimately, the choice of design should reflect personal taste and intended use.
MIDI Functionality
MIDI functionality is a notable distinction between the two products. The Behringer UMC204HD includes built-in MIDI I/O, allowing users to connect keyboards and other MIDI hardware seamlessly. This feature adds a layer of flexibility for musicians who incorporate MIDI into their workflow. In contrast, the Audient EVO 4 does not include MIDI capabilities, which may be a limiting factor for those looking to integrate MIDI devices into their setup. Musicians heavily reliant on MIDI would find the Behringer a more comprehensive choice.
Brand Reputation
Brand reputation plays a role in purchasing decisions for many consumers. Audient is known for its high-quality audio equipment and has garnered a strong following among professionals who prioritize audio fidelity. The Audient EVO 4 holds a sales rank of 7021, indicating a solid market presence. Behringer, while often seen as a more budget-friendly option, is recognized for its commitment to providing accessible audio solutions, which has earned it a loyal customer base. The Behringer UMC204HD has a slightly lower sales rank of 9918, but its value proposition continues to appeal to many users.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Audient EVO 4 and the Behringer UMC204HD ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're seeking high-quality audio with intelligent features and are willing to invest a bit more, the Audient EVO 4 could be the better choice. However, if you're looking for a cost-effective solution that offers excellent functionality, especially with MIDI support, the Behringer UMC204HD stands out as a strong contender. Consider your recording aspirations and preferences to make the best decision for your audio interface needs.

