AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package for Live Sound or in the Studio vs Shure Beta 91A Kick Drum Microphone
Updated August 2026 — AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package for Live Sound or in the Studio leads on versatility and sound quality.
The AUDIX DP7 offers a comprehensive solution for drummers, while the Shure Beta 91A is a budget-friendly option focused on kick drums.
Why AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package for Live Sound or in the Studio is better
Versatility
Includes multiple microphones for different drum components.
Sound Quality
Excels in capturing diverse drum sounds.
Application
Suitable for both studio and live performances.
Why Shure Beta 91A Kick Drum Microphone is better
Price
More affordable option for kick drum performance.
Setup
Simpler setup with low-profile design.
Brand Reputation
Renowned for quality and reliability in live settings.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package for Live Sound or in the Studio | Shure Beta 91A Kick Drum Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Microphones | 5 | 1 |
| Frequency Response | 30Hz-15kHz | 20Hz-20kHz |
| Dynamic Range | High | Wide |
| Design | Multi-mic | Low-profile |
| Application | Studio & Live | Kick Drum |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package and Shure Beta 91A
The AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package offers a comprehensive solution for drummers, while the Shure Beta 91A is specifically designed for kick drum applications. Priced at $1,129.00, the AUDIX package includes multiple microphones tailored for different drum components, making it ideal for both live sound and studio use. In contrast, the Shure Beta 91A is more affordable at $242.00, focusing solely on delivering high-quality sound for kick drums. With a bestseller rank of 78,172 for the AUDIX and 57,178 for the Shure, both products have established their places in the market.
Microphone Design and Features
The AUDIX DP7 includes five different microphones, providing a versatile solution for drummers. Each microphone is designed for a specific purpose: the D6 for kick drums, the i5 for snares, the D2 for toms, the D4 for floor toms, and the ADX51 for overhead applications. This variety allows musicians to capture the unique tonal qualities of each drum. Meanwhile, the Shure Beta 91A features a low-profile design intended for easy placement within a kick drum. It utilizes a cardioid pattern to minimize feedback, making it particularly suitable for live performances.
Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, the AUDIX DP7 excels due to its diverse set of microphones, each tailored to reproduce specific frequencies effectively. The D6, for instance, covers a frequency response of 30Hz-15kHz, making it excellent for kick drums. The Shure Beta 91A, on the other hand, delivers studio-quality sound even at high sound pressure levels, which is essential for kick drums. Its boundary effect design enhances low-end response, making it a strong contender for bass applications. While both microphones promise great sound, the AUDIX package provides a broader range of options for capturing different drum sounds.
Usability and Setup
Setting up the AUDIX DP7 might be more complex due to the multiple microphones included, but it offers flexibility in how each mic can be positioned and utilized. The Shure Beta 91A simplifies this process with its low-profile design that requires no external mounting hardware, allowing for quick and easy setup directly inside the kick drum. For musicians looking for straightforward usability, the Shure may be more appealing. However, those who want a comprehensive setup for an entire drum kit will find the AUDIX package to be more beneficial.
Price Comparison
The AUDIX DP7 is significantly more expensive at $1,129.00 compared to the Shure Beta 91A's price of $242.00. This price difference of approximately 367% reflects the additional microphones and versatility offered by the AUDIX package. However, for drummers primarily focused on kick drum performance, the Shure Beta 91A presents a budget-friendly option without sacrificing sound quality. This stark contrast in pricing might influence buyers based on their specific needs and budget constraints.
Brand Reputation and Reliability
Both AUDIX and Shure are renowned brands in the audio equipment industry, boasting a reputation for quality and reliability. The Shure Beta 91A, with its legendary quality and ruggedness, has become a standard in many live performance settings. The AUDIX DP7, while also respected, is specifically tailored for those wanting a multi-microphone setup. The choice between the two brands may come down to personal preference, but it's clear both have established a loyal following among musicians.
Application Versatility
The AUDIX DP7 is designed for versatility, suitable for both studio and live sound applications. Each microphone in the package caters to different aspects of a drum kit, making it ideal for comprehensive recordings or live performances. Conversely, the Shure Beta 91A is specifically tailored for kick drums, excelling in that specific application but lacking the versatility of the AUDIX package. For musicians who need a variety of mics for different drum sounds, the AUDIX offers a more complete solution.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the AUDIX DP7 Drum Mic Package and the Shure Beta 91A ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a complete set of microphones for a full drum kit and are willing to invest $1,129.00, the AUDIX DP7 is an excellent choice. However, if your primary focus is on achieving high-quality sound for kick drums without breaking the bank, the Shure Beta 91A at $242.00 stands out as a smart option. Each product has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of musicians and scenarios.

