Audiosavings Bundle: AKG D112 MKII Professional vs Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Audiosavings Bundle: AKG D112 MKII Professional wins on price and versatility, Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone wins on sales rank.
The Audiosavings Bundle offers a comprehensive solution with a mixer and microphone, while the Shure PGA57 is a cost-effective standalone microphone. For those needing versatility, the Audiosavings Bundle is the better choice.
Why Audiosavings Bundle: AKG D112 MKII Professional is better
Versatility
Includes a mixer for multiple inputs
Features
Integrated USB recording interface
Microphone Quality
Industry-standard for bass drum microphones
Why Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone is better
Price
Significantly lower cost
Simplicity
Ideal for single instrument recording
Sales Rank
Higher popularity in the market
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Audiosavings Bundle: AKG D112 MKII Professional | Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Polar Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency Response | 20-17000 Hz | Not specified |
| Connector Type | XLR | XLR |
| Phantom Power | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Audiosavings Bundle offers a comprehensive solution for musicians with its microphone and mixer combination, while the Shure PGA57 is a standalone professional quality instrument microphone. The Audiosavings Bundle is priced at $264.18, making it significantly more expensive than the Shure PGA57, which retails for $71.00. This pricing difference of about 273% reflects the additional features and components included in the Audiosavings Bundle.
Microphone Quality
The Audiosavings Bundle includes the AKG D112 MKII, known for its dynamic performance, particularly suited for kick drums and bass guitars. It features a cardioid polar pattern which effectively captures low frequencies while minimizing background noise. Conversely, the Shure PGA57 also employs a cardioid pattern, focusing on clear sound reproduction for various instruments. Both microphones are designed for professional use, but the AKG D112 MKII is often regarded as a benchmark for bass drum microphones, having been a favorite on stages for over 30 years.
Versatility and Applications
When it comes to versatility, the Audiosavings Bundle excels due to its inclusion of the Rockville RockMix 4 Channel Mic/Instrument Pro Recording Mixer. This mixer allows users to connect multiple instruments and microphones, making it ideal for both studio recordings and live performances. In contrast, the Shure PGA57 is designed primarily for capturing sound from a single instrument, making it less versatile for complex setups. The ability to connect various audio devices through the Audiosavings Bundle enhances its appeal for musicians looking for comprehensive recording solutions.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of both microphones is commendable, but they cater to different preferences. The AKG D112 MKII features a robust design with a flexible mount, making it easy to position for optimal sound capture. The Shure PGA57, on the other hand, boasts a sleek industrial design with a black metallic finish, providing an unobtrusive visual presence on stage. While both products are constructed for durability, the Audiosavings Bundle’s microphone is specifically tailored to handle high sound pressure levels, which is essential for live performances involving loud instruments.
Additional Features
The Audiosavings Bundle stands out with its additional features, such as the integrated USB recording interface in the Rockville mixer. This feature allows for easy connection to computers for recording, making it a great choice for home studios. Additionally, the mixer includes phantom power for condenser microphones, enhancing its usability. The Shure PGA57, while featuring a tailored microphone cartridge design for clear sound reproduction, lacks these advanced functionalities, which may limit its usability in certain recording contexts.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two products is significant, with the Audiosavings Bundle costing $264.18 compared to the Shure PGA57’s price of $71.00. This represents a difference of about $193.18, which means that the Audiosavings Bundle is approximately 273% more expensive. While the higher price of the Audiosavings Bundle may be justified by its additional components and features, budget-conscious consumers may find the Shure PGA57 to be a more practical choice, especially for those who require a straightforward microphone for specific instruments.
Sales Ranking
In terms of popularity, the Shure PGA57 has a sales rank of 20,657, indicating a solid presence in the market. Meanwhile, the Audiosavings Bundle ranks at 52,915, suggesting it may not be as widely purchased. This difference in sales rank may reflect the Shure PGA57’s appeal as a versatile, cost-effective microphone for musicians and sound engineers looking for reliability without breaking the bank.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Audiosavings Bundle and the Shure PGA57 hinges on your specific needs as a musician or recording artist. If you require a comprehensive setup for recording multiple instruments and appreciate the advanced features of a mixer, the Audiosavings Bundle could be a worthy investment despite its higher price. However, if you’re looking for a reliable, high-quality microphone for individual instrument recording at a significantly lower cost, the Shure PGA57 presents a compelling option. Ultimately, both products serve their respective functions well, but your choice should align with your intended use, budget, and desired features.

