Audient iD24 USB-C Audio Interface vs MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface
Updated August 2026 — Audient iD24 USB-C Audio Interface wins on expandability and connectivity, MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface wins on price and user experience.
The Audient iD24 offers superior audio quality and expandability, while the MOTU M2 is a budget-friendly option with solid performance.
Why Audient iD24 USB-C Audio Interface is better
Audio Quality
iD24 features class-leading AD/DA converters with 126dB dynamic range.
Expandability
iD24 includes ADAT input/output for adding more channels.
Build Quality
iD24 is designed for professional use with robust construction.
Why MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface is better
Price
M2 is significantly cheaper at $199.95.
User Experience
M2 offers a straightforward interface for beginners.
Sales Rank
M2 has a higher sales rank indicating popularity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Audient iD24 USB-C Audio Interface | MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Preamps | 2 Class-A | 2 Preamps |
| Dynamic Range | 126dB | Not specified |
| Sample Rate | 32-bit | 24-bit/192kHz |
| ADAT Support | Yes | No |
| Hardware Monitoring | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the MOTU M2 is significantly more affordable than the Audient iD24. The iD24 is priced at $475.63, while the M2 costs only $199.95. This makes the M2 approximately 58% cheaper than the iD24, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious consumers or those new to audio interfaces. The price difference could allow users to allocate their budget for additional gear, such as microphones or cables, which is particularly appealing for emerging artists and producers.
Audio Quality
Audio quality is a critical factor for any audio interface, and both the Audient iD24 and the MOTU M2 deliver impressive performance. The iD24 features class-leading AD/DA converters with 32-bit DAC converter technology and a dynamic range of 126dB, ensuring exceptional clarity and detail in audio playback. On the other hand, the M2 offers 24-bit/192kHz audio quality, which is still excellent but does not quite reach the same level of dynamic range as the iD24. For audiophiles and professional users seeking the utmost in sound reproduction, the iD24 might be the preferred choice.
Features and Expandability
The Audient iD24 offers a wider array of features compared to the MOTU M2, particularly in terms of expandability. The iD24 includes two Class-A Audient Console mic preamps and an ADAT input and output, allowing users to expand their setup by adding up to 8 additional channels if needed. This is particularly beneficial for larger recording sessions, such as tracking a full band. The MOTU M2, while equipped with two preamps, does not offer the same level of expandability. It is designed for simpler setups but still includes hardware monitoring, which is a useful feature for real-time audio processing.
User Experience
In terms of user experience, both audio interfaces are designed for ease of use, but they cater to slightly different audiences. The iD24 includes assignable monitor controls with three programmable function buttons, allowing users to customize their workflow and access features like Speaker Select and Talkback quickly. This added level of control can enhance productivity during recording sessions. The MOTU M2, while simpler, provides a straightforward interface that is easy to navigate, making it an excellent option for beginners or those who prefer a more streamlined experience.
Build Quality and Design
Build quality is another essential factor to consider. The Audient iD24 is designed with a robust construction that reflects its professional-grade status. The iD24's design includes high-quality components that contribute to its durability, making it suitable for both studio and on-the-road use. Conversely, the MOTU M2, while still solidly built, is tailored more towards home studio use. Its design is functional, but it may not withstand the rigors of frequent transport as well as the iD24.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
When considering brand reputation, both Audient and MOTU have established themselves as reliable names in the audio industry. The iD24 currently holds a sales rank of 11,340, while the M2 is significantly higher at 1,326, indicating its popularity among consumers. This higher bestseller rank for the M2 could be attributed to its lower price point and ease of use, making it a favored choice for many individuals looking for quality without breaking the bank.
Connectivity Options
Connectivity is crucial for versatility in an audio interface. The Audient iD24 shines with its extensive connectivity options, including ADAT and SPDIF inputs and outputs, allowing for greater expandability. It also features two balanced inserts for integrating outboard effects. The MOTU M2, while offering USB-C connectivity with two preamps, is more limited in this area. It’s designed for straightforward use, which might be sufficient for many users but lacks the advanced connectivity that professional setups may require.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Audient iD24 and the MOTU M2 depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a high-quality audio interface that offers extensive features, superior audio quality, and expandability, the Audient iD24 is the better choice, despite its higher price of $475.63. However, if you're on a budget and prefer a user-friendly interface that still delivers great audio performance, the MOTU M2 at $199.95 is an excellent option. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your individual requirements, whether that’s advanced features and audio fidelity or simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

